Avalanche
First of all, you are then in the minority who think the SEC had a down year. Your statements still support my claim. If you think the SEC had down year, and the Pac 10 had a down year, then why did LSU only beat out USC by .15 BCS pts? If the SEC is so superior, wouldn't LSU final BCS standings have a much larger margin vs USC? LSU is an SEC team while poor little USC is a Pac 10 team, and if both conferences had down years, wouldn't that put both on level playing field? Therefore since you say the SEC is so superior, and both conferences having down years, wouldn't LSU final BCS standings be a lot higher? :shrug:
Let me spell it out to you. LSU is from the SEC, and USC is from the Pac 10. Both teams had 1 loss and LSU barely edged USC out in the final BCS standing by .15 pts. VERY SMALL MARGIN. But you go and say how superior the SEC is to the Pac 10, yet, LSU only beat out USC by .15 pts and needed MAJOR help in doing so. You cannot explain that? THIS IS A VERY VALID ARGUMENT!
I am not the idiot. Read my post again and read yours, and you will see who is the idiot. :banghead: You cannot read and comprehend. In my post I said the PAC 10 had a DOWN YEAR. What does that mean? THAT MEANS IT HURT USC SOS!!!!!!!! You cannot comprehend that? Then i said, on top of that, USC OOC opponents tanked (which they did).
Why did I bring up USC OOC opponents? BECAUSE LSU ONLY EDGED OUT USC by .15 BCS PTS, and I did not want you to say or think that only reason USC was so close was because of their OOC opponents. If USC OOC opponents tanked, and the Pac 10 had down year, that STRENGTHENS MY ARGUMENT and WEAKENS YOURS! An SEC team playing in such a superior conference (as YOU say), should have had a much larger margin in the BCS standings. CORRECT??? Or maybe the SEC is not so superior? POINT BEING, USC OOC opponents HURT USC not helped USC, so explain why LSU was "only" .15 BCS pts ahead of USC if they play in such a superior conference? Remember, majority think the SEC had a good year last season, some say great year, but at the very least an average year. You are in the minority thinking they had a down year, but that is ok, because it still proves my argument.
Read carefully, I DID NOT! :nono:
First of all, you are then in the minority who think the SEC had a down year. Your statements still support my claim. If you think the SEC had down year, and the Pac 10 had a down year, then why did LSU only beat out USC by .15 BCS pts? If the SEC is so superior, wouldn't LSU final BCS standings have a much larger margin vs USC? LSU is an SEC team while poor little USC is a Pac 10 team, and if both conferences had down years, wouldn't that put both on level playing field? Therefore since you say the SEC is so superior, and both conferences having down years, wouldn't LSU final BCS standings be a lot higher? :shrug:
Let me spell it out to you. LSU is from the SEC, and USC is from the Pac 10. Both teams had 1 loss and LSU barely edged USC out in the final BCS standing by .15 pts. VERY SMALL MARGIN. But you go and say how superior the SEC is to the Pac 10, yet, LSU only beat out USC by .15 pts and needed MAJOR help in doing so. You cannot explain that? THIS IS A VERY VALID ARGUMENT!
I am not the idiot. Read my post again and read yours, and you will see who is the idiot. :banghead: You cannot read and comprehend. In my post I said the PAC 10 had a DOWN YEAR. What does that mean? THAT MEANS IT HURT USC SOS!!!!!!!! You cannot comprehend that? Then i said, on top of that, USC OOC opponents tanked (which they did).
Why did I bring up USC OOC opponents? BECAUSE LSU ONLY EDGED OUT USC by .15 BCS PTS, and I did not want you to say or think that only reason USC was so close was because of their OOC opponents. If USC OOC opponents tanked, and the Pac 10 had down year, that STRENGTHENS MY ARGUMENT and WEAKENS YOURS! An SEC team playing in such a superior conference (as YOU say), should have had a much larger margin in the BCS standings. CORRECT??? Or maybe the SEC is not so superior? POINT BEING, USC OOC opponents HURT USC not helped USC, so explain why LSU was "only" .15 BCS pts ahead of USC if they play in such a superior conference? Remember, majority think the SEC had a good year last season, some say great year, but at the very least an average year. You are in the minority thinking they had a down year, but that is ok, because it still proves my argument.
Read carefully, I DID NOT! :nono:
