sheikh muhammad admits to 9/11..plotting attempts on lives of carter and clinton

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,588
234
63
"the bunker"
""New transcripts released by the Pentagon show that the man considered to be the chief mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, has admitted he is responsible for the terrorist attacks from “a to z”.

Mohammed has also acknowledged being responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, as well as other attempted terrorist attacks around the world in the years since.

The confessions come from a transcript of a hearing held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Saturday in which the Al Qaeda terrorist also acknowledged a plot to assassinate Bill Clinton while the former president was visiting the Philippines in 1994. The transcripts also show Mohammed admitted to plotting the October 2002 terrorist attack in Bali, Indonesia.""


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258817,00.html

i know thats fox...eeeuuuuwwww!!!

here`s another link...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070314/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_terrorist_confession_3


and this was admittedly after hours of torture featuring air conditioning, subway sandwiches and koran's held with rubber gloves......

KhalidSheikhAP_535x700.jpg


if they`d used an epilady on this s.o.b. they could have gotten him to confess to the lindbergh kidnapping.....
 
Last edited:

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
""New transcripts released by the Pentagon show that the man considered to be the chief mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, has admitted he is responsible for the terrorist attacks from ?a to z"......

This is the man that is "considered" to be the chief mastermind. When you say considered, does that mean that he is or are we just guessing ? How much faith do you have in the Pentagon and it's intelligence agencies to connect the dots. How much do you believe ? It's all bullshit if you ask me. We're just crying about spilled milk and it's any ones guess who spilled it. Many people have admitted to things , they have not done.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,588
234
63
"the bunker"
i believe it....

but then,he must have been working for governor bush and the mossad....

right bryanz....

one thing i don`t get...if the guy gave up all this info,he could have at least bartered for a photo that DOESN`T make him look like like a haggard ron jeremy...

i mean,the guy came clean...cut `im some slack...
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
forget it GW --your talking to the crowd that don't feel any safer with these guys off the street in fact if they had their way they'd be wanting to prosecute our guys --if any of these "freedom fighters" rights were violated.

--and add to that they want to bring these guys stateside--for incarceration
:shrug:
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
forget it GW --your talking to the crowd that don't feel any safer with these guys off the street in fact if they had their way they'd be wanting to prosecute our guys --if any of these "freedom fighters" rights were violated.

--and add to that they want to bring these guys stateside--for incarceration
:shrug:

Nah i think most of us with and IQ higher than a peanut would have rather just steamrolled afghanstan and made a statement showing the world we are not meant to be f-ucked with instead we now are the laughingstock of the world because of nitwits like you and your retarded thinking. We are also the most hated country in the world after we had everyone behind us after 9/11. Also we have the biggest target on our backs right now because of this lame backwards ass thinking you and anyone who supports the clueless stuff you say, agree with. We now will have to worry about thousands more of these whackjob because of this greedy driven iraq occupation that has now turned into a no win situation. If this was such a great idea where is the help from the other nations. I know this is a little rough of a statement from me but you basically insulted everyone on this political site with this garbage bullshit you post and im sure not one of us agree with it.
 
Last edited:

danmurphy jr

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2004
2,966
5
0
Just in: He assassinated JFK-the Tooth fairy, the Roadrunner and Jaywalks and the they took the pliers off his nuts. How do I know? Because the Bible er, no the President er, no the Government told me so. Those honorable folks who wouldn't try to deceive even the most hapless moron er no
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,331
1,512
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
forget it GW --your talking to the crowd that don't feel any safer with these guys off the street in fact if they had their way they'd be wanting to prosecute our guys --if any of these "freedom fighters" rights were violated.

--and add to that they want to bring these guys stateside--for incarceration
:shrug:

I agree with a lot of what Sponge said. I would have been in favor of pissing all over Afghanistan without setting foot on their soil. The message would have been sent, it would have been clear, and minimal American soldiers would have had to risk their lives in the strike(s).

I also agree that we are safer with this ass off the street, but I would much prefer they torture him to get intelligence (if you can call it that) info that could thwart future plans. Torture him here, torture him there, but get something out of him that will protect the lives of our own in the future. He can confess to starting the Great Chicago Fire, but it doesn't do much good until it helps prevent future actions.

Not all liberals are worried about the rights of terrorists just like not all conservatives are psychopaths.

