tigers best bet
The Tigers dominated the hapless Royals in 2006 (14-4, +$430 in head to head play), and they?ve taken 4 of the first 6 this year. KC is still winless against lefthanders (0-6, -$600 with 4.0 runs per game) and the Tigers continue to rack up profits in the role of visitor (+$335 so far in ?07, +$1700 in 2006). The Royals won?t have to deal with Nate Robertson, but Mike Maroth is on deck, looking to fatten his +$455 profit margin at KC?s expense. BEST BET: Maroth.
The Tigers dominated the hapless Royals in 2006 (14-4, +$430 in head to head play), and they?ve taken 4 of the first 6 this year. KC is still winless against lefthanders (0-6, -$600 with 4.0 runs per game) and the Tigers continue to rack up profits in the role of visitor (+$335 so far in ?07, +$1700 in 2006). The Royals won?t have to deal with Nate Robertson, but Mike Maroth is on deck, looking to fatten his +$455 profit margin at KC?s expense. BEST BET: Maroth.

