Predicted Scores vs. Vegas Lines - Oct. 24-26

djchad

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
233
0
0
Melbourne, FL
Here they are, with an average std dev of 4.82:

<pre>
Favors Line Avg Pred Diff Std Dev Play
Air Force -17.50 -25.95 8.45 6.15 **
Alabama 2.00 -2.88 4.88 5.39 *
Arizona St -3.50 -8.35 4.85 4.60 *
Baylor 30.50 27.67 2.83 11.11 -
BG -21.00 -23.96 2.96 5.18 -
Buffalo 6.50 2.95 3.55 3.65 *
Cal 5.50 0.09 5.41 5.48 *
Cent Mich 20.50 15.33 5.17 4.95 *
Colo St -12.00 -17.53 5.53 4.71 *
Idaho 4.00 1.16 2.84 5.10 -
Indiana 9.00 1.95 7.05 4.51 ***
Iowa St 13.00 7.39 5.61 5.46 *
LSU -3.50 -12.51 9.01 5.41 **
NC State -1.00 -3.74 2.74 3.56 -
Nevada 4.50 -2.81 7.31 5.00 **
New Mexico 6.00 1.06 4.94 4.96 *
Notre Dame 10.00 1.36 8.64 6.85 **
Ohio St -4.50 -10.54 6.04 5.51 **
Rutgers 15.50 12.44 3.06 6.99 *
SJ State 16.00 12.88 3.12 6.03 *
Texas Tech 6.00 3.29 2.71 2.32 -
UAB -8.00 -13.88 5.88 14.78 *
UConn 8.00 2.37 5.63 4.24 *
UTEP 2.50 -1.31 3.81 7.58 *
Va Tech -28.50 -33.28 4.78 7.14 *
Virginia 5.50 -1.65 7.15 5.36 **
Wash St -11.00 -16.31 5.31 5.35 *
Wisconsin -2.50 -5.45 2.95 3.10 -
</pre>

3 star play = The predicted score is at least 6.00 above the
posted line AND the std. deviation of the predicted scores is less
than the avg std dev.

2 star play = The predicted score is at least 6.00 above the posted line AND the std. deviation of the predicted scores is greater than the avg std dev.

1 star play = The predicted score is at least 3.00 above the posted line but less than 6.00 above the posted line.


A few "wrong team is favored" picks this week:
Alabama, Nevada, UTEP, and Virginia

And even though the Texas Tech pick does not merit a star rating, it should be given a look, especially with a std dev so low.
 
Last edited:

Joe De

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 10, 2002
1,440
1
0
thx djchad..as usual the stats do not show my dog of the week..no problem...it does have one which is Indiana
As i understand ...the lower the Std deviation and the higher difference ....makes a play ..example you said tex tech with a 2.32 std. deviation with a difference2.71 is not a play because it did not hit above 6.0,,,is that correct?
 

moeclarrett

Bus Driver
Forum Member
Aug 28, 2002
102
0
0
43
out of curiosity, I was wondering if it is coinsidence or a trend that most of the two and three stars plays (6 out of 7) are the visiting team. Anyone else notice that and has anyone taken note if this is a regularity or not.

Also, gotta respect the Bucks qualifying for 2 stars. It definitly was a no play for me before, as I would never bet against my team, and rarely do I even bet for them - especially with the entire world calling for Penn St. to not only cover, but to win outright. But the way this system has been working thus far, I may throw a little money on them.

dj, that USC game was a great payoff - thanks much :)

Go Bucks
 

djchad

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
233
0
0
Melbourne, FL
Yes, a low standard deviation and a high point difference makes a play. But 1-star plays hit because the diff is over 3 pts, and less than 6 pts.

With Texas Tech, the std dev is 2.32 and the average prediction is +3.29. By the rules of standard deviations, about 68% of the predictions are between +0.97 and +5.61. The line is at TT +6. So, these 68% of the predictions think TT will cover the 6 points.

Looking back over each of the actual predictions, 30 of 32 predictions think Texas Tech will cover the 6 points. It's very hard to argue with numbers like that.
 

Joe De

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 10, 2002
1,440
1
0
thx...i understand..i show utep as a No. 1 pick..blow them off the chart..but not my best opinion..Nevada comes up strong..and virginia...but i'm leary of this team covering will probably backoff to another play...fyi
 

Jhpga

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 23, 2001
350
0
0
Brentwood,Tn
Djchad.sorry if I dont completley understand your system.But I have LSU as my best game of the week.I have them winning 24-13.And I see you have them winning by 12.5.Why isnt this your strongest play.Just asking!!!Thanks:D
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,739
56
48
Northern Wisconsin
When calculating the average std deviation, do you use all the games or just the ones that have a difference of more than 3?

I added all the std. deviations from the site that MadJack gave us earlier and I got an average of 5.14. This would make Nevada a 3* play, if I am understanding your system.

Would you please comment on this for us? Thanks for doing the work, djchad. Your efforts are appreciated.

Mike
 

Scarecrow

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 26, 1999
181
0
16
Martinez, CA
To T-roe

To T-roe

Hey T-roe,

Just do a search for djchad and you can get his past posts and record for yourself. BTW, his record is excellent!
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,739
56
48
Northern Wisconsin
Djchad, would you please look at my question a few posts up in this thread? I am trying to understand how you calculate the average std deviation. Do you use all the games that were predicted? Or only the ones that have a predicted score average over 3 points different than the line?