EDIT: duplicate words erased
 
Last edited:

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
forget it GW --your talking to the crowd that don't feel any safer with these guys off the street in fact if they had their way they'd be wanting to prosecute our guys --if any of these "freedom fighters" rights were violated.

--and add to that they want to bring these guys stateside--for incarceration
:shrug:
Yes, this is a completely unfair and unreasonable statement. 99.99% of us want full punishment on guys like this Sheikh asshole. Can't something like this just be news? This tactic that you have - of taking news and then associating the people you disagree with on other issues as siding or sympathizing with someone like this guy - well it's insulting and very tiresome. I'd like to think you are more sophisticated than this, but you keep doing it.

Interesting to note, this Sheikh Mohammed guy was born in Kuwait, lived in Pakistan, educated in the US. Nowhere in his resume is anything about Iraq. If his confessions are at all true, it only re-iterates that Iraq was a massive distraction from the actual War on Terror. Almost all of this worst offenders have spent the majority of their time in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Pakistan, and the US. ....From 9/11 on through to every planned terror attack, it's people from the waelthy Arab countries, supposed allies, and even right here in our country. Iraq was probably the one place we could count on as NOT escalating terror attacks. But we continue to coddle to places and governments that have inspired the most terrorism.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
I but I would much prefer they torture him to get intelligence (if you can call it that) info that could thwart future plans. Torture him here, torture him there, but get something out of him that will protect the lives of our own in the future. He can confess to starting the Great Chicago Fire, but it doesn't do much good until it helps prevent future actions.

Gmozz im not to sold on the torture idea. On paper it looks like the right thing to do but I just don't think so. If someone put my head in a vice i think i would tell them anything they want to hear especially made up shit. Im sure they are trained what to say. Who knows but like i said i would say anything to get out of that vice. Might even ask them if they could tighten it up a little if i knew they would let up.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,331
1,512
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
Gmozz im not to sold on the torture idea. On paper it looks like the right thing to do but I just don't think so. If someone put my head in a vice i think i would tell them anything they want to hear especially made up shit. Im sure they are trained what to say. Who knows but like i said i would say anything to get out of that vice. Might even ask them if they could tighten it up a little if i knew they would let up.

Sponge: I can appreciate where you are trying to come from, but I don't think you are connecting the dots. I'll put it this way: For his crimes, I'm pretty sure he is eligible for the death penalty. That end should be sought, but the opportunity to protect ourselves CANNOT be overlooked and should be pursued. Whatever info we get, true or false, is worth looking into. When I advocate torture, I do so in the hope of getting preventitive info. Not at all interested in who he's already killed, I want to know who he works with and what is in the works. The question of whether or not it is ethical is comical when you really break it down. Protecting the rights of an individual should not be more important than that of the rights of many....such as the right to life. If you knew that the torture of this particular criminal offered a 25% opportunity to protect the future/lives of 10 people, would you proceed? I would.
 

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
are they going to put this guy on trial for purgery or false official statements or something?

We all know that the feds are the ones that masterminded 9/11.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge: I can appreciate where you are trying to come from, but I don't think you are connecting the dots. I'll put it this way: For his crimes, I'm pretty sure he is eligible for the death penalty. That end should be sought, but the opportunity to protect ourselves CANNOT be overlooked and should be pursued. Whatever info we get, true or false, is worth looking into. When I advocate torture, I do so in the hope of getting preventitive info. Not at all interested in who he's already killed, I want to know who he works with and what is in the works. The question of whether or not it is ethical is comical when you really break it down. Protecting the rights of an individual should not be more important than that of the rights of many....such as the right to life. If you knew that the torture of this particular criminal offered a 25% opportunity to protect the future/lives of 10 people, would you proceed? I would.

its not an ethical issue with me. If it works so be it but im not to sure it works. I think Mccain said the same thing and out of any of us he should know. Maybe give him a few whores and let them soften him up. who the hell knows. I got it, send him to a hairdresser or bartender. You would be surprised what people will say to a bartender or a hairdresser. Especially the ones that are hot. Lots of guys think tthey can get them so they tell them anything. I can just see Weasal telling his hairdresser everything about himself and giving her a huge tip each cut and then thinking he is gonna get a piece of her down the road because she is being so nice to him.
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
"Yes, this is a completely unfair and unreasonable statement. 99.99% of us want full punishment on guys like this Sheikh asshole. Can't something like this just be news? "

Yes Smurph it could be just news --just like casulties of war--but you have one side pounding the drums every time we have a casualty--

You have front page news for 43 days on our people 'embarrassing and humiliating" captured terrorist--and Dems have prioriy issue of trying to regulate how we question them--

There have been numerous al queda heads taken off the street in war on terror--and many comment continuously how things were better in good ole days when we looked the other way.

