sku
- Thread starter RAYMOND
- Start date
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lEV5AFFcZ-s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
you are exactly right RAYMOND
if you can get thru this you will understand alot more about how things work in this world
start at about 25 min in
scary shit of how things work
Victoria Jackson, former "Saturday Night Live" comedian turned ultra-conservative gadfly, delivered a rant on Thursday in which she targeted "Black History Month" and suggested that whites ought to create their own annual celebration.
"Now, that the white race is becoming a minority in America, perhaps we need to make ... say, January, White History month," she wrote on her website, according to the political blog Wonkette
......................................................................
White Power
"Now, that the white race is becoming a minority in America, perhaps we need to make ... say, January, White History month," she wrote on her website, according to the political blog Wonkette
......................................................................
White Power
Pakistan's tourism officials have announced plans to build a $30 million amusement park on the outskirts of the Himalayan foothills town that gained worldwide attention as the place where U.S. Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden.
The 50-acre site will include a zoo, restaurants, water sports, miniature golf as well as rock climbing and paragliding, officials said.
.................................................................
This is obviously a memorial to Bin Laden
Lets let them build this carnival and then send in the drones to level it.:0074
The 50-acre site will include a zoo, restaurants, water sports, miniature golf as well as rock climbing and paragliding, officials said.
.................................................................
This is obviously a memorial to Bin Laden
Lets let them build this carnival and then send in the drones to level it.:0074
February 4, 2013 (PHOENIX) -- It looks like Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has become a victim of credit-card fraud.
Sheriff officials said Monday that Arpaio's credit-card information was stolen and used to make a $291 transaction at a Chicago grocery store last weekend.
Arpaio says he hasn't been to Chicago in years and his credit-card company alerted him to possible fraudulent activity.
The Arizona Republic says it's still unclear whether Arpaio's credit card was stolen or if the transaction was made by another means.
He says his card has been canceled to prevent any further fraudulent use as authorities try to figure out what happened.
.....................................................................
Geeezz Joe got stolen ID
thats a story
Sheriff officials said Monday that Arpaio's credit-card information was stolen and used to make a $291 transaction at a Chicago grocery store last weekend.
Arpaio says he hasn't been to Chicago in years and his credit-card company alerted him to possible fraudulent activity.
The Arizona Republic says it's still unclear whether Arpaio's credit card was stolen or if the transaction was made by another means.
He says his card has been canceled to prevent any further fraudulent use as authorities try to figure out what happened.
.....................................................................
Geeezz Joe got stolen ID
thats a story
Long time contributor Dick Morris will no longer be a talking head on Fox News Channel. ?His contract is up and we will not be renewing it, ? a spokesperson for the news network confirmed today. A perpetual presence during last year?s Presidential election, Morris has not been seen on FNC since November 12.
During the battle between President Barack Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney, the former Clinton advisor had been strongly predicting a big loss for the incumbent. Morris didn?t waste much time moving on from FNC.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
'
really cant stand this little prick
:0074
FOX news ratings falling like a rock
Palin and Dicky outside now !
During the battle between President Barack Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney, the former Clinton advisor had been strongly predicting a big loss for the incumbent. Morris didn?t waste much time moving on from FNC.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
'
really cant stand this little prick
:0074
FOX news ratings falling like a rock
Palin and Dicky outside now !
Consider this: over the next decade nuclear weapons and related programs could cost $640 billion. This colossal price tag is impossible to justify. Since the end of the Cold War, nuclear weapons have played a far smaller role in ensuring American security -- yet the nuclear weapons budget remains stubbornly high. For a modern and cost-effective defense budget, we must reshape and right-size this area of defense spending.
Many are unaware of the hidden costs of simply keeping the nuclear arsenal operational: it costs money not only to maintain nuclear weapons, but also to refurbish them, keep them secure, operate the bases where they are housed and train the professionals who manage and protect them. By the estimate of the Washington-based Stimson Center, those operations and maintenance costs add up to approximately 31 billion dollars a year, and are slated to expand in coming years.
