Pretty powerful Glenn Beck show

Hard Times

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 17, 2005
809
0
0
Wilson

Wilson

And not one of you dumb fucks have disputed anything that he has presented.

I know you watched. So, don't even try that BS.

There is no concern of what and where these Czars represent? You guys deserve what is coming. The problem is...I don't.

Ya see, I didn't vote this socialist racist into office...you did.

:shrug:

Ya see,I didn't vote this socialist "pig" !!!! But did you vote for Bush in 2000.... which if you did then you'er a damn fool to start your bitching now and this goes for all the damn fools that voted for KING GEORGE in 2000.Then in 2004 if you went for the same shit, well then,you'er just too stupid to understand anything,Bush started this shit, if Bush wasn't the worst, then we wouldn't have OBAMA THE MAGNIFICENT.
You didn't think that when you voted for Bush that you would get OBAMANOMICS... people like you just don't think.
Yes you'er right , you deserve what you get, what's coming that is.
If i was a dumb fulk... like yourself I wouldn't say much... What the fulk are you scared of... you want WAR and you don't want to pay for it, you love the tax break, you'er a damn fool if you don't think that someone has to pay for these illegal WARS...After all , you will spend a trillion plus for the wars with no end in sight, but you wouldn't feed a sick person.... YOU SIR AND ALL THAT VOTED FOR BUSH CAN GO TO HELL, THE SOONER THE BETTER !!!!!!
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
And not one of you dumb fucks have disputed anything that he has presented.

I know you watched. So, don't even try that BS.

There is no concern of what and where these Czars represent? You guys deserve what is coming. The problem is...I don't.

Ya see, I didn't vote this socialist racist into office...you did.

:shrug:

You are calling someone else a dumb fuck?

I think I have heard it all now.
 

godsfavoritedog

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 23, 2002
1,072
29
0
62
Vermont
Obama being elected was nothing more than a backlash to the Bush regime. If there had never been a Bush presidency, there's no way in Hell things would have gotten fucked up enough that people would have ever taken Obama seriously. So whether you voted for Obama or not ... if you voted for Bush in the two elections prior, you're just as responsible for the mess this incompetent bonehead is putting us all in as the fools who voted for him.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Ya see, I didn't vote this socialist racist into office...you did.

:shrug:

When u say something like this it is strange that people would think u are a piece of shit dirtbag with an agenda i might add, when u started the "Can i ask an honest question?" JUst because you can't figure out Glenn Beck is nothing more then a mouth piece for people who con you daily, it doesn't mean a nitwit like yourself can con us with agenda laden thread.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
20,997
224
63
Jefferson City, Missouri
When u say something like this it is strange that people would think u are a piece of shit dirtbag with an agenda i might add, when u started the "Can i ask an honest question?" JUst because you can't figure out Glenn Beck is nothing more then a mouth piece for people who con you daily, it doesn't mean a nitwit like yourself can con us with agenda laden thread.

Sponge, if you took the time to watch Becks shows this week, you would find there are a lot of things that need explaining, if the big news outlets weren't in the tank for Obama, they would be asking these questions.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge, if you took the time to watch Becks shows this week, you would find there are a lot of things that need explaining, if the big news outlets weren't in the tank for Obama, they would be asking these questions.

Skully, if i get a chance i will just get the cliff note versions from Olberman. He will let me know what Beck is lying about. It is to painful to me to watch one of Becks shows unless since he returned from his suspension he has started telling the truth. Skully, i know u don't realize this but most people with a thinking brain, realize that Beck is an insult to one's intelligence
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
20,997
224
63
Jefferson City, Missouri
Skully, if i get a chance i will just get the cliff note versions from Olberman. He will let me know what Beck is lying about. It is to painful to me to watch one of Becks shows unless since he returned from his suspension he has started telling the truth. Skully, i know u don't realize this but most people with a thinking brain, realize that Beck is an insult to one's intelligence

Sponge, I know you don't realize this but most people with a thinking brain, realize that Olberman is an insult to ones intelligence.

:moon:
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
Sponge, I know you don't realize this but most people with a thinking brain, realize that Olberman is an insult to ones intelligence.

:moon:

That may well be, but even more people are aware that Beck is full of shit and an idiot.

Beck is a disc jockey wanna be comedian and you believe everything he tells you.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
It's gonna be good comedy when Glen goes thru his act for the 9/12ers :scared :142smilie :142smilie :142smilie

He is a shill, and he rips off his material from Jones !
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
According to snopes and TVcheck:

Trying to bring back the fairness doctrine would trigger a violent backlash from loud-mouthed radio talk show hosts who actually enjoy the freedom of (and whose livelihoods depend on) saying whatever they damn well please on the air. Why would Obama want to stir up that mob? He won't.

Obama seems to believe that at least part of the answer to the consolidation of the traditional media is not new structural regulations, but in stricter enforcement of the antitrust laws and in maintaining the Internet as a vital and wide-open alternative to traditional media.

The last legislation that allowed more monoply-like media purchases by conglomerates was signed by President Bush in 2003, and has roots back to the Clinton administration.

I see no truth in what Beck said. Prosecutor, your turn.
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
And as for the Czars, Glenn Beck said on his show:

"But let me go back to the czars. There are nearly three dozen of these czars. They don't answer to anybody. They are special advisers to the president. They don't go through a confirmation process. They are advising our president. Who are they? What do they believe? What are they advising the president to do?"

BECK: The czars, they don't answer to anybody. They don't answer to the legislative branch. You know what? You know what the czars look like? The czars almost have a little box around them, just like that.

They don't need to be confirmed by the Senate. They rarely go before committees. They can claim executive privilege when they're asked to testify. They are accountable to no one except the president himself.

But look at the power that we've handed out to these unelected, unconfirmed people. They don't answer to anyone.

He was talking about Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag.

January 13: Orszag testified before the Senate Budget Committee.

January 20: Senate confirmed Orszag's nomination by unanimous consent.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
And not one of you dumb fucks have disputed anything that he has presented.

I know you watched. So, don't even try that BS.

There is no concern of what and where these Czars represent? You guys deserve what is coming. The problem is...I don't.

Ya see, I didn't vote this socialist racist into office...you did.

:shrug:

Wilson, I didn't watch the show, and have no idea what information this is talking about. Do you have a link to it, or an article or something? I'd give you my opinion about his presentation, when I get enough time. I'm guessing it has to do with the Fairness Doctrine or something like that? I've been against radio and television empires being allowed to buy up whatever they want, taking ownership of the complete message in whatever markets they are able to - which started under Bush with Powell's son being appointed and pushing through this allowance. I think this set a dangerous precedent, and we see now how few different messages there are out there at this point. Clear Channel, Murdoch, etc.

Again, any link to the info - I did not watch the show, and have not watched Beck for a very long time. I think he has been a sensationalist since he got his show - which I understand, from a ratings point of view. They all do that, pretty much.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge, I know you don't realize this but most people with a thinking brain, realize that Olberman is an insult to ones intelligence.

:moon:

Nah Skully. Keith is in the no bullshit party which i am a proud member. He also takes shots at Obama. Let me know when Rush, Hannity, or Beck along with the other 90 asshats who do rightwing radio, take a shot at one Republicans. Thanks bud.
 

Wilson

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 8, 2002
4,426
10
0
1813 Virginia St
Wilson, I didn't watch the show, and have no idea what information this is talking about. Do you have a link to it, or an article or something? I'd give you my opinion about his presentation, when I get enough time. I'm guessing it has to do with the Fairness Doctrine or something like that? I've been against radio and television empires being allowed to buy up whatever they want, taking ownership of the complete message in whatever markets they are able to - which started under Bush with Powell's son being appointed and pushing through this allowance. I think this set a dangerous precedent, and we see now how few different messages there are out there at this point. Clear Channel, Murdoch, etc.

Again, any link to the info - I did not watch the show, and have not watched Beck for a very long time. I think he has been a sensationalist since he got his show - which I understand, from a ratings point of view. They all do that, pretty much.

We're halfway through the week and here are just a few of the things we've learned so far:

Congress, beyond not reading these bills, is not even writing these bills. They are being written by a vast network that is not conspiratorial ? it is completely out and wide open ? yet the media refuses to report on them.

Organizations that are filled with socialists, communists, revolutionaries. Organizations that pull their members from legitimate businesses, politicians and from groups that most Americans have never heard of, like Movement for a Democratic Society ? a group started by members of the Communist Party USA, other radicals and Socialists of America.

