this is me overthinking things.
looking at brooksby vs evans. the line is practically dead even. both guys are around -300 to win a set. and if you want to bet that the match will only go 2 sets, it's -150. so here's my question... whoever wins the first set... will the other guy still be around -300 to win the 2nd set? or do they normally significantly shift the odds, so that the guy who won the first set is likely to be favored in the 2nd set?
more specifically... i like evans to win a set. but i don't like laying -330. so say he loses the first set, would there usually be a good opportunity to bet evans to win the 2nd set live at a much nicer price?
just curious if you've paid any attention to this and noticed how they adjust the lines after the first set.
looking at brooksby vs evans. the line is practically dead even. both guys are around -300 to win a set. and if you want to bet that the match will only go 2 sets, it's -150. so here's my question... whoever wins the first set... will the other guy still be around -300 to win the 2nd set? or do they normally significantly shift the odds, so that the guy who won the first set is likely to be favored in the 2nd set?
more specifically... i like evans to win a set. but i don't like laying -330. so say he loses the first set, would there usually be a good opportunity to bet evans to win the 2nd set live at a much nicer price?
just curious if you've paid any attention to this and noticed how they adjust the lines after the first set.