SD Padres

S

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
They end up over 500.

Missing their best player.

Just two games in, they end up at least 20 games better then the Marlins, would not be shocked they end up around 85 wins.
 
STOP & POP

STOP & POP

Bad Putter
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2003
435
0
16
San Antonio, TX
shawn555 said:
They end up over 500.

Missing their best player.

Just two games in, they end up at least 20 games better then the Marlins, would not be shocked they end up around 85 wins.
Click to expand...

Book doesn't think so.

PADRES RSW MLB - REG SEASON WINS . . Over / Under 74.5 -120
:shrug:
 
S

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
STOP & POP said:
Book doesn't think so.

PADRES RSW MLB - REG SEASON WINS . . Over / Under 74.5 -120
:shrug:
Click to expand...

Yeah I played them over a few weeks back, not really concerned about an 0-2 start.

Look at how they finished last season. From July on they went 47-36. For second half were 42-33

Right now they are missing Chase Headley who is out with broken thumb, Yasmani Grandal who is out 50 games via suspension.

Jedd Gyorko is going to hit and when Headley comes back can slide over to second base.

Pitching may be a little thin but think this is a better team then everyone is saying. Harvey was dealing for the Mets tonight, and once he got out the padres scored four in the last two innings.

This team is going to have some real nice value this season.

They are a dog tomorrow in the +130 +135 range and I will be taking a shot with them to avoid the sweep.
 
S

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
This is from the Joe Sheehan newsletter which is well worth purchasing.

His power rankings have the Padres 7th overall

7. San Diego Padres (89-73, first in NL West, 711 RS, 650 RA). I've written a lot of words about the Padres, so I'll just sum up the tent poles of this apparently absurd prediction. One, some team surprises us every single year, and they're the best candidate. Two, the age of their lineup leads me to believe their offense could improve sharply. Three, they should get better with internal replacements during the season. Four, the NL West is a division without a great team, one that could be won with fewer than 90 wins. I might be wrong about one or all of these, but I'll stand by the thought process, and the thought process is what matters.
Click to expand...
 
STOP & POP

STOP & POP

Bad Putter
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2003
435
0
16
San Antonio, TX
shawn555 said:
Yeah I played them over a few weeks back, not really concerned about an 0-2 start.

Look at how they finished last season. From July on they went 47-36. For second half were 42-33

Right now they are missing Chase Headley who is out with broken thumb, Yasmani Grandal who is out 50 games via suspension.

Jedd Gyorko is going to hit and when Headley comes back can slide over to second base.

Pitching may be a little thin but think this is a better team then everyone is saying. Harvey was dealing for the Mets tonight, and once he got out the padres scored four in the last two innings.

This team is going to have some real nice value this season.

They are a dog tomorrow in the +130 +135 range and I will be taking a shot with them to avoid the sweep.
Click to expand...

Headley will definetly help them when he comes back, I remember them playing their asses off at the end of the season last year but that was last year.

Thx for the insight but I honestly see them coming in last in that division.

I played under the total of 74 - last week.

Nothing would make me happier than them being ahead of SF at years end,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Bet on MyBookie
Top