sat total

CryBoy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2000
2,853
27
48
Arlington, TX
I have vowed after Game 1 never to bet under the total for the remainder of this series. However, this is Game 7. Teams are more cautious in their approach on offense. It won't be run and jack up 3's like in the first few of the series, even for these two gazelles. All you need 1 poor quarter to get the under.

Best of luck tonight.

You've convinced me to put a unit on the under.
 

49erCurtis

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 7, 2000
606
0
0
51
Queen City, NC
on the contrary ...

on the contrary ...

... game six pt total after one period = 45

that's a pretty bad qtr for these two teams ... they still crushed the total of 217 ...

over or nothing!!
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
yeah 45 in the 1st quarter of game 6:

Sac had 0 3:45 into the game
Sac had 6 at the 6 minute mark
Sac had around 55 at half.

OVER OR NOTHING (and I usually favor unders in game 7's)

Remember Portland/Dallas game 7 had about 207 points. 10 more for these two is attainable.
 

CryBoy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2000
2,853
27
48
Arlington, TX
Curtis

Curtis

You're right. One bad quarter by the gazelles here does not guarantee an under. However, I will stick with my Game 7 theory of cautious offense and better defense. Total is just way too high for a Game 7.

Best of luck and see you at the half.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
The slowdown
The defense
The 6-35 start for the Kings
91 at half
and there were still 211 points scored?

One more bucket by Sactown in the last 3 mins, could lead to a desperate foul or two might that may have pushed this game over. AMAZING.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top