Tax Deductions

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,884
693
113
50
TX
:lol::lol::lol: This is the most absurd thing I have read in a while, this lady is a nutjob

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...xchange-for-tax-deductions.html?intcmp=hplnws

Dem wants to drug-test 'top 1%' in exchange for tax deductions
Published June 17, 2016 FoxNews.com
Facebook216 Twitter76 livefyre607 Email Print

A Democratic lawmaker is offering a twist on calls by Republican colleagues to drug-test people applying for government welfare benefits?proposing to force those in upper-income brackets to pass drug tests to receive tax deductions.

Wisconsin Rep. Gwen Moore introduced the Top 1% Accountability Act on Thursday.

The bill calls for individuals who claim itemized deductions over $150,000 to submit a recent and clean drug test or else they ?may not elect to itemize deductions for the taxable year.? Instead, they?d be restricted to the lower standard deduction. Households claiming $150,000 in deductions would likely be earning much more than that.

The bill stands little chance of advancing in the Republican-controlled Congress.

Republicans who have pushed drug screening for welfare recipients at the state level have said it?s a way to safeguard taxpayer money.

But Moore Communications Director Eric Harris said the congresswoman was ?sick and tired of Republicans who criminalize poverty.? He added, ?The idea that those battling poverty are more susceptible to substance abuse is as absurd as it is offensive.?

Moore, a single mother of three, used to be a food stamp recipient. Flipping the script, she told The Guardian: ?We might really save some money by drug-testing folks on Wall Street, who might have a little cocaine before they get their deal done.?

Harris said acceptable drug tests would include those from an employer, a certified state program or a medical review officer.

FoxNews.com?s Liz Torrey contributed to this report.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
So you're all for testing low income people but against texting the wealthy, that's basically what you're saying right? So restrictive limitations should only be enforced on the downtrodden and those that actually need them when receiving government entitlements, whereas those needing them least should be privileged and unrestricted? That's called elitism and is a form of communism the Nazi party employed. That's your picture of a free America? Is that how you see equal rights and civil equality?
You should really sit down and reexamine some things hedge, maybe think about what you want the future of this country to look like when your children are turning eighteen. Just sayin

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top