That is why I think it is important to make issue of it. Whether we want to realize it or not--these terrorist been planning and commiting atrocities for decades--We can take it and look other way or do something about it--We better support who ever wins next election in continuing fight and not try to ties their hands and make things easier on/for the bad guys--because they sure don't/won't play by any rules.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
i got an idea dog how about we give them what they want? Its not hard. Two things. One get our bases off of their land and two get the hell out of their lives. Doesn't seem to tough to do but they have something we want it and its called oil. wouldn't it be nice if your neighbor just help himself to anything in your garage and never gave it back? That is basically what we do.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
"Yes, this is a completely unfair and unreasonable statement. 99.99% of us want full punishment on guys like this Sheikh asshole. Can't something like this just be news? "

Yes Smurph it could be just news --just like casulties of war--but you have one side pounding the drums every time we have a casualty--

You have front page news for 43 days on our people 'embarrassing and humiliating" captured terrorist--and Dems have prioriy issue of trying to regulate how we question them--

There have been numerous al queda heads taken off the street in war on terror--and many comment continuously how things were better in good ole days when we looked the other way.

That is why I think it is important to make issue of it. Whether we want to realize it or not--these terrorist been planning and commiting atrocities for decades--We can take it and look other way or do something about it--We better support who ever wins next election in continuing fight and not try to ties their hands and make things easier on/for the bad guys--because they sure don't/won't play by any rules.
I'll grant you that some people may bring up casualties too much. When they use that news to push poltics, it's wrong. Then again, sometimes it's a release of frustration...and other times, it's just news.

You really should drop the Abu Ghraib thing. I have no problem with that being news for as long as it was. We must check ourselves above all else. I believe that's the burden we accepted when we became the aggressors. We must keep ourselves to a higher standard when it comes to Iraq.

I will also grant you that we've made progress taking out Al Qaeda leaders ...THAT WE KNOW OF. We would be absurdly naive to think that there are not replacements lined up for whoever we kill or capture. ALL ESTIMATES say that our Iraq campaign has resulted in a massive increase in numbers to terror organizations. So, you have to figure that when we remove an individual from the ranks, their position is quickly filled. It's likely a zero sum gain - it's hard to get excited about it.

I agree with your last paragraph. I wonder - since you don't think we should make things easier on the bad guys - do you honestly think invading Iraq did not make things easier for them?
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
Absolutely not Smurph--my reasoning

Iraq is now central ground for A-Q not only do we have bulk in one location we now have Iraq's also joining in fight against them as well as many other countries in fact Saudi's have knocked out numerous big boy.

Now I hear from media that Iraq has been recruiting tool for A-Q--maybe to some extend but those I figure would have joined at some point anyway--but what the war has proven to moderate muslims beyong any doubt is just how radical A-Q is and not only is west a target but also fellow Muslims including women and children.
I believe they have lost any alliegence from moderates that they may have previously had.

A-Q 2nd in command evidently agreed when he sent letter (after bombing of wedding party) to head of A-Q in Iraq to cool it with the targeting of civilians.

So in my view I think war in Iraq has been big blow to A-Q
If you think about it there has been no open support for A-Q in Iraq other than a few Sunni hardliners--and if I was moderate muslim I'd have to ask myself why are radicals of my own faith killing my people to stop our country from being free.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,588
234
63
"the bunker"
dtb...did you know that clinton and carter are actually bushes?.......i didn`t.....this is so confusing.....lol

here`s some breaking news for moonbats:"even the appeasers aren`t safe!"....
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
dtb...did you know that clinton and carter are actually bushes?.......i didn`t.....this is so confusing.....lol

here`s some breaking news for moonbats:"even the appeasers aren`t safe!"....
Here is some news for you MAYBE THEY AREN'T AS SOFT AS YOU CLAIM!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top