I have demonstrated these radicals are not only instrumental in shaping legislation that's being jammed through, but are also -- by invitation -- personally advising the president of the United States.

And again the media remains silent.

These are facts ? not opinions. I want to point out the silence; no one has challenged these facts ? they just attack me personally.

Day 3 and the White House remains silent. Yet they have e-mailed my show during the broadcast, only to refute that these people are not "czars," they are "special advisers." One would think if all of this weren't true, they would worry about the labels "communist" or "revolutionary," not "special adviser."

I've also showed you the framework that ? to quote Barack Obama ? is "fundamentally transforming America." But this is much bigger than Barack Obama. Powerful special interest groups began to lay this framework over the last few years.

Remember the Green Jobs Act during the Bush administration? Many on Capitol Hill voted for it because they claimed it was unfunded with meaningless language, tucked into a 900-page bill. Heck, it only asked for $125 million (requested by the special interest group, the Apollo Alliance).

Now, that meaningless, unfunded, green act doesn't have $125 million, but rather $500 million that was ? to use green jobs "czar" Van Jones' word ? "smuggled" into the stimulus bill.

That money is now being funneled by Van Jones (a self-proclaimed revolutionary communist) to organizations and programs of his design and choosing. Oh, and he sits on the board of the Apollo Alliance.

What new "harmless compromises" do we have to look forward to in the health care bills with these radical wolves that are about to devour our republic?

I've told you the three mottos that I have personally adopted: Question with boldness; hold to the truth, and speak without fear.

This information is not being reported on just because the media can't be piece together quickly enough what is happening or they somehow agree with this revolutionary agenda ? but fear also plays a big role. People have too much to lose.

As a recovering alcoholic, I've already lost everything once; I'm better and stronger for it. I didn't need a bailout; I needed to rediscover my principles. I've told my audience for years after I sobered up that I was a dirt-bag ? I try my hardest not to be now, but I still make mistakes. They can take my job or my wealth ? that's OK because I've been rich and I've been poor. But I was only truly miserable when I was lying to myself or others. And because some of those principles that I've rediscovered and applied to my life are the founding principles of this country.

I know that even if the current powers that be succeed in making me poor again, I will only be stronger for it. And American ingenuity will find another way to get this message out on a platform 1,000 times more powerful.

Because of my faith, I know how this story ends: America prepare to witness mighty, powerful miracles in your lifetime.

I am going to offer up evidence that part of the strategy of the fundamental transformation of America is to silence dissent.

Let me show you one of the most diabolical hidden parts of the plan, that quite honestly when I finished my research on it last week, I wrote to a friend that for the first time, I am truly frightened.

It involves the new diversity "czar" at the FCC.

I have told you for a long time: Pay no attention to the Fairness Doctrine that would shut down voices like mine on the radio or voices like mine and Bill O'Reilly on TV. It's too obvious. They will do it through what's called "localism" and "diversity." The final piece of the argument will be against these giant corporate broadcast groups that have too much power (one of which will never be G.E.)

This has been my warning and my theory. A week and a half ago, I began to look into our FCC diversity "czar" Mark Lloyd. In his 2006 book, "Prologue to a Farce: Communications and Democracy in America," Lloyd wrote:

"It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press.... This freedom is all too often an exaggeration.... At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies."

Freedom of speech... is a distraction?

Localism boards are being created. Our diversity "czar" has just proposed that radio companies pay 100 percent of their operating budget, yearly. A 100 percent tax which would then be transferred to the state-run radio of NPR. If you can't pay that, you'd lose your license and it would be sold to minority group.

(In a completely unrelated fact, the FCC just approved the sale of another radio station ? this one on Long Island ? to ACORN.)

Speak without fear.

On global warming, people didn't speak because they didn't want to be seen as a Holocaust denier or a flat-Earther. So they passed "harmless legislation." Now we have half a billion dollars in the hands of a communist revolutionary, who describes his job as:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

VAN JONES, GREEN JOBS CZAR: What I do, to kinda make it simple, I'm basically a community organizer inside the federal government.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

And now because no one in their right mind is against diversity, people will be afraid of being called a racist or a bigot or a hatemonger.

Speak without fear or more "harmless legislation" will be passed and you will not be able to speak and you will experience the kind of fear that no one in this country has experienced before. All it will take is an "emergency."

God help us all.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top