I know a couple others have already alluded to this, but can anyone give me any kind of a logical reason why this Pitt line is so low? I thought that it was a steal at -4, but now that I've seen that it's been bet down to -2 I can't help but get suspicious. I was one among the many that got burned on the Memphis-UAB game a few weeks back where that line seemed too good to be true. Seton Hall is mediocre in every way, playing only slightly above .500 at home (at 8-7) and they've lost 4 in a row.
I know that Pitt only won by 5 at home against Hall three weeks ago, but that was a game where Pitt controlled the game by double digits throughout and a late miracle surge by the Pirates kept it close. I also realize that it's senior night for SH.
Just compare this game to another on the boards tonight, Marquette vs. E. Carolina. Both have top 10 teams playing sub-.500 clubs (though Seton Hall played a tougher schedule, EC is much better at home at 11-5), both on senior night. Yet the line for the Marquette game is 11, and the Pitt one is at 2. Something seems very out of whack. If someone can convince me that this line is not suspicious, this has big-time written all over it. I'd hate to pass on this because of paranoia only to see Pitt roll . . .
I know that Pitt only won by 5 at home against Hall three weeks ago, but that was a game where Pitt controlled the game by double digits throughout and a late miracle surge by the Pirates kept it close. I also realize that it's senior night for SH.
Just compare this game to another on the boards tonight, Marquette vs. E. Carolina. Both have top 10 teams playing sub-.500 clubs (though Seton Hall played a tougher schedule, EC is much better at home at 11-5), both on senior night. Yet the line for the Marquette game is 11, and the Pitt one is at 2. Something seems very out of whack. If someone can convince me that this line is not suspicious, this has big-time written all over it. I'd hate to pass on this because of paranoia only to see Pitt roll . . .

