If the point of this thread wasn't to show how Obama's economic policies are failing, then what was the point of it? :shrug:
:0corn
taking it to a national level
- Thread starter DOGS THAT BARK
- Start date
:0corn
as far as i can tell these are cities that vote democratic and get the a lot in federal funds. what's the answer? i do not know except handouts every year do not seem to be making a lot of difference.
The thread is about Dem policies failing--
--unless your chalking 10 for 10 up to coincidence--if so we can change venue from poverty to crime-illegitimacy-or any catagory of your choosing--I know--you'll pass.
They fail to understand--
Give a man a fish and you fed him for a day--teach a man to fish and you've fed him for a lifetime.
or one by Thomas Jeffereson
?The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.?
--so lets turn to Gumby and company and see what he has in mind to curb this class of people dependent on gov/taxpayor
--Why add 30 million (MORE) including illegals to largest subsidy in history--and file lawsuits against states trying curb illegals.
Here's a thought DTB,
Why not hire "No hablas" to build a paved road, with watering stations, covered and air conditioned snack shacks from Mexico thru AZ, CA, TX, NM....
But wait, the Government is too stupid to realize that the asphalt is not durable enough for those extreme temps. Wait, yes they do, that's their plan to continue to buy a 600 dollar hammer and send those crews out there every 3 years so they get the plush govt. contract at prevailing wages instead of pouring concrete. Sorry Raymond, you get corn holed, AGAIN :facepalm:
Since the roads will be built for easy access, Border Patrol will end up being escorts for the invasion and driving the Disney Land style trams that shuttle visitors from the parking lot to the park.
one from the archives--knew this one could be brought back bout every other month --liberals only counter to decades of trends stats and facts--
Ah, this one again. I remember commenting on it to crickets last time, in my assessment of Krauthammer. So, I'll post it again, since it's brought up again:
To put it simply, I think that many in this country that disagree with actions taken by the Obama administration subscribe to thoughts and theories that Krauthammer (and others) tries to distance himself from. He doesn't deal with the assessments, he just says that all of them are irrational in all cases, and are not worthy of discussion. Which is my point - he argues that the claims are baseless and incorrect, without allowing that any of them can have any value and substance. He ridicules the opposition for using the broad paintbrush, while doing the very same thing in response (which of course is not a response at all).
And so it goes...
So then, it appears the point you're trying to make is that poverty is a local issue.
Since you used 2006 Census Bureau data to make your point, you obviously don't hold the White House or Congress accountable for poverty, but instead you lay urban poverty squarely on the shoulders of the Democratic mayors of many of our major cities.
Of course, I think you're wrong, but it's good to know where you stand on this issue. I'll remember that the next time you try to blame the White House or Congress for poverty in the U.S. :0008
--the point I'm trying to make once again is in initial post--unless you have some objections to the facts-- your changing topics/race baiting and other tactics--are mute.
--any objections to the validity of the facts??
--if not can you draw any conclusions from the facts--or will it once again be the umpteenth time be the ole--
:00x7
Changing topics? :shrug:
Race baiting? :shrug:
You're trying to make the case that urban poverty's the result of the failed policies of Democrat mayors. So I'm just going to reference this thread every time you blame poverty on the White House or Congress.
You can't have it both ways.
