Thought title was appropriate--
After almost 8 years of listening to (opinion) of how incompetent and greedy GW was/is and how intelligent Bill and Kerry are--I think its quite remarkable that this dummy managed to accumulate quite a bit before politics.
Where on flip side Bill never made squat before political windfalls--tax returns from 1992 forward
http://www.taxhistory.org/presidential/
and Kerry took the marriage route--and in the true nature of the Haskell syndrome--rants about two America's and the little guy--but actions shows he could care less about misfortunate---
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry's largest single source of income in 2003 came from the sale of his half-interest in a painting by a 17th-century Dutch artist, according to tax returns released Tuesday by the Kerry campaign. (To see Kerry's entire 2003 federal return, click here.)
Kerry's 2003 return shows that he received $175,000 as his part from the sale of a work by the 17th-century Dutch seascape painter Adam Willaerts.
Kerry's Senate salary for 2003 was $147,818.
The return says Kerry acquired his half of the painting for $500,000 in May 1996 and sold his portion in March 2003 for $675,000.
In 1996, the year he acquired his half of the $1,000,000 picture, Kerry reported a total income of $143,795.
The return does not say who owned the other half of the painting, which sold in 2003 for a total of $1,350,000, but it was presumably Kerry's multimillionaire heiress wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry. The two file separate tax returns, and the campaign did not release any information about Mrs. Kerry's income or taxes.
Kerry also reported $89,220 in royalties from his campaign autobiography, A Call to Service: My Vision for a Better America, published last October by Viking Press.
In all, taking into account losses from investments, Kerry reported a total 2003 income of $395,338. His total federal tax bill was $90,575. He had $27,277 of that withheld from his paychecks and paid the rest, $63,298, with his tax return.
Kerry reported giving $43,735, or about 11 percent of his total income, to charity. That significant level of giving stands in contrast to his record in the 1990s, in which the issue of the senator's charitable contributions was a source of controversy. In 1995, Kerry reportedly had a taxable income of $126,179, and made charitable contributions of $0. In 1994, he gave $2,039 to charity. In 1993, the figure was $175. In 1992, it was $820, and in 1991, it was $0.
Kerry's 2003 return illustrates the extent to which Kerry's lifestyle is subsidized by his wife. Apart from the income from the painting, Kerry's Senate salary would not be enough to pay the property taxes on the several residences they own.
In addition to his 2003 returns, Kerry also released federal tax returns from the years 1999 to 2002 yesterday. There has been some dispute about returns for those years. Kerry has claimed that he had already released the returns ? in January of this year, he said, " I released all my tax returns for 20 years. I have never not released my tax returns throughout my political career." But aside from releasing details from his 2002 taxes ? which showed a total income of $144,091 ? it is not clear that Kerry has ever made public his returns from 1999 or 2000 or 2001 before now.
After almost 8 years of listening to (opinion) of how incompetent and greedy GW was/is and how intelligent Bill and Kerry are--I think its quite remarkable that this dummy managed to accumulate quite a bit before politics.
Where on flip side Bill never made squat before political windfalls--tax returns from 1992 forward
http://www.taxhistory.org/presidential/
and Kerry took the marriage route--and in the true nature of the Haskell syndrome--rants about two America's and the little guy--but actions shows he could care less about misfortunate---
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry's largest single source of income in 2003 came from the sale of his half-interest in a painting by a 17th-century Dutch artist, according to tax returns released Tuesday by the Kerry campaign. (To see Kerry's entire 2003 federal return, click here.)
Kerry's 2003 return shows that he received $175,000 as his part from the sale of a work by the 17th-century Dutch seascape painter Adam Willaerts.
Kerry's Senate salary for 2003 was $147,818.
The return says Kerry acquired his half of the painting for $500,000 in May 1996 and sold his portion in March 2003 for $675,000.
In 1996, the year he acquired his half of the $1,000,000 picture, Kerry reported a total income of $143,795.
The return does not say who owned the other half of the painting, which sold in 2003 for a total of $1,350,000, but it was presumably Kerry's multimillionaire heiress wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry. The two file separate tax returns, and the campaign did not release any information about Mrs. Kerry's income or taxes.
Kerry also reported $89,220 in royalties from his campaign autobiography, A Call to Service: My Vision for a Better America, published last October by Viking Press.
In all, taking into account losses from investments, Kerry reported a total 2003 income of $395,338. His total federal tax bill was $90,575. He had $27,277 of that withheld from his paychecks and paid the rest, $63,298, with his tax return.
Kerry reported giving $43,735, or about 11 percent of his total income, to charity. That significant level of giving stands in contrast to his record in the 1990s, in which the issue of the senator's charitable contributions was a source of controversy. In 1995, Kerry reportedly had a taxable income of $126,179, and made charitable contributions of $0. In 1994, he gave $2,039 to charity. In 1993, the figure was $175. In 1992, it was $820, and in 1991, it was $0.
Kerry's 2003 return illustrates the extent to which Kerry's lifestyle is subsidized by his wife. Apart from the income from the painting, Kerry's Senate salary would not be enough to pay the property taxes on the several residences they own.
In addition to his 2003 returns, Kerry also released federal tax returns from the years 1999 to 2002 yesterday. There has been some dispute about returns for those years. Kerry has claimed that he had already released the returns ? in January of this year, he said, " I released all my tax returns for 20 years. I have never not released my tax returns throughout my political career." But aside from releasing details from his 2002 taxes ? which showed a total income of $144,091 ? it is not clear that Kerry has ever made public his returns from 1999 or 2000 or 2001 before now.
