Sheriff's deputies' disdain for Constitution captured by their own recorded comments

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Sheriff's deputies' disdain for Constitution captured by their own recorded comments

By DANIEL BLACKBURN

When San Luis Obispo County Sheriff?s Deputy Darren Murphy responded to a ?shots fired? call in April 2008, he decided en route that he was going to make an arrest.
He did far more than that. Murphy and other deputies made an unwarranted entry into a home, and then into a locked gun safe. Murphy's uncensored, darkly disturbing observations and behavior following his Code-3 arrival at the rural home of longtime SLO County resident Matt Hart were picked up by Murphy's and other deputies? own recorders. Those recordings provide a rare, frighteningly revealing, behind-the-scenes perspective of how one local law enforcement agency views the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and other laws its personnel are sworn to uphold.

Sheriff?s spinner Rob Bryn declined to confirm the identities of any of the deputies appearing or heard in the recordings, or to discuss any aspect of the Hart home invasion. So we've done that for you. (Bryn, ever the public servant, eventually stopped responding to e-mails from a KCCN.tv reporter.)

Deputies? deportment in the field as exhibited by their own words, as well as their plainly audible efforts to fabricate justifications for their actions, are lamentable. Local county prosecutors? subsequent abuse of power, wielded in a cavalier, clumsy, and transparent effort to avoid a lawsuit, also is troubling.

But in the larger scheme of things, it is the systematic dismantling of the Fourth Amendment by over-zealous cops and an enabling judiciary that should be a cause of concern for every American citizen. Incredibly, Hart's case may be less of an anomaly than it appears.

The question is: Should law enforcement officers like Deputy Darren Murphy be allowed to make day-to-day, life-changing decisions regarding the fate of law-abiding citizens?

Watch. Listen. And then you be the judge.


<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-wKRKGqYZjI&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-wKRKGqYZjI&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9PI4rkECqWg&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9PI4rkECqWg&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfFbX1CE4zA&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfFbX1CE4zA&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>


I know where some of you will go with this, so predictable and compliant.

a01.jpg
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
The fourth Amendment? Didn't Bush wipe his ass with that?

December 5, 2005 -

Capitol Hill Blue: ?I don?t give a goddamn,? Bush retorted. ?I?m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.?

?Mr. President,? one aide in the meeting said. ?There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.?

?Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,? Bush screamed back. ?It?s just a goddamned piece of paper!?


Bush denies this ever happened.

So why are they reading your email?
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
If the police will do this and enter a home, planning on manufacturing suspicion and trumping up charges later to justify their actions, then can't you see how legal minorities and other Americans could be concerned about the Arizona law? Just stopping people in public, due to the color of their skin - and you don't think any of this situations could be problematic?

Again, I don't necessarily agree with much of the criticisms of the law, and understand much of it, but I certainly think it opens up excessive action by police from time to time, if they have preconceptions and now fear being sued for non-action by "concerned" individuals.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
If the police will do this and enter a home, planning on manufacturing suspicion and trumping up charges later to justify their actions, then can't you see how legal minorities and other Americans could be concerned about the Arizona law? Just stopping people in public, due to the color of their skin - and you don't think any of this situations could be problematic?

Again, I don't necessarily agree with much of the criticisms of the law, and understand much of it, but I certainly think it opens up excessive action by police from time to time, if they have preconceptions and now fear being sued for non-action by "concerned" individuals.

Nice projection Chad by pulling up the AZ law.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top