so, who's buying hillary's book ?

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
i can't believe all the attention that this is getting. i saw that some people actually waited overnight on line for hillary to sign her book.

from what i have heard there are some discrepancies between her recollections of events, with that of books that of a few of the clinton's assisstant's wrote in their books.


is anybody at madjack's buying her book?
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
I like how adament she is about how "shocked, and disgusted yada yada yada" she was when she found out that Bill was lying to her.....

LMAO....what a XXXXing liar....

book is exactly that....a pack of lies.....great fiction
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
I may read the good parts standing in a book store but I am not going to buy Hillarys book and put money in her pocket.

No way she ever has a chance to be President. She is dreaming. Too much public resentment towards Billy Boy being back in the White house fooling around again. Alot of slippery slopes with them two.

KOD
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
I am surprised to see that Dr. Freeze read the book. Myself I won't buy be buying it.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Special Reports Personal Collection:
Norris Carden's (www.nuzman.com) e-mail collection of Drudge's Special Reports (5/31/1997 - 1/17/2001.)

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT EXCLUSIVE XXXXX MONDAY, AUGUST 02, 1999 18:09:22 ET XXXXX

THE NIGHT HILLARY CLINTON MET JUANITA BROADDRICK

As the party was set to begin to celebrate the inaugural "Hillary issue" of TALK Magazine, one person down in Arkansas was
not in the mood.

Juanita Broaddrick.

"How can she just pretend that I do not exist?"

These are Broaddrick's first on-the-record words since news came out that Hillary Clinton has come clean on her husband's
misdeeds.

In an exclusive interview with the DRUDGE REPORT, Juanita Broaddrick revealed the chilling details of her one encounter
with Hillary Rodham Clinton-- an encounter that occurred just weeks after Broaddrick claims that Bill Clinton raped her!

The first lady tells Tina Brown's TALK magazine in a wide-ranging interview that her husband's weaknesses and infidelities
are problems that come from abuse that he suffered during childhood.

"You know in Christian theology there are sins of weakness and sins of malice, and this was a sin of weakness," Mrs.
Clinton says of the Monica Lewinsky affair in TALK.

But does the first lady regard the Juanita Broaddrick rape allegation as a "sin of weakness"?

The DRUDGE REPORT has learned that Editor Tina Brown did not want the Broaddrick question explored in the Hillary Clinton
interview, hitting newsstands on Tuesday.

According to publishing sources, Brown was personally involved in the final edit of the interview.

"The feeling was," one insider told the DRUDGE REPORT, "that Broaddrick was not important or relevant to the current
discussion."

And as America's media elite gathered to celebrate TALK magazine on Monday night, under the State of Liberty in New York
City, Broaddrick painfully recalled: The night she met Hillary Clinton.

"It happened at a political rally, in Van Buren, Arkansas in the spring of 1978, at the home of local dentist," Broaddrick
begins.

"She came directly to me as soon as she hit the door. I had been there only a few minutes, I only wanted to make an
appearance and leave. She caught me and took my hand and said 'I am so happy to meet you. I want you to know that we
appreciate everything you do for Bill.'"

Broaddrick was stunned by Hillary's comments.

Only weeks had passed, Broaddrick claims, since she had been raped in a Little Rock hotel room by then attorney general
Bill Clinton.

"Here her husband had just done this to me, and she was coming up to thank me? It was scary...

"I started to turn away and she held onto my hand and reiterated her phrase -- looking less friendly and repeated her
statement----'Everything you do for Bill'. I said nothing. She wasn't letting me get away until she made her point. She
talked low, the smile faded on the second thank you. I just released her hand from mine and left the gathering."

"I was in state of shock... nausea went all over me...

"You know, I should not have gone to that political gathering, but I think I was in denial at the time. I actually became
physically ill. I went outside and told my first husband I had to go home."

Broaddrick says that while Hillary was quick to approach her, Bill Clinton stayed on the other side of the crowded room.

"He never spoke or came near me," Broaddrick recalls.

Broaddrick, who had been a 'Clinton for governor' campaigner, says that one of her friends had driven the Clintons to the
rally from the airport that day -- and the topic of conversation throughout the ride was Broaddrick!

"Hillary knew something---- I just don't know what exactly. For years, I thought she knew what had happened to me, but now
I just don't know."

This information is being reported in this space for the first time. But this is not the first time Broaddrick has revealed
this information to the media.

Broaddrick says that during her controversial January interview with NBC NEWS, two producers refused to continue when the
subject of the Hillary encounter was brought up.

"As soon as I told them what happened with Hillary, they stopped rolling the tape and said to not go down that road,"
Broaddrick says.

"They just said, 'NO, NO,NO. We can't say that.'"

[NBC was also able to corroborate that during that period, Bill Clinton held a separate apartment -- away from Hillary,
according to network sources. The Clintons living arrangements was not explored on-the-air by NBC.]

"I am not frightened of this woman---I am frightened of her power," Broaddrick now says of First Lady Hillary Rodham
Clinton.

