Rubio to Obama: Call me maybe?

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,443
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Rubio to Obama: Call me maybe?

<CITE class="byline vcard">
blogger-moody-40_040441.jpg
transparent-95031.png
By Chris Moody, Yahoo! News
Political Reporter





By Chris Moody, Yahoo! News | The Ticket ? <ABBR title=2012-06-18T20:14:21Z>1 hr 53 mins ago</ABBR></CITE>


Marco Rubio (Alan Diaz/AP)In an ABC News interview scheduled for broadcast Monday night, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio responds to President Barack Obama's recent announcement that his administration won't enforce certain deportation laws related to young illegal immigrants, accusing the president of delaying long-term solutions for immigration reform.



Rubio is championing his own initiative that would provide non-immigrant visas to children of parents who came to the county illegally if they serve in the military or graduate from college, but his work on the measure was largely derailed by Obama's announcement.
"I'm trying to find a solution here, not a talking point. I'm trying to find an answer here, not a bumper-sticker slogan," Rubio said in an interview with ABC News' David Muir. "The president's is a two-year solution that expires after two years and does not really solve this in a lasting way. It just gets him through the election. ... The White House never called us about this. No one reached out to us and told us this was on its way. And, I mean, if they were serious about a real solution to this problem and not politicizing it, then why don't you reach out to people?"
The full interview, in which he discusses rumors that he will be tapped as Mitt Romney's running mate and former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's media treatment in 2008, will premiere Monday on "World News with Diane Sawyer" at 6:35 p.m. ET.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Mitt Romney was asked during his interview with Fox News on Monday to address once again President Barack Obama's decision to stop deporting undocumented youth who have graduated from high school or served in the military. And for the second time in as many days, he stayed vague on whether or not he would rescind the order upon taking office.

?You know, we will see kind of what the calendar looks like at that point and I am not going to tell which items will come first, second, or third," Romney said, according to transcripts released by Fox News. "What I can tell you is that those people who come here by virtue of their parents bringing them here, who came in illegally, that?s something I don?t want to football with as a political matter."

As was the case with Romney's CBS "Face the Nation" interview on Sunday, this was a largely evasive answer. And Fox News' Carl Cameron, sensing that evasion, asked why the presumptive Republican nominee was fine saying he'd repeal Obamacare but unwilling to say as much about this quasi-Executive Order.

?Well, when we talk about illegal immigration I think I want to start by saying we need to secure the border, we?ve got to have an employment verification system, and then with regards to these children who came here brought in by their parents who came in here illegally, how we deal with them is something I think that deserves a long term solution and I don?t think we go jumping from one solution to the other," Romney replied. "The president I think made a mistake by putting out there what he called a stop-gap measure; I think that?s not the right way to go. I?m not going to be looking for stop gap-measures; I?m going to be looking for a permanent or a long-term solution that?s something I will start on day one. Actually, as soon as I get elected hopefully, I will start working on this issue and hopefully be ready to go immediately.?
...........................................................

:142smilie :142smilie

homeny homennyy homenyyy


come on Willard spit it out.

Obama takes his immigration fire.

maybe he wont need Rubio now
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Yeh just like George W did over and over

like when he invaded Iraq over WMD.

what a joke that was

Maybe all Presidents do it and you have just decided that Obama has cornered the market.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
O?DONNELL: So what will the athlete in the family be doing in the Olympics?


ROMNEY: So she's quite thrilled and I'm sure she'll be watching. I have a campaign to attend to, so I won't be able to see it perform. But I'm very pleased for her.

O?DONNELL: That's right. The Romney family definition of an Olympic athlete is a person who participates in the purchase of an Olympic athlete, in this case, a horse that the Romneys own. Now, Mitt Romney has always told the story of the family's entry into the breathtakingly expensive so-called sport of dressage as a therapeutic option for Ann Romney?s multiple sclerosis.

SCHIEFFER: Dressage?

ROMNEY: Yes, it?s the sport of dressage. Not many people are familiar with it, but something for which she has a passion, and frankly, her getting back on a horse after she was diagnosed with MS was able, she's convinced, to help her regenerate her strength and renew that vigor.

O?DONNELL: Now, this is not in any way to make light of Ann Romney?s difficulty with MS, it's obviously a very difficult thing to bear. And there are a lot of things you can do to try to deal with MS. But, come on, dressage does not appear in any of the more traditional courses of treatment. And if it's true that dressage is how wildly rich people deal with this very difficult personal health problem, then why, why does the horse appear on Mitt Romney?s tax return as a business expense, that in 2010 produced a $77,000 business deduction. Not a healthcare deduction, a business deduction for the Romney Limited Liability Corporation that owns the horse as a business.