I was trying to duplicate your 4.82, but I come up with 5.14, which would make Nevada a 3*.

Thanks for taking the time to post your system. I think it has a lot of merit and I am going to bet some of the plays this weekend.

Mike :)
 

Catdawg

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2002
205
0
0
The Land of 10,000 Lakes
djchad-

I'm sorry I didn't have a chance to see this thread earlier in the year. Great work!

So I know what I'm looking at, I assume a line move in the PSU/OSU game to OSU-5 would knock OSU down to a one * play?

Thanks.
 

finsfan

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 20, 2002
38
0
0
45
Arizona
Where do you get the avg predicted scores?

A guy here at work is doing something similiar as well
 

MasterTX

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 9, 2002
811
1
0
Heleanth...avg of std dev's comes from ALL the plays...I asked the same questions last week, hope that helps!
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,739
56
48
Northern Wisconsin
Thank you, MasterTX. If that is the case, maybe the numbers changed since Wednesday, when Djchad posted. I ran the average a couple of times and came up with 5.14, which, if I understand the system, would make Nevada a 3*.

Good luck to all and thanks to everyone that takes the time to post information that is helpful in handicapping.
 

djchad

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
233
0
0
Melbourne, FL
heleanth,

Sorry I missed replying to you earlier. Yes, I do calculate the average standard deviation from all the plays. However, I remove the standard deviations that are too far away from the average. This week, those deviations that I removed are from the UAB/Army game and the K State/Baylor game. I don't have a hard-set rule on this, but the general guideline is - if a standard deviation is more than twice the average, I do not use that std dev in my average. That is why you and I have a descrepancy. And as you can see, it makes a decent difference (0.32 points in this case).

I do this for one main reason. When a game has a very high standard deviation, say 14 points, then the prediction services have a wide range of predictions. Its like saying 68% of the predictions fall in a 28 point range. 28 points! That's just simply too big of a range.

What I have seen is that when you have a very high standard deviation, the game usually involves a piss poor team. In this case, Army and Baylor. One of the predictions says Army will win by 54.5 points, while another says UAB will win by 41! I can't weed out every single bad prediction, but by not counting the very high standard deviations, I can weed out some of the poorly predicted games.

finsfan,
The page I get the scores from is here

Catdawg,

Yes, if there is a line move, then the star rating must be adjusted. I used the current lines from my book as of Wednesday evening.
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,739
56
48
Northern Wisconsin
Thanks for taking the time to reply to my question, djchad. I understand and I think you're methodology makes sense.

Good luck this weekend and thanks again for going through the trouble of posting this interesting system.
 

djchad

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
233
0
0
Melbourne, FL
Overall a very average (and disappointing) day for the system. The 3-star pick was demolished. Overall 50% of the picks win. 2 of the 4 "wrong team is favored" wins.

Hopefully much better results this coming week. Prelim numbers will be out Monday eve.


<pre>
Favors Line Avg Pred Diff Std Dev Play Result Score
Air Force -17.50 -25.95 8.45 6.15 ** L 26-34
Alabama 2.00 -2.88 4.88 5.39 * W 34-14
Arizona St -3.50 -8.35 4.85 4.60 * W 27-16
Baylor 30.50 27.67 2.83 11.11 - - 10-44
BG -21.00 -23.96 2.96 5.18 - - 38-20
Buffalo 6.50 2.95 3.55 3.65 * W 12-16
Cal 5.50 0.09 5.41 5.48 * L 13-24
Cent Mich 20.50 15.33 5.17 4.95 * W 18-23
Colo St -12.00 -17.53 5.53 4.71 * W 37-10
Idaho 4.00 1.16 2.84 5.10 - - 21-18
Indiana 9.00 1.95 7.05 4.51 *** L 14-45
Iowa St 13.00 7.39 5.61 5.46 * W 10-21
LSU -3.50 -12.51 9.01 5.41 ** L 7-31
NC State -1.00 -3.74 2.74 3.56 - - 38-6
Nevada 4.50 -2.81 7.31 5.00 ** W 47-50
New Mexico 6.00 1.06 4.94 4.96 * W 42-35
Notre Dame 10.00 1.36 8.64 6.85 ** W 34-24
Ohio St -4.50 -10.54 6.04 5.51 ** W 13-7
Rutgers 15.50 12.44 3.06 6.99 * L 14-45
SJ State 16.00 12.88 3.12 6.03 * L 8-45
Texas Tech 6.00 3.29 2.71 2.32 - - 13-37
UAB -8.00 -13.88 5.88 14.78 * L 29-26
UConn 8.00 2.37 5.63 4.24 * W 24-28
UTEP 2.50 -1.31 3.81 7.58 * L 0-20
Va Tech -28.50 -33.28 4.78 7.14 * L 20-10
Virginia 5.50 -1.65 7.15 5.36 ** L 15-23
Wash St -11.00 -16.31 5.31 5.35 * L 21-13
Wisconsin -2.50 -5.45 2.95 3.10 - - 42-24



</pre>


<pre>
Week W L T %
*** 0 1 0 0.000
** 3 3 0 0.500
* 8 7 0 0.533


Season W L T %
*** 7 1 0 0.875
** 13 5 1 0.722
* 36 34 1 0.514
</pre>
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top