I have switched almost all of my online money to Pinnacle, which I think is the best online sports book (in my experiance)...
For those of you that haven't played on this site, Pinnacle allows you to choose between 5 differant lines, with varying degrees of vig.
So for instance, this evenings UAB-Memphis game, I had the choice to take:
UAB +5 (-120)
UAB +4.5 (-112)
UAB +4 (-104)
UAB +3.5 (+104)
UAB +3 (+112)
I am guessing on the vig, I don't remember specifically, but you get the point. I took UAB +3.
So instead of betting 104/100 to get +4 (which was the line at the time, and for most of the evening), I bet 100/112.
Here is my question: In almost every game, wouldn't it be smartest to give the extra point and take the additional +16 (or whatever the final number is) in vig? Think about it, it is common knowledge that buying points is a big losing proposition in the long wrong, because you are giving 10% or so to get an extra half point/point. So wouldn't it stand to reason that GAINING the extra 10% on EVERY winning bet would be a winning proposition?
I have been trying this out for the last week, and the extra point that I have given has not come into play once, in something like 25 plays.
I realize that I will take a 'beat' that I wouldn't have, every so often by giving an extra point. But since I believe this will happen less than once every 15 plays or so, doesn't this give me a positive expectation for winning?
Not trying to make an arguement for it, although it appears I have done that, I am honestly curious if anyone else has tried this over a long period of time and if this has a positive expectation over the long run... and if so, why don't more people do it?
If there has been discussion about this before, I apologize, I haven't seen it...
Curious to hear opinions... Thanks.
For those of you that haven't played on this site, Pinnacle allows you to choose between 5 differant lines, with varying degrees of vig.
So for instance, this evenings UAB-Memphis game, I had the choice to take:
UAB +5 (-120)
UAB +4.5 (-112)
UAB +4 (-104)
UAB +3.5 (+104)
UAB +3 (+112)
I am guessing on the vig, I don't remember specifically, but you get the point. I took UAB +3.
So instead of betting 104/100 to get +4 (which was the line at the time, and for most of the evening), I bet 100/112.
Here is my question: In almost every game, wouldn't it be smartest to give the extra point and take the additional +16 (or whatever the final number is) in vig? Think about it, it is common knowledge that buying points is a big losing proposition in the long wrong, because you are giving 10% or so to get an extra half point/point. So wouldn't it stand to reason that GAINING the extra 10% on EVERY winning bet would be a winning proposition?
I have been trying this out for the last week, and the extra point that I have given has not come into play once, in something like 25 plays.
I realize that I will take a 'beat' that I wouldn't have, every so often by giving an extra point. But since I believe this will happen less than once every 15 plays or so, doesn't this give me a positive expectation for winning?
Not trying to make an arguement for it, although it appears I have done that, I am honestly curious if anyone else has tried this over a long period of time and if this has a positive expectation over the long run... and if so, why don't more people do it?
If there has been discussion about this before, I apologize, I haven't seen it...
Curious to hear opinions... Thanks.