And the spending doesn't stop there. Rather than optimize our nuclear policy and posture for the 21st century, the government has actually pushed to expand nuclear programs -- and the costs are spiraling out of control. Here are just a few examples:
The plan to modernize the B61 gravity bomb will cost $10 billion. In total, each new B61 bomb will cost more than its weight in gold -- a steep price for a bomb whose primary purpose was to prevent the Soviet armor from rolling across Germany, a threat that has long since disappeared.
In a classic example of runaway spending, the projected cost of a brand-new nuclear facility at Los Alamos, New Mexico has ballooned from $375 million to at least $3.7 billion -- a tenfold increase. The Obama administration and both houses of Congress have agreed on a five-year delay to the project, a sign of bipartisan agreement that the building's considerable costs outweigh the potential benefits.
Another new facility, the Uranium Processing Facility in Tennessee, has also seen its estimated costs nearly double, going from $3.5 billion to $6.5 billion in just one year. This is all the more egregious given that the facility may not even be necessary: it has been reported that the existing infrastructure could simply be upgraded instead -- for less than 1/1,000th of the cost of the new laboratory.
Finally, the Navy has an ambitious plan to build twelve new ballistic missile submarines, which will cost nearly $350 billion over their lifetime. The Navy itself has admitted that this staggering cost will compromise its ability to build other ships. To reduce costs, the Navy could build a smaller fleet of eight submarines, which could, if necessary, house the same number of nuclear warheads as the proposed fleet of twelve. The programs to modernize the other two legs of the nuclear triad, bombers and long range missiles, should also be closely reviewed for cost and strategic necessity.
Nuclear weapons programs account for a significant portion of unnecessary defense spending and hence the deficit. The billions of dollars spent on the upkeep and upgrading of nuclear weapons could be used to pay down the deficit, or invest in higher-priority defense programs.
Those who argue that we need more nuclear weapons for national security are trapped in a Cold War mindset. The world has changed since the Soviet Union collapsed -- and our strategy must change, as well. As former STRATCOM Deputy Commander Lt. General Dirk Jameson put it, "Having more nuclear weapons doesn't mean we are winning... It merely reflects that our strategy is ill-suited to our times."
The strategic way to cut defense spending is not by cutting across the board, but by focusing on specific wasteful and unnecessary weapons systems. Nuclear weapons programs should be at the top of this list. With the Cold War far behind us, and an era of difficult budgetary choices ahead, we must ask whether we want to continue bearing the costs of an expensive nuclear arsenal that is a relic of a bygone era and doesn't help to keep us safe.
.....................................................................
Cut this shit out
decrease nukes dramatically
We can only kill the world twenty times over at this point.
Do we need to kill them 40 ?
Many are unaware of the hidden costs of simply keeping the nuclear arsenal operational: it costs money not only to maintain nuclear weapons, but also to refurbish them, keep them secure, operate the bases where they are housed and train the professionals who manage and protect them. By the estimate of the Washington-based Stimson Center, those operations and maintenance costs add up to approximately 31 billion dollars a year, and are slated to expand in coming years.
And the spending doesn't stop there. Rather than optimize our nuclear policy and posture for the 21st century, the government has actually pushed to expand nuclear programs -- and the costs are spiraling out of control. Here are just a few examples:
The plan to modernize the B61 gravity bomb will cost $10 billion. In total, each new B61 bomb will cost more than its weight in gold -- a steep price for a bomb whose primary purpose was to prevent the Soviet armor from rolling across Germany, a threat that has long since disappeared.
In a classic example of runaway spending, the projected cost of a brand-new nuclear facility at Los Alamos, New Mexico has ballooned from $375 million to at least $3.7 billion -- a tenfold increase. The Obama administration and both houses of Congress have agreed on a five-year delay to the project, a sign of bipartisan agreement that the building's considerable costs outweigh the potential benefits.