"And the spin by the media... the way they protect her."
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
My guess is that Drudge has an agenda. But I am shocked to see that you Dr. Freeze called the book a pack of lies without reading it. Of course he is not alone in coming to that conclusion before reading the book. The same can be said of all of Murdochs lapdogs who commented on the book before reading it. Very strange.
Like I said I will not be reading the book so I will not comment on whether it is true or not. But I do find it interesting that every Right Wing Believer of the Truth According To Murdoch has said that book is a pack of lies but they didn't read it.
 

Turfgrass

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 26, 2002
1,153
5
0
Raleigh
Today it?s Hillary, Hillary, Hillary. Hillary this. Hillary that.

Yup, it?s the publication date for Hillary?s ?Living History? book. Baba Wawa interviewed The Hildabeast last night. There will not be one network or cable newscast today without a Hillary story. Today we find that The Smartest Woman in the World is also The Biggest News Story in the World.

There are just a few things you need to remember while listening to all the hype today:

First, Hillary Clinton is a liar ?a pathological liar. This means that Hillary will actually tell a lie when the truth would serve her better.

She says that she believed her ?husband? when the stories about Monica Lewinsky first came out. If so ?that would make her the only compos mentis adult in the entire United States who did. Come on, folks. Hitlary knows Bill better than most. To buy her story that she didn?t know the stories about Bill and Monica were true is to imagine Hillary to be a complete idiot. She?s not an idiot. Dangerous? Yes. Idiot? No.

Oh ? and let?s address this ?I have no intention of running for president in 2008? nonsense. Saying ?I have no intention? is not the same thing as saying ?I won?t.? There?s ample room for wiggle room there. It?s the best possible answer she could give. Believe me, she?s running.

Wait! There is one thing that could derail Hitlary?s plans. She could lose her Senate reelection race in 2006. She absolutely MUST run for reelection in order to keep here platform for the presidential run. To do that she?ll have t lie to the voters of New York ? give them that ?I promise to serve the full six-year term? nonsense. Her problem won?t be with the lie. She does that very well. Her problem will be getting the people of New York to believe her lie.

One more thing. Hillary didn?t write this book. If you go blow (pardon the expression) $28 on this book you will be paying for the work of about four ghost writers who?s names you have never heard. Hillary read the book and suggested changes ? but she didn?t write it. Expect her to lie about this too.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
0743222245.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

.................................

this kinda puts things in perspective.

The books price is down to $19.95


KOD
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
I dunno if I would quote Sean Hannitty when it comes to lies. It seems this lapdog has a problem with the truth.




Synopsis: Sean Hannity won?t stop misstating Love Story. Will he do and say anything to win?

Commentary by Alan Colmes, Sean Hannity, Nancy Skinner, Sheri Jacobus
Hannity & Colmes, Fox News Channel, 9/19/00


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It must have come as quite a surprise to viewers of Hannity & Colmes.. Co-host Sean Hannity was involved in a familiar chore?accusing Al Gore of embellishing. Hannity had cited Love Story at the start of the segment. But Alan Colmes put an actual quote on the screen! And then, by golly, he read it:

COLMES: Again, I want to show you what the truth is and put it in perspective. The New York Times, December 1997, quoted the author of Love Story, Erich Segal, who said: "When the author Erich Segal was asked about Gore's impression, he stated that the preppy hockey-playing male lead, Oliver Barrett IV, indeed was modeled after Gore and Gore's Harvard roommate, actor Tommy Lee Jones." So the author said yes, Al Gore was the role model.

In Melinda Henneberger's 12/14/97 story, Segal had explained, in detail, that Gore and Jones had been the models for the male lead in the weepy best-seller.

It must have come as news to H & C's viewers. Hannity frequently claims that Segal contradicted Gore's remark on this subject. Indeed, earlier in the Tuesday night program, Hannity said it again. He was accurately contradicted by a guest, Chicago talk host Nancy Skinner:

HANNITY: This is a big picture that we've got to look at. Al Gore once told the American people, told the crowd, Love Story was based on his life and Tipper's life. The author of Love Story says it's not true.

SKINNER: No, that's not true, Sean?

HANNITY: Absolutely, he's on record?let me finish, let me finish, and then you can respond. He says it's not true, and I have quotes of him and I can bring them up later in the program.

We never did see those quotes. But Skinner soon returned to Love Story. She corrected Hannity's statement:

SKINNER: Back to the Love Story thing you started with?

HANNITY: Did he create the Internet, Nancy?

SKINNER: No, we're starting with Love Story, that was your first mention. OK. Erich Segal said that indeed Al was the model for the male model?

HANNITY: That's not true?

SKINNER: But that he never said Tipper was, and that all Al Gore had ever said?

HANNITY: Not true?

But as Colmes' quote would later show, Skinner's statement was perfectly accurate. Segal plainly told the New York Times that Gore and Jones were the two models.

