the u.n.?...my point has always been that the u.n. is corrupt...impotent.....a waste of space....and a shill for impotent anti-western despots and dictatorships....
EVERYTHING about the u.n. is wrong.....right down to it`s location... why is the u.n. in n.y. anyway?...
wouldn't they much better serve we earthlings by being in the congo, sudan, or some place they are really needed...
how can they justify spending money living high on the hog in n.y.c.?
wouldn't their money go a lot further if they were based in the the congo - they could do so much more "good."....lol
i hope you aren`t suggesting that the u.s.a.....the world`s lynchpin of freedom and democracy ....base it`s world policy on votes from ghana,syria,cuba(on the human rights commission),venezuela(possibly soon to become a member of the security council)?...
from rwanda to darfur to iraq to lebanon to whatever....all screw ups fraught with corruption and immorality......
if the u.n. had been honest and acted in the world`s best interests,iraq would have seen a collective resolve and the war would not have happened...
rwanda wouldn`t have happened....darfur...and on and on...
if you doubt that the u.s.` goal is to stop all these rogue,unstable dictators and regimes from having weapons that enable them tip the balance of power in already unstable regions....if you think that a healthy world economy free of despots and potential threats to freedom and democracy isn`t our goal....
if you think it`s all about haliburton and "rove" and bushitler....
then,i don`t know what to say to you...
you,like many people in the west, brainwashed as they are by the likes of the bbc,network news and the progressive print media, do not realize that the actions that america and israel take, is in defense of the west and our way of life...
if hezbollah,hamas,saddam,iran,kim jung il and others of their ilk are not dealt with, then missiles from terrorist groups will come to the cities of the west as well as the terrorism that we now experience.....
it`s inevitable...
