system numbers Sunday

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,988
219
63
Toronto
Had to go out and have a busy, crappy day yesterday.
Got home and checked the scores and found out that I had had a really crappy day. Chase on Jays and double-pump-Rangers did not dispel the wound. One great day, one crappy day, so far in August. Onward to glory ...

--------------------------------------------------
Braves 80 (Mullen@Ortiz)
--Ortiz has been about even in his career vs Dodgers, but hasn't faced them this year, where he seems to be a different pitcher, and I've noticed him performing against other opponents that had hit him in past years; the % is if either lefty, Mullen OR Victor Alvarez get the start - both are large on the X-factor side, meaning I'm looking for a higher value+ than the PV+5 I've been trying with; system likes an X-factor under for the 8.5; I expect A. Jones back in the lineup, but Bragg filled in well for him yesterday (2-4 at the plate and solid defensively); PV+17 at the -169 I have available; PV+18 on a +115 runline at 65%; I shoulda just been on the runline for Phils and Barf ... I mean Wolf, yesterday - at least I woulda lost less:rolleyes:
PLAYING:
Braves -1.5 +115
2/2.3

Expos 58 (Sheets@Hernandez)
--couple of hot starters going here; Sheets (who usually tempts me when he starts) has had trouble with the Expos in the past, while the same can't be said about Livan vs Brewers; looks even at -135; system likes the under 8.5 better (60%), but the -125 just gives me PV+4, and I'm already all over the place Sunday

cards 64 (Stephenon@Griffiths)
--Stephenson has been a bit hot lately, in fairly short outtings, while Griffiths is likely unlikely to survive 5 innings here; neither pen very sharp, Mets the worse of the two; PV+1 at -165

giants 53 (Hermanson@Haynes)
--I don't have much faith in either starter here, and I'll pass on over 10 with Reds lineup recently losing lotsa power, and the Giants have some offensive problems lately, at least vs righties

Pirates 55 (Oliver@D'Amico)
--both starters have been good lately, but D'Amico is probably the more legitimate of the two; Rocks slugging vs righties is down, and WTF was up with them yesterday? (losing 1-0 ... no, thank Hendrix I was not on that one); Pirates PV+2 at -110; I'm calling for under 9 here, PV+6 at -110 and 59%
PLAYING:
under 9 -110
1.1/1

Marlins 66 (Fernandez@Redman)
--don't know too much about knuckleballer Fernandez - sounds like nothing special; hot Redman will be facing Astros for 1st time; Astros bats quiet lately, while Marlins finally starting to hit at home (at all-star break, Marlins were OPS was .735 at home and .797 on the road - mind you, their current 7-1 homestand, thus far, has been done mostly with solid pitching); PV+3 at -170, and I've got PV+5 at +115 and 52% for the runline; also like under 8.5 for PV+6 at +105 and 55%
PLAYING:
Marlins -1.5 +115
1/1.15
under 8.5 +105
1/1.05

Phillies 64 (Perez@Padilla)
--Perez has been good vs Philly before, as have most left-handers; Padilla nothing special in career vs Pads, but is smokin'; PV-1 at -180, and runline unattractive to me here; really like the under 8.5 here, PV+9 at -110 and 62%
PLAYING:
under 8.5 -110
2.2/2

Cubs 54 (Webb@Clement)
--should be a duel; sounds like it won't be too windy at Wrigley for the game, but I don't like it so much at 7 (Pinnacle only open # right now), despite my system giving 58% under 7 here (up to 63% if I could get an 8); might spank myself for a unit at under 7 +100 if it becomes available; Cubs PV-1 at -120

coffee-and-something-else-break

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sweet Jamaican pipe dreams
Golden Acapulco nights
Then Morocco, then the east
Fly by morning light
(Rush-2112-A Passage to Bangkok)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,988
219
63
Toronto
bosox 61 (Wakefield@Helling)
--Sox at -160 looks way too high, though I'd be surprised if they didn't come back to take one in this series; over looks righteous if Sox Wake up

Twins 64 (Roney@Santana)
--Tigers have been hitting some, and hit lefties better in general; Santana has good stuff but has been cold lately; Roney has some good stuff but has been colder lately; PV-6 on Twins at -230; PV+2 on Tigers at +200, but 36% sucks and I've missed a couple of shots with Roney already - I call 50% for the runline, making the line look even; it's been a high-scoring series so far, but I call 58% on the under 8.5, giving me PV+8 at the +100
PLAYING:
under 8.5 +100
1.5/1.5

