KBS I assumed you were a cdn. investor just from the list and assumed cgi stood for Cdn. general investments a closed end fund on Toronto.
as for the rest of the list
TRI Thompson Reuters
remember hearing a story about how frugal or cheap the Thompsons were, they would in the early paper days use the pencil until the very end.
one time in the mid 80s K. Thompson then one of the richest men in Canada stopped a (writer) he knew trying to find an item he had a coupon for, at a grocery store. later believe he let someone else shop for him, maybe when he became a billionaire.
anyways Thompson corp. is often recommended and overall would just fall, and dissappoint. in a way they re did their business from newspapers, to electronic inforamation and services, for financial, medical, law, ect.
the merger with Reuters should work, they should be able to cut costs, and have already delist the London shares which just made a mess of the share structure.
now listed in New York and Toronto. yields 3.52%.
should make 1.50-2.00 per share this year, and next year anywhere from 1.50 - 2.50.
the last quarter for a change was good, compare to many earnings reports in the past that would slightly dissapoint.
do not really follow it, but may start.... probably a wait and see.....
4. SU Suncor 1.16%
should say also own this in a drip/spp, bought it back in 1998....early 1999.
the one share bought for 42-45, now have 4 shares now just below 35 cdn.
let us be honest, this is a play on oil, the number of large investors in New York and Toronto think Suncor=oil, cdn. oil sands. just like they saw on 60 minutes.
they have know idea about Alberta or anything, so oil goes up Suncor goes up...oil goes down..well.
positives: long life reserves, I mean 40-50 years, but probably more, so running out of reserves not a problem in our lifetimes.
-great leverage to oil prices, this is positive or negative, just depends how it moves.
merger should work, should work, should work.
PCA provides cash flow, and projects on tap, however reserves of around 15 years.
Suncor should be able to use this cash flow and develop their longer life reserves cdn. oil sands.
should note looks like a good merger, still their is a surprising number of mergers that look good at frist then blow up.
negative: Suncor use to produce oil for 18 with thoughts of that falling, those days are gone forever. production costs seem to be climbing through the years.
prefer CNQ, though have SU in a drip/spp, when accumlate a position then transfer to my trading accounts.
SU should be in a trading range.
CGI Cdn. General investments
normally when you can buy a stock for $13 and has a nav of $16+ then it is a good deal, however remember in the mid 90s it would trade near a 30% dscount buy and then sell when it would be close to a 20% dscount.
at one time the stock was thought to be taken over and go from closed end, to an open one, the fund would have traded at the NAV. however believe people who run this fund are happy with the status quo, for years, or decades.
it use to beat the index, and perform well, in fact just a couple year ago would be much higher on the fund. it got walloped in the correction going from 30 to less than 10, to me that is a sign of not selling at stops, or falling a sleep at the wheel.
so now I own a big 45 shares, that is enough for now, may add to the position but can stay a very small investment in the drip/spp portfolio. also a thin trader, low number of trades.
if perfoamance improves then would add, will see how they do in the future.
thanks
selkirk