Mitt Romney was afraid to identify a single tax deduction that he would eliminate or reduce, but I think we can be sure that the Olympic athlete in the Romney family, the horse that masquerades as Ann?s horse, but that is never actually ridden by Ann, would continue to be a fake deductible business expense if Mitt and Ann ever get to watch their Olympic athlete on a TV in the White House.

...............................................................

In other words Willard has no other way to explain away the million he spent on a dressage horse , supplys, travel, trainers, et all except to say that it helps his wife Ann with her MS.


He is sending the horse to England on a slow boat for the Olympics.

Man it must be nice to have gabillions.

Its pretty sad to think this guy is running for
President.

Cant we just get Ron Paul and be done with it.

:scared
 
Last edited:

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,443
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Yeh just like George W did over and over

like when he invaded Iraq over WMD.

what a joke that was

Maybe all Presidents do it and you have just decided that Obama has cornered the market.

Not so fast Scooter. :nono:

Iraq ResolutionLast updated 25 days ago


<!-- /firstHeading --><!-- bodyContent --><!-- tagline -->From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<!-- /tagline --><!-- subtitle -->
<!-- /subtitle --><!-- jumpto -->Jump to: navigation, search
<!-- /jumpto --><!-- bodycontent -->Not to be confused with Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists or Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 1991.

President George Bush, surrounded by leaders of the House and Senate, announces the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, October 2, 2002.


The Iraq Resolution or the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,<SUP id=cite_ref-ResolutionText_0-0 class=reference>[1]</SUP> Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing military action against Iraq
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
HOLLAND, Mich. ? Mitt Romney says Florida. Sen. Marco Rubio is being "thoroughly vetted" for vice president.

Romney says Marco Rubio being 'thoroughly vetted' for vice presidential consideration

The comments came Tuesday amid reports by ABC News and The Washington Post citing unnamed advisers that Rubio isn't being vetted for the No. 2 spot on the GOP ticket.

Romney told reporters Tuesday evening that he "can't imagine" who the advisers are. He says the reports are false.

.....................................................

Willard dont need no Ricky Recardo no more.

Obama took his Latino thunder from him

Spanish ppl dislike the Cuban Rubio.

They will not vote for Willard based on picking Rubio as VP

Besides what about the fawking birth certifiicate that he refuses to divulge.

wtf

And secret meetings with Fidel and Rubio along with paid dinners.

wtf

From what I am hearing Willard and Rubio may turn the US into a communist state.

holy chit :scared
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Not so fast Scooter. :nono:

Iraq ResolutionLast updated 25 days ago


<!-- /firstHeading --><!-- bodyContent --><!-- tagline -->From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<!-- /tagline --><!-- subtitle -->
<!-- /subtitle --><!-- jumpto -->Jump to: navigation, search
<!-- /jumpto --><!-- bodycontent -->Not to be confused with Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists or Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 1991.

President George Bush, surrounded by leaders of the House and Senate, announces the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, October 2, 2002.


The Iraq Resolution or the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,<SUP id=cite_ref-ResolutionText_0-0 class=reference>[1]</SUP> Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing military action against Iraq

...........................................................

Ronnie

if you believe that I got some swampland in Florida for sale.

Why cant George W travel outside the US ?

answer that one.

can yu say war criminal.

damnnnnnnnn.........
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Marco Rubio not even being considered for VP? That would be political malpractice from the Romney campaign. But that's the word coming from high-placed campaign sources, according to ABC's Jonathan Karl.

Aside from placing a serious damper on Rubio's book tour for his new memoir "American Son," the statement doesn't make a lot of sense. In any back-of-the-napkin list of VP considerations, Rubio certainly should be on the short list, along with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Ohio Sen. Rob Portman.

Why? Swing state power, generational balance and a much needed dose of diversity that can help close the critical Latino gap that strongly favors President Obama over Mitt Romney.



John P. Avlon

Not including Marco Rubio even in the vetting process is a needless insult that indicates either over-confidence in Romney's prospects in Florida or a decision to pursue another path to 270 electoral votes. Alternately, maybe it means Jeb Bush is back in the VP consideration set.

Yes, picking Rubio would contain some risks in the post-Palin world. He's been a U.S. senator for less than two years, but he previously led the Florida state legislature, where he helped shepherd Jeb Bush's legislative agenda. And he would provide enthusiasm for Romney, especially among the tea party set, and he could help tip as many as three critical swing states -- not just Florida but Hispanic-rich Nevada and New Mexico, with a cool 40 electoral votes between them.









The expanded list of possible Romney VP nominees could be rounded out to include Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan and freshman New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte.

The Romney camp has been trying to bait reporters with the idea that it could announce a veep pick well in advance of the Tampa convention, but what's the hurry? Better to do it right and at least cultivate the impression of the GOP with a deep bench of diversity and talent than just offering up an old white guy sandwich without thinking.

Rubio is a rising star in the Republican Party who will likely impact American politics for decades to come.

Advancing him to VP might be going too far too fast, especially for the quintessentially sober-minded Romney. But ignoring the real benefits Rubio could bring to the Republican ticket doesn't make a whole lot of sense, except for the Obama camp, which will likely breathe a sigh of relief if they don't have to juggle their strategy to deal with such an audacious, electoral-map adjusting move.

.........................................................

they cant find his fawking birth certificate :scared
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
Not so fast Scooter. :nono:

Iraq ResolutionLast updated 25 days ago


<!-- /firstHeading --><!-- bodyContent --><!-- tagline -->From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<!-- /tagline --><!-- subtitle -->
<!-- /subtitle --><!-- jumpto -->Jump to: navigation, search
<!-- /jumpto --><!-- bodycontent -->Not to be confused with Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists or Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 1991.

President George Bush, surrounded by leaders of the House and Senate, announces the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, October 2, 2002.


The Iraq Resolution or the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,<SUP id=cite_ref-ResolutionText_0-0 class=reference>[1]</SUP> Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing military action against Iraq

Does this thing still think Iraq was a good idea? :142smilie :142smilie

Romneys horse deduction sounds like more Republican Welfare. You got a comment Skul? Oh yeah, why doesn't Romney answer the question on Obamas Illegal Alien statement?

Romney another empty suit!
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,443
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Oh yeah, why doesn't Romney answer the question on Obamas Illegal Alien statement?
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/B3HB96NeMUE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The question is why did Obama break the LAW.

Does this thing still think Iraq was a good idea?

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Cwqh4wQPoQk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ask these people StevieD, they thought it was a good ideal.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
Oh yeah, why doesn't Romney answer the question on Obamas Illegal Alien statement?
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/B3HB96NeMUE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The question is why did Obama break the LAW.

Does this thing still think Iraq was a good idea?

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Cwqh4wQPoQk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ask these people StevieD, they thought it was a good ideal.

Hey Dumbfuc, they only gave the President the right to usde force if necessary. As against that invasion as I was from the beginning even I agreed with that vote. When the President asks for the right to attack I would think it is an automatic yes. Considering that at the time we did not know that we had a lying pysco madman in the white house.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,443
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Hey Dumbfuc, they only gave the President the right to usde force if necessary. As against that invasion as I was from the beginning even I agreed with that vote. When the President asks for the right to attack I would think it is an automatic yes. Considering that at the time we did not know that we had a lying pysco madman in the white house.

Hey STUPID FUCK, did Bush follow the LAW? TIA STUPID FUCK.


:0008
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
Hey STUPID FUCK, did Bush follow the LAW? TIA STUPID FUCK.


:0008

What law, I am sure if he was not going to follow a law he would of had it changed!

So, you think Iraq has worked out well for the US?
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,443
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
What law, I am sure if he was not going to follow a law he would of had it changed!

So, you think Iraq has worked out well for the US?

It's simple, both parties thought Hussein had WMD, the Liberal News Media has given cover to the Democrats on their role in the war, the Blame Bush crowd is NEVER accountable for their actions.


Carry on with the FRAUD.

:0008
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
It's simple, both parties thought Hussein had WMD, the Liberal News Media has given cover to the Democrats on their role in the war, the Blame Bush crowd is NEVER accountable for their actions.


Carry on with the FRAUD.

:0008

First of all the Corporate Media sold the war to the American people. Certain fools, like yourself, still believe the hype. You also still believe there is a Liberal Media. You are such a tool and one of the main reasons this country finds itself in the mess it is in. You should be ashamed of yourself and the lies you believe.

You never answered my question, not a surprise, but do you think Iraq was a good idea. Was all those Democrats and Bush right or were the Democrats and Bush wrong?
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top