Rogers discount Tuesday

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,057
137
63
Toronto
I just have time to write down some available lines and Rogers Cable decides to shut down my area for a 4-hour service wastage.

I gave some thought to the games, but haven't got a whole lotta (love) numbers to back much up. What the hell ...

------------------------------------------------
Pirates(D'Amico++)@Expos(Ohka+)
--Ohka won @Pirates 5-2 in last, but was pounded in 2 of previous 3 (interleague); he's allowed 23 hits in 18 IP vs (.324 oba, 3 GS), but owns 2-1 record w/2.00 era; D'Amico beat Expos 7-3 in his last (6 IP, 6h, 2er), is now 3-0 w/2.70 era in 4 career starts vs
--looks like crapshoot w/line; total looks kinda high, to me, especially w/yesterday's 3-0 score

----------------------------------------------------
Marlins(Penny---)@Mets(Leiter+)
--5 of Penny's past 7 were real solid, but 2 of past 3 stunk; Mets roughed him up in last (Angels also, June 8th); HE'S NOW 0-7 IN 10 STARTS VS METS, W/6.96 ERA; Leiter 11-4 in 16 GS vs (4.00 era), including 2 good starts vs back in April, but his last, vs Penny, he allowed 6 walks & 6 hits through 5 (5 er), still got the W, 10-5 (score); Marlins starters reason for recent sweep over D'Rays, as club only scored 8 runs in the 3 games (1 was 6 innings)
--hard not to like Mets here, but hard to like them a lot. Mets appeared to be giving it their all, in last vs Yanks (I got to see this one), but their BP pulled a major comedy routine. Marlins pen average, making the under even less attractive. Over no fun, either, as both starters capable of dominating now and then. I've got a soft spot for Leiter, but his 3.43 career era @Shea has gone up with his 5.31 this year (still 3-1 at home)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillies(Millwood-)@Braves(Ortiz+)
--Can't give too high a probability anytime facing Millwood this year, but Braves have to be favoured after 6-1 Braves win @Veterens w/this matchup; Braves took no mercy on ex-teammate there, so no reason to expect any here. Still, if he's pumped, well ... probably be an under, then. 8.5 looks high except for the Braves offensive #s; Braves scored 6, then 10, then 3 in last series vs O's, @Turner. Ortiz just 3-3 lifetime vs (3.63 in 10 GS), but blanked Philly thru 6 in the 6-1 win; he's 5-2 w/3.72 @Turner this year. Braves or under ... can't see Philly pounding here; they scored 11 in mini 2-game series w/Bosox (22 innings), but much of that was vs joke-of-a-Sox-pen

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brewers(Quevedo+)@Cubs(K-Wood++)
--Quevedo w/some decent career #'s vs Cubs, including 29 K in 29 IP and 2.79 era (.231 oba), but he was smoked at home by Cubs May 13th (6.1, 10h, 6er), getting the L, 2-7.
--gee ... Wood is only 4-5 in 13 career starts vs Brewers, but check out the other numbers: 92 IP, 53 h, 7 HR, 44 BB, 111 K, 2.93 era 1.05 whip, .171 oba. He had 3 outta 5 rough starts recently, before last @Reds, a complete game 3-hitter w/0 BB and 9 K, W 4-1 (Guillen HR). Run-support for Wood has been atrocious this year; he's only 6-5 on the year. Gimme a break.
--price reflects the expected pounding. Run-line looks safe to me. Cubs BP much better also, though Wood only threw 108 pitches vs Reds, and will be working w/5 days rest

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand about indecision
And I don't care if I get behind:rolleyes:
People living in competition
All I want is to have my peace of mind
(Boston-Peace of Mind)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,057
137
63
Toronto
I am sucker for ultra-dominating pitchers; I can't not play this.
PLAY:
Cubs -1.5
1.2/1

