SYRACUSE JUST DOESN'T HAVE IT
- Thread starter bryanz
- Start date
thank you thank you thank you..
your the first person that has said what i have been saying all year. theres another team overrated like them and its the demon deacons from wake forest.
good luck bryanz
your the first person that has said what i have been saying all year. theres another team overrated like them and its the demon deacons from wake forest.
good luck bryanz
add Kansas to the list, I think Wake is better than Kansas. Hell I thiink most of the teams in the top 15 are better than Kansas.
I think WK was overrated at the start of the season at # 1, but their record is what is is and they are in the mix. Syracuse is not overrated, they just play in the best conference. It would not be a surprise if syr comes out and blows this team off the floor but they have not played that way of late. Syracuse has a Huge class edge tonight, so if they win big it doesn't say much about who they are right now. I don't known who will show up tonight. I think the ACC as a whole is made way to much of & the Big East will win a 3rd.
Last edited:
At the top I say syr doesn't have it, at the bottom I say they could blow them out, their is some good stuff if you read it.
The ACC is the most overrated conference in basketball. I think UNC is by far the most talented team in the country and should have 6-7 players playing in the leauge one day.
But, Duke, G-Tech and Wake are so inflated by ESPN and Dickie V.....It's embarrassing that Wake could get a one seed and this team has allowed other schools to post 100-plus points, not once, but twice..
Whoever wins the Big East should get a No. 1 seed....especially if they get seven teams...
But, Duke, G-Tech and Wake are so inflated by ESPN and Dickie V.....It's embarrassing that Wake could get a one seed and this team has allowed other schools to post 100-plus points, not once, but twice..
Whoever wins the Big East should get a No. 1 seed....especially if they get seven teams...
the acc is way better than the big east hands down. no argument there.
i made 2 bets about a month ago.
one- an acc team will make it further in the tourney than a big east team
two- neither syracuse nor wake will be in the final four.
i made 2 bets about a month ago.
one- an acc team will make it further in the tourney than a big east team
two- neither syracuse nor wake will be in the final four.
Back to Back Champs in UConn and Syracuse says a lot, wouldnt' you agree?
ACC has much more talent, but kids from the Big East are groomed to be tougher and more intense than the kids from ESPN's favorite conference.
Virginia Tech and Miami were supposed to struggle in the ACC this year, yet both schools are in the top half of this so called "Elite" conference.
Imagine if BC made the jump as well.
ACC has much more talent, but kids from the Big East are groomed to be tougher and more intense than the kids from ESPN's favorite conference.
Virginia Tech and Miami were supposed to struggle in the ACC this year, yet both schools are in the top half of this so called "Elite" conference.
Imagine if BC made the jump as well.
I definitely agree that the ACC THIS year is getting the benefit from a decade+ of great years in the 90's to early 00's. ESPN/Dickie V is on Duke and the rest of the ACC's nuts every game that is on TV and for what reason?
There are teams like Maryland that beat Duke twice this year, and then the bottom feeders like Clemson losing all of us that had a Maryland a lot of money. What does that say about Duke then? You don't see the bottom of the barrell like St. John's or Seton Hall beating Pitt, UConn, Syracuse, or BC...it just isn't happening. Maybe there is that much parity in the ACC, but I totally agree that the brutality of the Big East schedule grooms these teams for the grind of the tournament.
The ACC is defnitely in the top 2 conference this year by far (followed eithe by the Big XII or SEC I would say), but it is ludicrous to think that at least one Big East team won't get a #1 seed.
My view is that BC should get a #1 seed, especially if they win out, and then make it to at least the semifinals of the Big East tourny. I think we will see two Big East teams in the Final Four again (any of the likes of Syracuse or BC, but wouldn't be surprised to see Pitt, UConn, or even Villanova to make a run at it), and one ACC team (North Carolina...Duke will choke, and Wake might make it to the Regional Finals).
There are teams like Maryland that beat Duke twice this year, and then the bottom feeders like Clemson losing all of us that had a Maryland a lot of money. What does that say about Duke then? You don't see the bottom of the barrell like St. John's or Seton Hall beating Pitt, UConn, Syracuse, or BC...it just isn't happening. Maybe there is that much parity in the ACC, but I totally agree that the brutality of the Big East schedule grooms these teams for the grind of the tournament.
The ACC is defnitely in the top 2 conference this year by far (followed eithe by the Big XII or SEC I would say), but it is ludicrous to think that at least one Big East team won't get a #1 seed.
My view is that BC should get a #1 seed, especially if they win out, and then make it to at least the semifinals of the Big East tourny. I think we will see two Big East teams in the Final Four again (any of the likes of Syracuse or BC, but wouldn't be surprised to see Pitt, UConn, or even Villanova to make a run at it), and one ACC team (North Carolina...Duke will choke, and Wake might make it to the Regional Finals).
