Scott4USC said:I do not deserve all this attention.
Aside from being the greatest football mind of all-time, he is humble and modest. Wow!
Scott4USC said:I do not deserve all this attention.
The Judge said:Could USC's defense hold their conference opponents to 14.5 points per game if they played in the ACC. How about 8.4 points per game if the Trojans were in the SEC? Yes or no?
My point exactly when I questioned the following statement:Scott4USC said:NO! USC gave up 17pts to Arkansas so USC def. would give up more than 8ppg in the SEC! That is hard core evidence to convince me. I am serious. I think USC would give up 10-20ppg in SEC play.
I have now proven my point to your satisfaction. THAT, my friend is what is known as debating.Scott4USC said:If USC D played in other conferences with Pete Carroll as DC, there is no doubt in my mind USC would be praised by the media for having a top 5 D in the country every single year for the last 4 years!
The Judge said:My point exactly when I questioned the following statement:
I have now proven my point to your satisfaction. THAT, my friend is what is known as debating. Whatever SEC that has held opponents to 8.4ppg padded their stats in OOC as well. Don't forget that!
Case closed.
I am not the one referencing the SEC. I provided comparisons between USC's defense against their own conference and that of all of the other BCS conference leaders. You are the one who choose to focus on Arkansas and LSU.Scott4USC said:What exactly makes the SEC so tough? There are ZERO examples supporting the SEC in any argument. They always come out on the short end of any argument.
I have now proven my point to your satisfaction. THAT, my friend is what is known as debating.
Case closed.
ELVIS said:you cannot continue to talk about how much texas wins by every week. all teams are suspect to play down to their competition. it is difficult to be "up" for every opponent. ie. how many times has usc been trailing at the half this year?
Scott4USC said:That is the problem. That will not get it done against a Pete Carroll defense at USC. Especially if Carroll gets 4 weeks to prepare with his NFL caliber assistant coaching staff. That is what other conf. don't get. USC does not play that brand of football. They prefer to use their superior athletes AND out scheme you with great coaching. Texas has the athletes ($hit load of talent) but not the system. USC can play smash mouth line it up across your man football. They choose NOT too because it is much much more difficult to stop a sophisticated balanced offensive system.
Like you said, the better team will win. We will have to wait and find out. I am just giving my take why USC has the advantage.I am looking for answers to why USC will not win.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.