Remember this stat when betting....

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
c-note ur correct

c-note ur correct

one team did prove this wrong....BUT 8 proved it right today. Looks like 80% so far. Look, if you came in here to bash that's fine....Kiss my AZZ...I have proven theories in here before and this is another one. I have been on MJ's for many yrs and I am definately not here to lead you astray to some dumbass goose chase. And to answer your question alb Fletcher and I played minor league baseball together. He couldn't carry my jock LMAO...Just teasing, Fletcher was a very good baseball player. I do stand corrected....I looked up my stat and I was wrong guys...It is not 90% is is 80%...I am sorry for the confusion.
 
Last edited:

alb

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 30, 1999
1,871
7
38
Gibraltar
So are you saying that 80% of the time, the team that gets the first lead (after a full inning) wins the game 80% of the time. Sorry if I am reading this wrong but that stat would be nowhere near 80%. I didn't play pro-ball but I know for a fact that stat would be wrong.
 

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
alb ....this is my last post on this

alb ....this is my last post on this

Whomever scores the most runs in their half of the inning wins 80% of the games. It's not that hard to figure out. Fletcher just called and said to STOP replying but I had to have the last word LMAO...guess that's why I was thrown out of so many games. It's an ease form of gambling guys,.....If any team, lets say scores 4 runs in their half of any inning.....you better score 4 or more in any inning to have a chance to win. I'm done Fletcher.....dont call LMAO I won't respond anymore.
 

JMoney

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2006
288
1
0
i understand what you are saying and it makes sense. Although yea it has nothing to do with betting.

btw what was your name?
 

lenniethelock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 24, 2002
655
0
0
53
ohio
remember this whoever scores the most points in a football quarter wins the game 88% of the time.speaking as an ex allpro of course.example
pitt 0,3,35,7
dallas 3,6.2,3
gl guys
 

scott4

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2004
224
0
0
some of the replies are funny. no where did he say this is a system or something to use to make a bet just stated something that you can look at if you are worried about a game winning or not.
 

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
Sorry Fletcher but just proving my point....For Oakland to win they must score atleast 7 or more in any inning to win the game....and for all you who doubted me...check the stats....they all prove likewise.....I am here to win us $$ and ease our minds when the bet is in progress......If you guys would look at it and stop the bashing you might find it as a nice stat.
 

Padre

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 11, 2000
1,183
26
0
San Diego CA
OK i too have to agree with the masses, no factor what so ever on the wager that one is to make on a game.

I havent found anywhere on the net to make a wager that states i will take the team with the most points at the end, for lets say......my house.

just kidding with you skeeter, i only see this as a preventive stat to a heart attack , nothing more.


Maybe it will help in the sense for live betting, but after the NY yanks drop a 7 in the top of the 2nd, hell the live betting odds for the yanks to win are like -4000 or may not even be on the board.

So this stat means nothing to everyone.

As a player maybe, a head thing, you know geez they put a 5 spot on us the last inning we cant recover from that, and then simiply lay down.

but to a bettor, this does nothing for us.

and yes i think we heard you, but it doesnt take logic or some formula to have us settle down in game or have prevent that heart attack, in game.

trust me , if i had the A's 2-nite after that 7 spot, i knew that there was no hope for me. i dont need a stat to tell me that i have taken a beating before the game has ended.
 

c note

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 18, 2002
602
0
0
Albany ny
skeeter.....hope i did not come across the wrong way..my post was not intended to bash your system...i guess i am a little thick headed with this one.....
 

Padre

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 11, 2000
1,183
26
0
San Diego CA
ok after much thought and research , i wasnt happy with 80%, i needed something a little more concrete. lets say 100%.


so i came up with this one, take any away team that scores the last run in an extra innings game.

I think that the percentages are extremely high for this one.


So remember everyone, consider this stat when u handicap. If you dont think that the home team can score the last run in extra innings , you may want to lay off them.
 

NYMess

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2000
383
0
0
Bordentown, NJ
Skeeter,
I have heard of it as being called the Big Bang theory.
The team with the bigger run producing inning usually wins the game.
 

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
Last three days

Last three days

I have it going 17-1...I hope everyone is kicking the bookies butt to start off the year....GL guys
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
SKEETER1 said:
I have it going 17-1...I hope everyone is kicking the bookies butt to start off the year....GL guys


pleaser stop

you're theory has NOTHING TO DO WITH BETTING ON A GAME......it's a worthless proposition and like i said before it's a stat derived after the outcome of the game is over.

but...to update my theory:

the team that scores the most runs wins:

100% so far

hope you are using mine and kicking the books ass
 

tom

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2000
124
0
0
since we are keeping a count on how this "theory" does, I am going to have to say gjn has the better system

100% is awesome!!
blows that 17-1 crap out of the water

Keep up the good work bro!!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top