Another new facility, the Uranium Processing Facility in Tennessee, has also seen its estimated costs nearly double, going from $3.5 billion to $6.5 billion in just one year. This is all the more egregious given that the facility may not even be necessary: it has been reported that the existing infrastructure could simply be upgraded instead -- for less than 1/1,000th of the cost of the new laboratory.
Finally, the Navy has an ambitious plan to build twelve new ballistic missile submarines, which will cost nearly $350 billion over their lifetime. The Navy itself has admitted that this staggering cost will compromise its ability to build other ships. To reduce costs, the Navy could build a smaller fleet of eight submarines, which could, if necessary, house the same number of nuclear warheads as the proposed fleet of twelve. The programs to modernize the other two legs of the nuclear triad, bombers and long range missiles, should also be closely reviewed for cost and strategic necessity.
Nuclear weapons programs account for a significant portion of unnecessary defense spending and hence the deficit. The billions of dollars spent on the upkeep and upgrading of nuclear weapons could be used to pay down the deficit, or invest in higher-priority defense programs.
Those who argue that we need more nuclear weapons for national security are trapped in a Cold War mindset. The world has changed since the Soviet Union collapsed -- and our strategy must change, as well. As former STRATCOM Deputy Commander Lt. General Dirk Jameson put it, "Having more nuclear weapons doesn't mean we are winning... It merely reflects that our strategy is ill-suited to our times."
The strategic way to cut defense spending is not by cutting across the board, but by focusing on specific wasteful and unnecessary weapons systems. Nuclear weapons programs should be at the top of this list. With the Cold War far behind us, and an era of difficult budgetary choices ahead, we must ask whether we want to continue bearing the costs of an expensive nuclear arsenal that is a relic of a bygone era and doesn't help to keep us safe.
.....................................................................
Cut this shit out
decrease nukes dramatically
We can only kill the world twenty times over at this point.
Do we need to kill them 40 ?
Fox News' credibility has fallen 9 percent since three years ago, according to new Public Policy Polling (PPP) results released on Wednesday.
The annual poll asks participants to rate their trust in multiple networks including Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, Comedy Central, ABC News, CBS News and NBC News. According to PPP's press release:
Just like its actual ratings, Fox News has hit a record low in the four years that we've been doing this poll. 41% of voters trust it to 46% who do not. To put those numbers into some perspective the first time we did this poll, in 2010, 49% of voters trusted it to 37% who did not. :142smilie
Just like last year, researchers also found that Fox News is the least trusted network when compared to the other networks in the survey. Thirty-four percent said they trust Fox News the most, while 39 percent said they trust it the least.
PBS is the only outlet that respondents trust more than distrust, with 52 percent of voters saying they trust the network, and 29 percent saying they do not.
.....................................................................
couldnt happen to a bigger bunch of liars
:00hour
The annual poll asks participants to rate their trust in multiple networks including Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, Comedy Central, ABC News, CBS News and NBC News. According to PPP's press release:
Just like its actual ratings, Fox News has hit a record low in the four years that we've been doing this poll. 41% of voters trust it to 46% who do not. To put those numbers into some perspective the first time we did this poll, in 2010, 49% of voters trusted it to 37% who did not. :142smilie
Just like last year, researchers also found that Fox News is the least trusted network when compared to the other networks in the survey. Thirty-four percent said they trust Fox News the most, while 39 percent said they trust it the least.
PBS is the only outlet that respondents trust more than distrust, with 52 percent of voters saying they trust the network, and 29 percent saying they do not.
.....................................................................
couldnt happen to a bigger bunch of liars
:00hour
Scott, the Idiots that voted for Obama will be denying it in a couple of years.
Pity Really
Nuff Said
:0074
Pity Really
Nuff Said
:0074
.......................................................................
did yu deny it when you voted for Bush .....
Did they lie when they bombed Pearl Harbor....
Did they lie when we fought in Korea
Hell to the No !
Before I deny i Voted for Obama again, the rooster will crow five times