Royals 55 (Gonzalez@Gobble)
--is it Thanksgiving already?...Gonzalez has been fairly sharp, with D'Rays going 2-1 over his past 3 to go with his 3.20 era for that span, and D'Rays offense has been smokin' lately, scoring 5 or more runs in 7 of their past 9 (including 15,10,9, and 7,9,8 in their last 3); D'Rays have been hitting either arm lately, while Royals have preffered lefties all year and especially lately; at +140 I would think about the D'Rays here, but the +115 available is a bit low vs a lefties major league debut; I call 58% on the under 11 here, giving me PV+4 at the -115 ... this one looks good the more I think about it, what with the very high #, but totals at Kauffman have been ridiculously over lately, including the first 5 of this current homestand; HP Ron Kulpa helps the under, if anything
PLAYING:
under 11 -115
1.15/1

Mariners 62 (Buehrle@Meche)
--White Sox have been the better hitting team lately, and solid Buehrle has some decent #'s vs M's, but Meche is solid as well, M's have crushed lefties all year, Chisox are worse vs righties, M's are at home, and yesterday's 10-0 M's win makes this one look even more in their favour -- why such a low price?; total looks even at 8.5, with the M's capable of repeating yesterday facing the lefty here; PV+7 at -119
PLAYING:
Mariners -119
2.38/2

A's 57 (Pettitte@Mulder)
--both starters are fairly hot (for their respective selves), but Mulder has had trouble vs Yanks while Pettitte has been fairly good vs A's; price looks even; got a PV+4 on the under 8 at -110 (57%) but this is just under what I normally like, I'm under all over, and both clubs hit well yesterday

blue jays 54 (Escobar@Shields)
--I actually have a small edge to the Angels hurlers here, mostly based on their way-better pen; Angels may play without 3 key bats again here: Fullmer and Glaus for sure, and Erstad possibly; Salmon was recently hurt as well, but only sat for one a few days back; total looks even at 9; PV+4 at +100

Rangers 57 (Anderson@Dickey)
--Rangers have had some troubles with lefties this year, but slight Indians pitching edge is still overcome by better Texan bats and home-field; total always looks low at Arlington with 2 mediocre pitchers going, but I am underman today, so whathey; PV+2 for Rangers at -120

TOMORROW'S JUSTIFICATIONS
---------------------------------------
Braves -1.5 2/2.3
Rockies@Pirates under 9 1.1/1
Marlins -1.5 1/1.15
astros@Marlins under 8.5 1/1.05
padres@Phillies under 8.5 2.2/2
tigers@Twins under 8.5 1.5/1.5
d'rays@Royals under 11 1.15/1
Mariners 2.38/2


Good lunch

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trouble-free transmission, helps your oil's flow
Mama, let me pump your gas, mama, let me do it all
Talkin' 'bout love
(Jones/Page/Plant-Led Zeppelin-Physical Graffiti-Trampled UNDERfoot)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,988
219
63
Toronto
Did it.
Might as well admit it.

Adding:
Blue Jays +100
1/1

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me everybody
Naked and disfigured
Nothing's Shocking
(Jane's Addiction-Nothing's Shocking-Ted, Just Admit It)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,988
219
63
Toronto
FFSake...
nice defense by my clubs the past 2 days - sheesh:rolleyes:
Glad I napped through that Braves fiasco. If it wasn't for totals then I would be way under.

Go M's and Jays!
(Go MJ's?!?!)

70%+ HAD been rockin' since the All-Star break - I guess things had to balance out sometime.
Thank Hendrix for the lame board tomorrow.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Something has to change
Undeniable dilemma
Boredom's not a burden
Anyone should bear
(Tool-Aenima-Stinkfist)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,988
219
63
Toronto
P.S.
I would fade my POD's if I wasn't me...
I think I started at something like 8-1, meaning I have been a total joke since. Last 3 days it has been between one or another, and the OTHER has cashed each time (assuming the M's hold their 4-1 lead ... oops ... 6-1 lead today).
whine, bitch, complain ... alright, I'm done.

Someone score me a tip for the night games.
I see nothing, especially with the Rangers now priced to the moon.
Rangers runline the only thing even remotely tempting right now, but Anderson might surprise, which wouldn't surprise.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
So now as you hear these words telling you now of my state
I tell you to enjoy life, I wish I could but it's too late
(Black Sabbath-Paranoid)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top