Secret senator blocks bill, creating classic 'whodunit'

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
This is really something to me...I have a few questions, but the first one would be: How does ANY legislation come up for a vote if all that needs to happen to keep it from being voted on is to have a nameless Senator put a hold on it?!? I don't think this one will die, and I would assume that the Senators that did NOT do this will be leaping to contact this Web site to get their mugshot moved to the not responsible area. There are some he said-she said comments in that area, too, but I wouldn't want to be one of the stragglers as this gets more publicity. The person who did it had to have a good reason for hiding, I would think, but how would they think they could pull it off? Very strange.

Secret senator blocks bill, creating classic 'whodunit'

Something may be afoot as legislation that would provide database to track federal spending may never be voted on

By Rebecca Carr
COX NEWS SERVICE

WASHINGTON - In an ironic twist, legislation that would open up the murky world of government contracting to public scrutiny has been derailed by a secret parliamentary maneuver.

An unidentified senator placed a "secret hold" on legislation introduced by Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., that would create a searchable database of government contracts, grants, insurance, loans and financial assistance, worth $2.5 trillion last year. The database would bring transparency to federal spending and be as simple to use as conducting a Google search.

The measure had been unanimously passed in a voice vote last month by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and had support from heavy hitters such as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. It was on the fast track for floor action before Congress recessed on Aug. 4 when someone put a hold on the measure.

Now the bill is in political limbo. Under senate rules, unless the senator who placed the hold decides to lift it, the bill will not be brought up for a vote.

"It really is outrageous to do this in the dead of night as Congress is recessing," said Gary Bass, executive director of OMB Watch, a budget watchdog group based in Washington. "The public has a right to know how the government spends money."

Democracy is based on holding the federal government accountable, Bass said. "For any senator to get in the way, (that) is a senator in the way of democracy," he said.

The secret hold has prompted conservative and liberal government watchdog groups to band together to "smoke out" the senator responsible.

Porkbusters.org, for example, has posted photographs of all senatorial suspects underneath a bold-faced headline asking, "Who is the Secret Holder?" The site also features photos of 13 senators who are "in the clear." All of them have told the site that they did not place a hold on the bill.

The hunt for the senator is turning into a classic political "whodunit," said Brian Darling, director of senate relations for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative leaning think tank based in Washington.

It could be anyone -- Democrat or Republican -- Darling said. To place a hold, senators merely have to inform their leader that they don't want the legislation to move forward, he said.

It remains unclear if the senator responsible will be able to withstand the pressure from the broad array of groups and senators supporting the bill.

Why would a senator be against a database that makes it easy to track what companies are awarded grants, procurement contracts, loans, insurance and financial assistance?

"Somebody has something to hide," said Ellen Miller, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, a new Washington-based nonprofit devoted to helping the public understand Congress through the Internet.

"It really is a mystery, not only who did it, but what the rationale could possibly be and why they would go to the mat on this," Miller said. "There is no conceivable, rational explanation for killing this legislation unless they have something to hide."

What is puzzling is the proposed database would give the public access to how the executive branch spends money, Miller said. It has nothing to do with holding the Senate more accountable.

Aides to Obama and Coburn say the senators are determined to get the bill passed.

"I don't think it's dead in the water," said Aaron Cooper, a spokesman for Coburn.

The best way to make that happen, Cooper said, is to inform the public about the bill and have them bring pressure on their members of congress to pass the bill.

"It's more than a little ironic that a bill designed to increase transparency is being held up by a secret hold," said Tommy Vietor, Obama's press secretary. "Transparency helps everyone."

The database proposed by Coburn and Obama would be far more comprehensive than what the government currently uses. The Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation run by the General Services Administration contains contract information. The Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects contains information about federally funded biomedical research projects. Other agencies have smaller databases.

The Coburn-Obama database would be searchable by agency, recipient and type of assistance. Most of all, it would be easy for the public to use.

Open government groups are determined to make federal spending more transparent with or without support from the government.

OMB Watch has spent four months and $100,000 to produce its own searchable database. The data will be made available to the public on Oct. 1.

"We are so frustrated that we are doing it ourselves," Bass said. "If a small nonprofit can obtain the information, certainly the government should be able to do this?"

The senators under suspicion for placing the hold: www.porkbusters.org
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
Looking at all those names in support of it, this seems to be as bipartisan as it gets. I think the article is dead-on that whoever did it has something to hide... it's clearly not a partisan thing and represents someone trying to save their own ass.

As far as being "in the clear," wouldn't it be pretty easy for the secret voter to just say, "Hey, it wasn't me." Or is there some way to verify?
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
There's no way something like this stays secret, but Chad makes a good point. How the f*ck can one anonymous senator block something from going to the floor? I've never heard of anything as ridiculous as this.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Why do I think it's one of those up for re-election.
Reason is item can be held for 90 days then put back for vote. So lets get re-elected then take the heat. Maybe?
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Looks like it was Ted Stevens - the brash king of pork from Alaska. Also could be Byrd, which wouldn't surprise me. I cannot see why some senators don't raise heck about what Stevens continually pulls off for his state...


Is a Dem Also Holding Up the Porkbusting Bill?

By Paul Kiel and Justin Rood - August 31, 2006, 11:32 AM

There's a loose thread to this "secret hold" story, and it bothers us.

By this morning, the dogged persistence of hundreds of bloggers and blogreaders garnered denials from 98 senators saying they did not hold up the Coburn/Obama spending transparency database bill. Only one senator, Ted "King of Pork" Stevens (R-AK), has admitted placing a hold on the bill.

But do the math -- you'll find that makes 99 senators. And Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) ain't one.

That's right: Byrd, whose penchant for pork would probably win him the Pork Crown if he weren't saddled with minority status, has for days declined to answer constituents and others who have asked if he put a hold on the spending database proposal, S. 2590.

We have called and emailed his office and press secretary at least a half-dozen times over two days. Yesterday, we were promised a statement by the end of the day; none came. This morning, spokesman Tom Gavin continued to blame Byrd's travel schedule for the lack of response.

What's more, staff in the personal and leadership offices of Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have been almost uniformly mum on the issue. If Byrd placed a hold on the legislation, he would have had to notify Reid's office to do so. After several calls and conversations with numerous staffers, Reid spokesman Jon Steinberg would say for the record only that "it's the policy of our office not to talk about holds."

However, Reid's office on Tuesday confirmed that the senator himself had not placed a hold on the bill.

The office of Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN), who would know of the existence of a Democratic hold but not necessarily the identity of the holder, declined to comment. Frist has encouraged all senators to publicly declare their actions with regard to the Obama/Coburn bill.

We aren't the only ones wondering about Byrd's status. Yesterday, unsubstantiated rumors came from Senate Republican staffers claiming that GOP leadership staff knew of a Democratic hold on the bill.

Some blogs, including RedState.com and Suitably Flip, have reported without proof statements from anonymous "reliable," "Capitol Hill" sources that Byrd has a hold on the bill.

So, does he? It's a mystery to us how every one of Byrd's 99 colleagues have gone on record regarding the hold, yet he himself won't sing.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Just saw that on grapevine on Fox.
Logically one--could not agree with you more --he needs the ax--but doubtful Alaska will vote him out as they are benefactors for most part.
However if nothing else he will prob have tough time getting much through in future after this fiasco.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top