ROSIE AT IT AGAIN

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,739
245
63
54
BG, KY, USA
Elisabeth wins that round. Rosie, as she said, is a big, fat, lesbian pig. One of the first things I've ever agreed with her on.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,922
2,071
113
On the course!
That shit is just wrestling for women! They pick a "hero", and root away.

If it was real, that hot chick would have answered the question by saying, "I don't know what you think anymore.......I only know what you said, and that is that American soldiers are terrorists."
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Elisabeth wins that round. Rosie, as she said, is a big, fat, lesbian pig. One of the first things I've ever agreed with her on.

Six im not a fan of Rosies but the bottom line is you fall for the same spin Hasselback falls for and they spun her words and Hassleback was a coward because she wouldn't say they did. She never said the troops were terrorist and its despicable for people to even suggest she did but hey that is how the people you support roll. They did it to Kerry and like puppets you all run with it. Go figure. If this was such a good friend of hers she would have agreed with Rosie and it would have been over. I see a nice job at Fox News awaiting ole Lizzy when she leaves the view because no legitimate news organization would ever higher her. I couldn't imagine what it must feel like to hear every rightwing wackjob out there spinning my words when they know very well she meant Bush was the terrorist. These things really look simple to me to figure out but i guess this type of politics works. Keep on believing these clowns. You would figure after the one religious fella left the party and wrote the book tempted faith you would have picked it up and read it. The books basic premise is on how he as well as others were conned into falling for this parties con jobs. To each his own.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,922
2,071
113
On the course!
Six im not a fan of Rosies but the bottom line is you fall for the same spin Hasselback falls for and they spun her words and Hassleback was a coward because she wouldn't say they did.


What were the words, and how were they "spun"?
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
What were the words, and how were they "spun"?

yyz listen to the video she explains it. Look she is famous for sticking her foot in her mouth but her words were spun to make her look bad because this is what the GOP is excellent at doing. They go after anyone that has the ability to voice an opinion opposite of theirs. Since it works they do it over and over again. She meant our Gov't was the terroist not the troops.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,484
160
63
Bowling Green Ky
Maybe Sponge would like to explain this interview when lady say's terrorist are killing people and she says so are our troops--
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f12_1179782856&c=1

Then he can defend his other political comrades--Micheal Moore in Cuba and Glover in Venezalu doing their promotional tours on the world that hates us ;)

--and speaking of puppets I'll search for cartoon I saw of Soros-Moveon and code pink as puppet masters pulling strings on Obama-Edwards and Clinton--They looked cool as puppets hopping about:)
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,922
2,071
113
On the course!
yyz listen to the video she explains it. Look she is famous for sticking her foot in her mouth but her words were spun to make her look bad because this is what the GOP is excellent at doing. They go after anyone that has the ability to voice an opinion opposite of theirs. Since it works they do it over and over again. She meant our Gov't was the terroist not the troops.

How do you know? That's the point I am making here. All the big bitch had to do was SAY THAT! She refuses to!

So......when you want to speak in ambiguous terms, people are allowed to interpret them to some extent.

She had every opportunity to say exactly what she meant, and kept doing the old Takriti Two-Step.


If you are allowed to assume she meant the government......others must be allowed to assume she meant troops. Only she can clear it up, and she won't. Thus, she can live with the fallout.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Maybe Sponge would like to explain this interview when lady say's terrorist are killing people and she says so are our troops--
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f12_1179782856&c=1

Then he can defend his other political comrades--Micheal Moore in Cuba and Glover in Venezuela doing their promotional tours on the world that hates us ;)

First dog like you do so well but normal people always realize, nothing in that video said anything you wrote. Two Michael Moore got caught up in the republican slim machine because again he voiced an opinion which was true but they didn't like it. Three our problems with Chavez began when he wanted to give our poor free oil. This is a big no no because the big thieves in our country the oil companies would lose money. So now he is the bad guy. Gover? I couldn't careless what actor or actress goes where. Its called dialog and since we are so hated around the country now when we were in fact loved after 9/11, maybe it is a good thing someone goes over there and shows not all Americans are clueless.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
How do you know? That's the point I am making here. All the big bitch had to do was SAY THAT! She refuses to!

So......when you want to speak in ambiguous terms, people are allowed to interpret them to some extent.

