system numbers Friday

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,096
140
63
Toronto
d'backs 60 (Schilling@Cruz)
--Schilling has been quite hot since coming off the DL - has had mixed success vs Cubs, a little on the plus side; Cruz is a hard-chucker (get lotsa K's ... and BB's) and was pretty good for 6 innings in his 1st start of the year July 26th @Astros (got the loss in a 3-1 game); offenses ranked pretty even here, but D'Backs have really been stinking it up on the road lately, and Cubs output yesterday may be a sign of things to come - tough to do the same here, though, vs Schilling; edge to D'Backs pen and defense; line looks right at -150
--total unknown, but I'll try it small at under 8.5 -110 if possible; probably pass on an 8; will love a 9, regardless of weather, as Schilling generally keeps the ball in the park, and D'Backs have not been slugging well on the road (Cruz about an HR allowed/game for his career)

Phillies 66 (Jarvis@Millwood)
--Jarvis has been (surprisingly) great lately, including a solid 8 IP @Giants last time out (got the W in a 2-1 game), and he threw only 89 pitches (will be working on 5 days rest); Jarvis has also had great success vs Philly in his career (4-0, 2.44 era in 7 games, 6 starts); Millwood has been brutal in his past 2, not making it out of the 4th inning both times (vs Mets then @Marlins) - he has been solid vs Padres in his career (4-1, 2.98 in 9 starts); Pads have been hitting well lately, and who knows what's up with Millwood (AND Jarvis, for that matter); price looks about right for this one, though there's no way I'd lay that kinda juice in this matchup right now, despite Philly's current surge
--I get 53% on the under 7.5, passing on the -105

rockies 53 (Stark@Torres)
--Stark roughed up by Milwaukee last time out, but has been pretty solid (in short outtings) since being called up at the start of July; Torres has been solid lately, including a fine 7-inning performance @Cards last time out (no decision in a 4-3 Cards win -- Cards scoring 3 in the bottom of the 9th off the BP) - he is 0-2 w/6.75 era vs Rocks in his career, 4 G, 2 starts); clear offensive edge to the Rockies here, but Pirates have been hitting very well on their current homestand; neither BP impressive, but Rocks' pen has been much better lately (not difficult); price looks even
--total looks even at 9
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,096
140
63
Toronto
Expos 59 (Franklin@Ohka)
--% would be higher for Expos, but Ohka has been awful lately, raising his opponents BA to .306 after being throttled at home by the Braves most recently - has made 1 start vs Brewers in his career, blanking them @Olympic for 6 innings last season; lefty Franklin has been poor in minimal work vs Expos; Expos with the offensive edge, particularly due to their solid work vs lefties at home; price looks even at -135
--I get 53% for the over 9, passing with the -120 (Expos did just have 2/3 low-scoring games with the high-powered Cards, @Olympic)

giants 62 (Williams@Wilson)
--hot rookie Williams makes first start vs Reds here; Wilson has been eating up some innings lately, but not very impressively - he's 1-2 w/7.47 era in 3 starts vs Giants; SF still prefering lefties, but should have the offensive edge here, especially with Reds just trading both Boone and Guillen (41 HR this year between the 2); price looks insane at SF -190, but not enough for me to try the other side ... no chance on that here
--total looks even at 9; under would maybe tempt, but Wilson has been unimpressive; interesting to note that Williams has only GIVEN UP 1 HR THIS SEASON, in 70.2 IP, and the HR still seems to be the Reds preffered method of scoring ... price is still a little too high for me on the Giants

cards 61 (Fassero@Trachsel)
--Fassero has been very good in his first 2 starting assignments this season, in short outtings - I project him for maybe 6 innings here - he's 7-7 w/3.65 era in career vs Mets (2-2, 3.08 @Shea); Trachsel has cooled off a fair bit over his past 4 starts, with his era ballooning from 4.10 to 4.71 over that span (club went 1-3); monster edge to the Cards bats here, especially with the Mets facing a lefty starter ... mind you, I'd be more comfortable with Edmonds making an appearance; looks like some value at Cards -120 (PV+6)
PLAYING:
Cards -120 -+- 1.8/1.5
--total looks even at 9, though I'd prefer the under if Edmonds is (likely) still sitting, especially with the Mets facing a revitalized lefty here

Braves 63 (Nomo@Maddux)
--seems unusual to be giving Nomo just a 37% chance here, but Nomo had a rough go (for him) vs Braves earlier this season (in LA), and is just 3-2 w/3.23 era vs in his career (again, nothing special for Nomo, 13 G, 12 starts) - Nomo is 0-2 w/4.98 era in 6 games (5 starts) @Turner Field; Maddux is 10-6 w/2.93 era in his career vs LA - he was having a great July until being roughed up @Expos last time out (3 of the 6 runs coming off the long-ball, w/Maddux having given up 20 in 148.1 IP so far, clearly heading towards his worst season as far as that stat goes - Dodgers and the long ball make strange bedfellows, however); edge here is mostly based on offensive edge; small value on Braves here at -150 (PV+3)
--under it too tempting for me to pass on here; #'s give me 62% for the under 8 (PV+7 at -120)
PLAYING:
under 8 -+- 2.4/2

Marlins 57 (Redding@Beckett)
--a couple of hot starters going here, with Redding coming off a beauty against the Cubs - mind you, Redding has been brutal in his last 3 road starts (all of June and July, for him) - Redding got the win in his only start vs Fla., tossing 5 innings vs at the start of May (in Houston - he DID allow 2 long-balls to Derek Lee, who is listed as day-to-day and has missed their past 2 games); since being skipped in the rotation due to injury, Beckett has come back with 2 beauties (vs Expos and Phillies) - he has been much better at home this year (2.08 era vs 4.50 on the road), which is a good thing as Marlins have been hitting a fair bit better on the road, and much better vs lefties overall - Beckett is 0-1 in 2 starts vs Astros, but has pitched great in his 12 IP, with a 1.5 era and 16 K's, no HR's); offensive edge to Astros here, but I'd be tempted to negate that if something is wrong with Berkman; Marlins are smoking at home right now, enjoyed a day off yesterday, while Astros come in having dropped a tough one to the Braves and their worse starter; Marlins are tempting, but price looks even at -130
--get a 60% for the under 8.5 here (PV+5 at -120)
PLAYING:
under 8.5 -+- 1.2/1
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,096
140
63
Toronto
chit...what is it about Kauffman this year? ... seems I made that comment before. Sure could use a Chisox extra-inning :rolleyes: win ... grrr:mad:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bosox@Orioles 50-50 (Burkett@Hentgen)
--Burkett has been pretty good lately, but is 3-7 w/5.16 era in his career vs O's (2-3, 3.96 @Camden); Hentgen appears to have worked things out, and has performed quite well over his past 3 starts - I saw his last go, vs the Jays, and he was very good - his interview after the game had him explaining some things that he was working on, and he sounded modestly confident regarding his continued success - he's had mixed success vs bosox, w/major concern being the 31 HR's allowed in 166.2 IP (8-10, 4.81 in 27 G, 24 starts); edge to the Sox bats is nullified by a small edge to O's pitching (for starters, pen now should favor the Sox, with their recent dealings); value looks to be there for O's at +135 (PV+7), maybe more so with the Sox now going into the 11th @Arlington
PLAYING:
O's +135 -+- 1/1.35
--got 57% for the over 10, minimal value at -120

indians@Rangers 50-50 (Traber@Thomson)
--Traber chucked a solid 5.2 against Rangers back in early May in 2 relief appearances, and may have some success here, as Rangers have had trouble vs lefties - still very inconsistent, 3 of his past 5 starts have been great, while the other 2 include a stinker @KC and a so-so vs Chisox (Chisox game was his follow-up to the complete-game 1 hit-shutout he chucked vs the Yankees); Thomson had his most successful month this season in July, w/4 of 5 starts being quite good (team went 3-2) - Thomson has made 2 starts vs Clev this season, going 0-2 w/8.71 era, and is 0-3 w/8.22 in his career vs (3 starts); definate offensive edge to Rangers, but considerably less than it would be vs a righty; edge to Indians pen here as well; some value at Indians +120 (PV+4), but I haven't budged on this one yet
--total looks even at 10.5, though I'd be tempted more by the under, if anything

Royals 66 (Kennedy@Lima)
--Kennedy is in the midst of a very poor year, as his 6.04 era and .317 OBA would attest - club has lost his past 6 starts; injury didn't seem to affect Lima in his last, though a short outting might be in order for him here (was thinking probably about 6, but he may be stretched to 7 with KC going extras Thursday) - this guy is HOT ... you explain, I dunno (a la Loaiza); KC with the offensive edge, too, as most teams get vs D'Rays (gee ... can't wait for their next series (yawn) vs Tigers), though D'Rays had little trouble hitting the Blue Jays excuse for a pitching staff (they scored 21 runs in the 3-game series); now 8-5 chisox going to bottom 11 ... looks like KC will enter this series having been swept by Chisox; -220 is an insult (PV-3 even at the 66%), but I can't back Kennedy here ... KC runline is also unappealing, mostly due to D'Rays potential to surprise with their bats
--got a 53% for the under 9, giving minimal value at +100

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
looks like A-Rod just crushed my Rangers under 3.5
hindsight does nothing for me here, play looked good in the top of the 9th, with Rangers leading 3-2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Twins 62 (Bonderman@Lohse)
--Bonderman has been better lately, and chucked a beauty in his last vs Royals - the rookie is 0-2 vs Twins this year, w/8.10 era; Lohse has really stunk over his past 8 starts, with maybe one exception (home to M's) - his era has gone from 2.91 to 5.18 over that span (yes, he has MAJORLY stunk) - he's 2-0 w/1.26 era vs Tigers this year (who isn't), but these starts were back in early April - his 1st and 3rd of the season; monster offensive edge to Twinkies, but inconsistency has ruled their season; this one looks ugly (if you're backing Minny); Twins at -190 gives PV-4 at 62% - something tells me that this # will come down, if anything, as people consider Bonderman's last performance, and Lohse's major downswing; Tigers runline at +money would possibly interest me, but no way at the -120 it sits at
--I get 55% for the under 8.5, giving me PV+5 at +100 ... still thinking about this one, maybe see what others at this forum think
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,096
140
63
Toronto
chisox 53 (Colon@Garcia)
--Colon has shaken off a couple of poor early July starts to post a couple of nice starts (mind you, they were at home vs Indians and D'Rays) - he's 1-1 w/5.40 era in 2 vs M's this year (the better of the 2 @SAFECO), and 4-6, 4.81 in 13 career starts (3-1, 2.93 in 4 solid starts @SAFECO) - HR's allowed is up this year for Colon (17 in 154 so far), but he's allowed only 3 over his past 7 starts (44.1 IP); Garcia had a brutal July, raising his era from 4.13 to 5.17 during the month - club has lost 5 of his last 6 starts (he's 0-4) - he's 3-6 w/4.70 era this season at pitcher-friendly SAFECO, allowing 11 HR's in 69 IP - he chucked a solid 6 innings @Comiskey on May 3rd, as M's won 12-2 (his only vs this year), and is 5-3 w/3.55 in 9 vs lifetime; edge to M's offense but not huge as they prefer lefties, prefer hitting on the road, and Chisox have been hitting great lately; totally looks like value to me at the +120 (PV+7)
PLAYING:
chisox +120 -+- 2/2.4
--total looks even at the 8.5; Garcia's coldness, Colon's inconsistency lately, Chisox hot bats, and the -120 juice repel me from the under consideration

jays 63 (Halladay@Ortiz)
--Halladay threw just 67 pitches in his 7 shutout innings vs the O's last time out, and will be working on a full 4 days rest, so hopefully he can go at least a full 8 - he tossed a solid 7.2 innings at the Angels back on May 11th (@Edison, got the W in a 4-2 Jays win), but is 2-2 w/7.98 era in 5 starts vs (1-1, 10.13 in 3 @Edison) - Fullmer, Glaus, and Salmon have all done damage in their careers vs Halladay, but all 3 should miss this one (Salmon the only possibility); Ortiz was having a great July until his last start vs A's, where he didn't make it through 3 innings - he is 0-2 w/12.00 era this season vs Jays, and is 3-6 lifetime w/5.32 era in 11 starts; Jays offensive edge should be even greater here with several key bats missing for the Champs; while I try to be careful backing the Jays (and for good reason, right now), value looks to be there at -125 (PV+7)
PLAYING:
jays -125 -+- 2.5/2
--I get 57% for the under 8.5 here, little value at -120

A's 54 (Mussina@Hudson)
--Mussina wasn't exactly dominating in July, and the yanks were just 2-3 over his 5 starts (era from 2.95 to 3.38 over that time) - this will be his 1st vs this year, and he's 14-9 w/4.17 era in 27 career starts (8-5 w/3.68 in 14 starts @Network); Hudson has been a monster lately, including a 105-pitch CG-effort @Angels last time out (Yanks won 10-1) - he had 1 bad start (of 6) in July, that being at Minnesota (Twins won 6-2, handing Hudson his 4th loss, to go along with his 9 wins - somehow ONLY 9) - he is 1-0 in 2 starts vs Yankees on season w/1.69 era and .151 opponent's BA, but is just 1-2 lifetime in 7 starts w/3.24 era - he's also 5-1 at home this year with a 2.34 era and just 4 HR allowed (Giambi hit one) in 96.1 IP (13 starts); decent edge to Yanks bats, especially with them on the road vs a righty - A's still look to have a good chance here; minimal value at A's -110
--I get a whopping 62% for the under 8 here, and this isn't factoring in the A's low production vs Westbrook and company, or the quiet bats of the Yanks in their late tilt vs Sele and company Thursday; PV+7 at the -120
PLAYING:
under 8 -120 -+- 2.4/2
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,096
140
63
Toronto
My action-thus-far revisited:
---------------------------------------
cardinals -120 -+- 1.8/1.5 (geez ... should I go more here?)
la@ATL under 8 -120 -+- 2.4/2
hou@FLA under 8.5 -+- 1.2/1

Orioles +135 -+- 1/1.35
chisox +120 -+- 2/2.4
jays -125 -+- 2.5/2 (hmmm ... should I (have) go(ne) less here?)
nyy@A's under 8 -120 -+- 2.4/2

...notice I prefer not to wait for hindsight before second-guessing

I need a vacation.
Wait a sec ... I AM a vacation.

Good fortune to you and yours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't surround yourself with yourself
Move on back two squares
Send an instant karma to me
Initial it with loving care
(Yes-The Yes Album-All Good People (a)Your Move)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top