Snopes credibility takes a hit
- Thread starter Cie
- Start date
Correct. Their credibility isn't in question, it's their use of sources without permission.
This will end up hurting their credibility in the end. Good news for FactCheck.org, but the real celebrations seem to be coming from those that hate fact checks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/business/media/snopes-plagiarism-David-Mikkelson.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/business/media/snopes-plagiarism-David-Mikkelson.html
It is strange because the people that are absolutely convinced MSM journalists are out to manipulate the news also can't stand those that double check the accuracy of that work. :dizzy:
This has to be the post of the year! You have used these boobs to support your far left positions and now they have been exposed as cheaters you really want to tell us their credibility is not to be questioned. I would take this a step further and say your credibility is what really needs to be questioned.
Read the article. They aren't manipulating information, they're using sources that they didn't have permission to use. That's not right, but it doesn't change the accuracy of their fact checking. You can claim otherwise all you like but the explanation of what they are in trouble for doing is covered in several articles.
Can I ask you a question? Why do you trust this article? It's from a source that is rated as having a Left Center Bias, approximately twice that of the New York Times and more equivalent to a Mother Jones. I'm having a hard time with your contradictory takes on the biased media. Here we have an example of a liberal media outlet "spilling the beans" on a fact check site's fuck up and you're not in here challenging the source. Why is that?
