SAT NITE HT PLAYS

[Randercity]

BUCKS +3 & Under 92 ** DOUBLE PLAYS **

The ROCKETS are on a back to back and although MILW is without REDD, I can see them shooting better than 36% from the field in 2H of this one. Still going with the Under as both teams are content playing at snails pace, there has been few TO's, fewer fast breaks, and they combined for 79 total pts despite HOU hitting 50% FG. Go BUCKS in 2H, play ALOT of D and keep this one way below the closing number....

G/L :SIB

 

[yyz]

Houston team over 47 2nd half

2 units

 

[Randercity]

NUGGETS OVER 103.5 ** DOUBLE PLAY **

G/L :SIB

 

[Randercity]

Normally, I would be on the NUGGETS in this situation, but with a gimpy CARMELO and NO CAMBY, I'm not sure DENVER can win this game. They are the better team, playing at home, and CHAR is without WALLACE their best player. However, someone forgot to tell the BOBCATS that they can't win this game... They hit 61% in the FH and since DEN is so used to letting guards and small forwards go past them since the rubber man CAMBY is camping in the post ready to swat away, it could be anothe layup drill for CHAR. I definitely think DEN comes back, just maybe not enough but they will shoot better. 91 shots in the FH shows they are running, we just need DENVER to start gunning and hitting.

Good luck! :SIB

 

[Randercity]

:shrug: I fricking give up.....

22 pts in 2:45???? :scared This game "looked" in the bag as MILW held a 37-36 2H advantage with less than 3 minutes to go. (just saw the LOWLIGHTS on ESPN - it was 78-74 HOU with 2:45 to go!) I figure at WORST I have a split, but there's a great chance I win both. HOU goes on a 8-0 or 10-0 run, and suddenly I need luck to just split. BUT, not to be... MILW in all their wisdom starts fouling late when down by 8, and they end up losing the 2H by 3 to push, and end at 95 for the half. I'm sorry, I hate to bitch all the time, but this is like FIVE shitters in 2 nights without me getting a break. PORT going OT last night didn't help me. I had PORT 2H and that won with them losing, the only thing OT did was give me a push on the 2H total.:shrug:

 

[Randercity]

:SIB Well.... maybe not! :142smilie

SONICS -3.5 *** TRIPLE PLAY ***

I was stupid and played DEN OVER instead of playing the better team at home to come back, but I won't do it again. NY has been on a long west coast swing and are playing their 3rd in 4 I believe, and they have stayed close in the 1H, actually leading now twice, but have yet to win. Last night's gut wrencher has to be fresh in mind, and I can't see SEA losing this one at home.

Good luck! :SIB

 

[Randercity]

KINGS -5 -105 ** DOUBLE PLAY **

KINGS were down early, came on strong to take the HT lead despite CHI hitting for 60% from the field.... if you hit over 60% FG in FH and are down by 3, how's the 2H gonna look??? :nono: I like the KINGS to go 2-0 this weekend at home. SAC is looking like a playoff team now that they are healthy, too bad they play in the West... no chance for them this year.

 

[Randercity]

Sorry yyz.... good job on your win! :00hour

I knew one of us HAD to lose, the math didn't work, but I can't believe you felt you had a prayer when you needed 12 PTS by JUST your team with less than 3 to go.... not when you have the lead. They should be working clock and just trying to get the road win, but hey, you won... congrats!

 

[77sticks]

:SIB Well.... maybe not! :142smilie

SONICS -3.5 *** TRIPLE PLAY ***

I was stupid and played DEN OVER instead of playing the better team at home to come back, but I won't do it again. NY has been on a long west coast swing and are playing their 3rd in 4 I believe, and they have stayed close in the 1H, actually leading now twice, but have yet to win. Last night's gut wrencher has to be fresh in mind, and I can't see SEA losing this one at home.

Good luck! :SIB

Nice Call..Knicks seem like a great fade in the 2nd half. I hope they lead more games at HT.