Rule question

inzone

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 28, 2005
195
0
0
Hey does anyone know if Jackson touched the pylon when his second foot went out of bounds?

Is that a touchdown? I still dont get why they didnt review that play.
 

Penguinfan

Thread banned
Forum Member
Dec 5, 2001
10,393
190
0
Vanished into vortex
You know what, with all the whining and crying about correct calls in this game I can't believe this hasn't been brought up already. It kind of looked to me like his second foot touched that pylon, which is in play and I believe should be called a TD.

The foot he initially touched with came up and kicked the pylon afterwards, but in the maen time I think just maybe his other foot grazed that pylon.
 

pt1gard

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 7, 2002
7,377
3
0
seattle
i cant believe they never reviewed it, but i rewatched it on dvd and his first foot was OB so it was not a TD ... but it got no PT on screen
 

Dice34

Off parole
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2004
4,731
27
0
D.O.C.
I dunno it was close, but if his right foot did graze the pylon, then yeah it should of been a TD......Why people didn't really bring it up is most likely they forgot about it b/c ABC didn't really take a good look at it with IR.....

I got a ?.......Close to the end of the first half after the play above..... Hasselbeck threw a ball down the sideline and the WR jumped for the ball but was clearly out of bounds and the Steelers DB laid a hit on him.......I thought that would of been a penalty b/c the WR was out of bounds even though he never had possession in bounds...But my friend disagreed? What is the right call in that instance?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top