She had every opportunity to say exactly what she meant, and kept doing the old Takriti Two-Step.


If you are allowed to assume she meant the government......others must be allowed to assume she meant troops. Only she can clear it up, and she won't. Thus, she can live with the fallout.

yyz her beef was that she wanted a friend on the opposite side of the political circles to come out and show how they spun her words but Lizzy wouldn't. She knows what is being said about her is a lie but hearing it from a friend on the other side would have ended it. I see your point and probably after thinking about it more she will say it but her goal was for a friend to admit what they were doing to her and Elizabeth wouldn't.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
How do you know? That's the point I am making here. All the big bitch had to do was SAY THAT! She refuses to!

So......when you want to speak in ambiguous terms, people are allowed to interpret them to some extent.

She had every opportunity to say exactly what she meant, and kept doing the old Takriti Two-Step.


If you are allowed to assume she meant the government......others must be allowed to assume she meant troops. Only she can clear it up, and she won't. Thus, she can live with the fallout.

very well said yyz...only rosie can clear up what rosie meant.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,922
2,071
113
On the course!
yyz her beef was that she wanted a friend on the opposite side of the political circles to come out and show how they spun her words but Lizzy wouldn't. She knows what is being said about her is a lie but hearing it from a friend on the other side would have ended it. I see your point and probably after thinking about it more she will say it but her goal was for a friend to admit what they were doing to her and Elizabeth wouldn't.

Sponge,

I am including a piece that has the original statement in it. You only need to watch the first 1:00...the rest is just debate from that news show.

Now, I want anyone out there to tell me why the fuk that other gal needs to "stand up for Rosie"? She was asked point blank, "Who are you calling terrorists?"

Either way, she is calling the troops, or the United States, as a whole, "terrorists". In no way, shape, or form, are her words being twisted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNhIp44bmZY
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge is sticking up for Rosie!!!!!:mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

:

This has nothing to do about Rosie and everything to do with people being slapped down and words being spun when they have a different opinion than this administration. sorry bro you have this wrong
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,850
655
113
49
TX
Rosie in her younger days... :fit01: :mj02:

Can't stand that dyke...

Elizabeth is the only woman on that show that has any thought provoking comments. And she is usually right.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge,

I am including a piece that has the original statement in it. You only need to watch the first 1:00...the rest is just debate from that news show.

Now, I want anyone out there to tell me why the fuk that other gal needs to "stand up for Rosie"? She was asked point blank, "Who are you calling terrorists?"

Either way, she is calling the troops, or the United States, as a whole, "terrorists". In no way, shape, or form, are her words being twisted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNhIp44bmZY

Again yyz you are listening to the panel which the big Republican said she said the troops were terrorist. He said it about fifty times in that piece. "Rosie say's the troops are terrorist". Rosies say's the troops are terrorist" Now you show me where she say's those exact same words. I haven't heard them yet. All i hear is people trying to figure out what she might have said. Again show me those words coming out of her mouth. Don't show me what everyone thinks she might have meant. She is calling our gov't the terrorist and since they attacked someone who did absolute dick to us maybe she is right. Look if she vanished tomorrow i wouldn't give two shits but this administration time and time again spins peoples words. People who have a platform and the ability to challenge them. Could she have used better words? Sure. Same as Kerry.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,922
2,071
113
On the course!
Sponge.....now you're doing a great job of spin. I asked a simple question, and you danced around it ever so "Rosie apologetically".

I did not "listen to the panel"! In fact.....I told you to watch the first minute of the tape, and forget the debate that ensued. I don't even care about the lead in where he says she called the troops terrorists. Only listen to the bit between Rosie and Elizabeth!

A. She is calling someone terrorists.

B. It's either the soldiers, or the United States.

C. She is given the chance to explain.

D. She, much like you, continues to avoid what she said, and leave it ambiguous!


Aren't "terrorists" people? I have always thought so. I mean, when I think of "terrorists" killing people.......I don't think of the political affiliation behind it right away, do you?

Terrorists=people
People=soldiers

You connect the dots.


Again......If she meant something specific, she should have cleared the air on one of the MANY occasions she has had, rather than accuse the other gal of throwing her under the bus, because she hates her political stance.

Weak, chicken shit stuff.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top