Hannity's misstatements are wonderfully ironic, because he himself routinely commits the crime which he lays off on Gore. He routinely misstates the facts of this trivial incident?and in the process he calls Gore a liar. He also embellishes facts. On Tuesday, for example, he said that Gore "told the crowd" that the book was based on his life and that of his wife. But in fact, Gore's one fleeting comment on this subject was made in a late-night conversation with two reporters?Karen Tumulty of Time magazine, and Rick Berke of the New York Times. There was no "crowd" present?Hannity was improving the story. So, more lavishly, was Fox contributor Sheri Jacobus, responding to the Colmes comment quoted above:

JACOBUS: And Al Gore eagerly went out there and tried to let everybody know he was more than a role model, that this was in many ways based on him.

He did? Most charitably put, Jacobus is embellishing. Gore made one brief remark on this topic, and one only. (Tumulty has stressed to me how fleeting it was. "Two or three sentences tops," she has said, "in a two-and-a-half hour conversation.") Gore never "eagerly went out and tried to let everybody know" anything about this pointless matter. Jacobus' claims are simply made up. Over at the Fox News Channel, it looks like embellishment is going around.

Why does Fox permit this nonsense? It's long past time that we try to find out. On Hannity & Colmes, Gore is routinely assailed as a liar on the basis of statements?like Hannity's this night?that simply don't square with the facts. Indeed, the basic facts of the Love Story episode have been misstated in the media again and again. Tuesday night, Skinner stated them fairly clearly. When she did, Hannity changed the subject:

SKINNER: [A]ll that Al Gore had ever said?

HANNITY: Not true?

SKINNER: ?is that he had read in the Tennessean, a newspaper, that, where Erich Segal had said that he and Tipper were the model. You know what? The Tennessean newspaper did write that. Erich Segal has confirmed that it was Al Gore, but not necessarily Tipper. So there was a minor difference that got blown into?

HANNITY: I don't have a lot of time to refute every fact here. But did he create the Internet?

Fox should be ashamed to see evasive work like that done on its channel.

What are the facts about this endlessly-flogged groaner? The facts are clear from the 12/14/97 New York Times piece, the one which Colmes quoted. There had been an article in the Tennessean quoting Segal (inaccurately, as it turns out). In the article, Segal was quoted saying that Love Story was based on both the Gores. It was to that article that Gore alluded in his remark to Berke and Tumulty. What did Gore actually say to the scribes? In the 12/14/97 New York Times piece, Henneberger quoted Tumulty:

HENNEBERGER: "[Gore] said Segal had told some reporters in Tennessee that it was based on him and Tipper," Ms. Tumulty said. "He said all I know is that's what he told reporters in Tennessee."

Again, Tumulty has stressed to me, several times, that Gore's remark was fleeting and lacking in import. Between them, Berke and Tumulty wrote one sentence, total, about Gore's "attempt to let everybody know he was more than a role model."

Hannity's conduct is remarkable. He routinely tells viewers that Gore "has a problem with the truth," based on patently false recitations like this one. Indeed, even Colmes' presentation of the New York Times quote didn't stop Hannity from his bogus presentations. The next night (Wednesday), he again told viewers that Erich Segal had contradicted Gore on this matter. Evidence doesn't seem to count much at Fox. Tell us again, so we can get it straight: Do they "report" or "distort" when we decide?

It's amazing to think that such utter trivia has driven a White House campaign. But, without question, it plainly has?this silly incident has been cited, again and again, as a referendum on Gore's lack of character. Why has the press corps put up with this nonsense? It's a stain on the press corps' sad reputation?and given the importance laid off on this incident, it's an assault on our misused democracy.

Note: On Thursday and Friday of last week, we asked Hannity, by e-mail, to explain his comments. We asked him if he stands by his statements to Skinner. We asked him to explain why he said that Gore had "told the crowd." We asked him to provide the quotes which he had promised to Skinner. We enjoyed several conversations with an able assistant, but Hannity never responded.

At THE HOWLER, we're frankly concerned. We're worried that Hannity may have a "character problem." We suspect he will do or say anything to win. In fact, we're not sure that he knows who he is. So Roger Ailes, sir, please tell us true: Why do you put up with this nonsense?
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
last i checked Ruport Murdoch had nothing to do with any of the Clintonista scandals....nor did he have anything to do with the major media outlets covering up the Hillary and Bill scandals....nor did he have anything to do with "orchestrated" interviews which are a slap in the face of journalistic integrity
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
i don't like sean hannity. he is too partisan for my tastes.
but, stevie, you seem to blame murdoch for everything. he doesn't control the media.

i heard a few news people on other stations question hillary's account of events also, because hillary's account of events differ from what other people in the know have stated. the time line of newspaper articles also differ with what hillary has stated. so her credibility is being questioned.
 

Turfgrass

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 26, 2002
1,153
5
0
Raleigh
StevieD, you ruin every good conversation thread with your "Murdochs lapdogs? take every time.

If you would please give that one a rest. Or maybe just give your take on the book, and what you might think of Hillary?s chances for president for 2008 (I know you'll be voting for her).

Not everybody gets their news from just one or two sources.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I rather here what she has to say then most idots we have in congress. They all seem to speak same way. However a Gals outlook might be a little more refreshing then the old boys network. I just hope no one picks on there dog.
Clintons 3 Rebuplicans 0.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top