- Dec 18, 2020
- 1,319
- 216
- 63
Adding
Rams -4 -120
Rams -9 +165
Cam akers over 63.5 rushing -120
Odell to score a td +120
Teams that burnt cash in season also lost the SB ats or s/u
Patriots 2007 10-6 but end of year and Playoffs 2-8 ATS lost the SB to Giants as a huge 12 point chalk
0-1
2011 9/7 in season -3 in SB s/u loss to Giants 2nd time Giants beat them in New engalnd also
0-2
2014 Seatle 9/7 ATS -1 S/U Loss to Pats 24-28
0-3
2016 falcons 9/7 ats +3 lost SB in OT 28-34 (note low ranked SOS plus LOST to TB 1st home game )
0-4
2017 Patriots 11/5 in season -4 in SB s/u loss to eagles who also were great ats 10/5 (benched last game ) Patriots had 100% cover jinx of Playbook and madden cover jinx
0-5
2018 Rams 7/9 in season +2 in SB LOST 3-13
0-6
2012 49ERS 9/7 ats -4.5 S/U loss in SB 31-34
0-7
2021 CHIEFS 7/9 ats -3 IN superbowl S/U loss 9-31 (vegas goofed they knew Chiefs were injured plus losing thier center in finals but made them a fav.
at end they went 2-6 ats NOT counting final game at home they benched to chargers as a 7 pt home dog
0-8 100% losers in all superbowls
Rams went 7-10 ATS in season Bengals went 10-7 ATS
WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
Scrappy says Bengals are the play based on regular season ATS.
Rams were 7-10 ATS hence burned money. Those that do that vs teams that didn't, ie Bemgals 10-7 ATS, either lose ATS or S/U in super bowl.
That's his claim, i'm just trying to help decode it for you :0008
It's all garbage. Plus he's big mush. Hope he's on the Bengals. :0074
Easy-- you like these as much as the Bucs last year ?
Adding
Rams -4 -120
Rams -9 +165
Cam akers over 63.5 rushing -120
Odell to score a td +120
So far I have one bet locked in?..
Will there be a safety
Yes!!!! +900
✅✅✅✅Odell tdAdding
Rams -4 -120
Rams -9 +165
Cam akers over 63.5 rushing -120
Odell to score a td +120
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