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Reds(Haynes)@Cards(Tomko-)
--Haynes is 4-3 w/3.65 era in 10 GS vs, but I notice that most of the Cards current key bats have hit him hard; Tomko is 0-2 in 3 GS vs the team that originally drafted him (Reds) in 2nd round, w/whopping 8.84 era (18.1 IP, 21H, 6HR), but that's not really enough of a sample to suggest that Reds have his #. He survived at Brewers in his last (W8-4) but has been beaten on most of the year. I still like Cards here, maybe at about 60% prob., which makes the present line a crap-shoot. Reds scored 13 in last (3G) series @D'Backs, but just 9 in the previous 4, a series at home vs Cubs. Cards bats quiet in 2 of 3 w/Royals (scored 4, 8, then 2), but have generally been swinging well through a variety of injuries (Rolen @ T.Martinez currently Q, w/Vina & Marrero still out).
--I like Cards here, but better than 60% needed for any value w/current line, while only 42% needed for run-line #, at +140. That would tempt me more. Isringhausen makes Cards BP much more effective.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Astros(Redding-)@D'Backs(Batista+)
--Batista just 1-3 vs Houston despite beating them 4-2 in last (8 IP, 7 h, 2er, 1BB, 7K, vs Redding); he has been sharp vs most current 'stros hitters, w/Kent being one of the few exceptions (Kent has missed past 2 or 3, is it?); Redding had been solid all season until June (threw 1 good game vs D'Rays June 8th, while the other 3 are among the 4 bad starts he's had this season)
--D'Backs offense scoring plenty lately, and they're having a solid home-stand. I liked Astros in the last matchup (the 2-4 loss), and I wouldn't be surprised if they stole this one here. Kent's bat would be more reassuring, but I'd be tempted to peg Astros as a slight favorite here. Batista has been sharp, though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's this spybot virus warning nonsense?
Norton on the job, at least.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a monster on the loose
It's got our heads into the noose
And it just sits there ... watching
(Steppenwolf-Monster)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,057
137
63
Toronto
Speaking of virii, and other chit you don't want on your computer, why is that I keep getting invaded by spyware crap when the only sites I've gone to are:
here,Sportsnetwork,Yahoo,mlb.com,and a few books

I've been avoiding sportsline the past few days, as I have reason to believe that site to be a source. Looks like I need some kinda real-time software protection running; need something not quite a firewall but mean enough to keep the nasties at bay.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rockies(Oliver+)@Padres(Lawrence-)
--I was getting hot to Lawrence very temporarily there, as the Padres managed to 2 of 3 mid-late May starts, but a lack of run-support and BP support appears to have shaken him: his past 5 starts he's surrendered 20 er (35.2 IP, for a 5.11 era over that time); he lasted only 4, taking the L, in a 10-5 Rocks win @Coors last time out; he pitched better @Qualcomm against them on April 11th (W6-4).
--looks like a coin-toss. I'm chilling on Lawrence until he turns things around; might here, as he sports a 3.34 era @Qualcomm this year (4.86 total). Rocks bats might make that tough. Can't say I've cared much for Oliver wherever he's been; got the W in last vs Lawrence, but 5.11 era this year about the same as for his career. BP's here are basically trash, regardless of the combined 5 IP, only 1 run, yesterday. Total will go over if Lawrence isn't much better this time 'round.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dodgers(Perez-)@Giants(Schmidt+)
--Schmidt just 6-6 vs lifetime (4.41era), but dominated Dodgers in last, CG 3-h shutout, 2 BB, 11 K, bringing his season oba down to .198. Pulled a similar move @D.Stadium in April, but meeting vs at home he allowed 4 er in 6 IP on 9 hits - SF still won 5-4, no decision for Schmidt. Perez has looked okay in 2 vs this year, but lack of production saw him go 0-2, including last vs Schmidt (2-0 SF).
--Schmidt has really impressed this year. Perez has not been as good as he was last year. Both clubs prefer facing lefties, as well, which only helps SF here. Big extra-inning win by SF yesterday, after blowing late 2-0 lead, also suggests a follow-up W here. High probability SF wins here, but line pretty much says see-ya to any value, -180 requiring 65% minimum. +110 runline looks tastier, as 4-5 SF runs may cover it (is only 4 days rest for Schmidt, mind you, and he threw 127 in last ... was Giants pen that blundered yesterday (closer Worrell))

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AL thoughts must to be shorter
I need a wake-up call here

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
But I would not feel so all alone ...
(Bob Dylan-Rainy Day Woman #12 & #35)
 

sashi patel

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2003
793
0
0
Denver, Colorado
Extrapolater,

Thanks for the great info.

Does the home-road records of Montreal-Pittsburgh sway you in favor of this game?

Montreal home 25-13
Pittsburgh road 18-19

~Patel
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,057
137
63
Toronto
Excuse the lack of AL babbling...
my Rogers internet service has been nowhere-to-be-found since sometime before noon. Supposed to be a technician coming out tomorrow, and now I don't know whether I should cancel or what.

Just gave me time to get in my Cubs play.
Was thinking of adding Bosox & Cards run-lines, so just as well.

I haven't even looked at tomorrow's yet (came here first, is that dedication, or what?).

Rock on.
(D.Essex)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,057
137
63
Toronto
P.S.

sorry, sashi, normally I answer questions if I'm around (try to, anyway) but I have been disconnected, as mentioned.

I'll have a look at tomorrow's, but I probably won't even comment much unless I see something glaring.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top