Pitt-WVU

jr11

08-18-05
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
5,830
29
0
114
HELL
still freezing my balls off as i was at the game. one can't predict four turnover's (one on downs) for Pitt within the opposing teams 30. wrong side again for me. vegas must love wvu or something, i believe that puts them at 9-2 ats this year. wvu is a very well coached team...no to's, i think one penalty, and did not have it's kicker kick the ball out of bounds twice on kickoffs. we are going to run the ball, stop it if you can.

jr11
 

TLove

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 11, 2002
940
0
0
I also had Pitt for a good amount of Money.

You can't turn the ball over an expect to win. I still believe Pitt was the right side.

I'm cursed this week
 

ImpetuousMM

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 23, 2002
5
0
0
45
East Coast
had pitt to, being a WVU student i did'nt think WVU had a shot, Pitt shoulda won by 3 td's if it iwerent for TO's.

MIKe:thefinger :moon:
 

c20916

Slacker
Forum Member
Aug 19, 2000
3,677
6
0
50
St. Charles, IL
I had them too, I couldnt' believe it, it seems I never benefit from the to's, it's the team I bet on that seems to lose the to battle.
 

jr11

08-18-05
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
5,830
29
0
114
HELL
c20916

i hear you loud and clear. it is funny, but when you get to watch the actual game it always seems like the side your on loses the TOver battle and penalties. wvu played a great game. no huddle offense confused pitt--i witnessed firsthand. it was like we are going to run the ball to the right so stop it if you can. i used to do that to my degenerate brother when i was playing college basketball. well coached team as i had mentioned before. plus, they probably had just as many fans there. really no home field advantage from that standpoint.

jr11
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top