The Bowling Green Massacre
- Thread starter ChrryBlstr
- Start date
Remember when people would get fired for lying to the American people?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...trump-muslim-ban-iraqi-refugees-a7560726.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...trump-muslim-ban-iraqi-refugees-a7560726.html
Did Susan Rice get fired for lying to American people?
Remember when Obama said there were 57 states?
How about when he gave speech at Air Base that "No foreign based attacks happened in US during his 8 years.?" The troops could not believe what he was saying.
Remember when he called Ft Hood massacre " workplace violence"?
Did Clinton get fired for all of her lies?
Pelosi this week lied when she said no illegals in SF can committed a crime.
Wonder what the Steinle family thought about that claim.
How about Josh Earnest saying there were no scandals during Obama's 8 years?
That may have been the biggest lie of all.
Remember when Obama said there were 57 states?
How about when he gave speech at Air Base that "No foreign based attacks happened in US during his 8 years.?" The troops could not believe what he was saying.
Remember when he called Ft Hood massacre " workplace violence"?
Did Clinton get fired for all of her lies?
Pelosi this week lied when she said no illegals in SF can committed a crime.
Wonder what the Steinle family thought about that claim.
How about Josh Earnest saying there were no scandals during Obama's 8 years?
That may have been the biggest lie of all.
Partisan politics yet AGAIN?!! IF all of what you said did occur, then yes, all of your aforementioned individuals should have been chastised when it occurred.
Re: Pelosi: Are these the statements that you're referring to? "I do want to say to you, that in our sanctuary cities, our people are not disobeying the law. These are law-abiding citizens, it enables them to be there without being reported to ICE in case of another crime that they might bear witness to." If so, aren't you extrapolating just a little given your political bias?
Can't you critique what has transpired on its own merit? Should Conway's untruths and public transgressions be ignored because "others have lied in the past"? Or should she be given free reign to provide alternative facts as she pleases because "everyone does it"?
Peace!
Pelosi said " Our people are not disobeying the law". Does that statement not include the drug dealer who was deported six times and killed Kate Steinle?
It all depends on the context and her intent.
Now, if she was being completely inclusive in her claim, then yes, she was just flat out lying.
If she was making a broad generalization about the current situation, remember that Steinle's accidental shooting/murder occurred in 2015, then she may have a point. Although using sweeping generalizations and broad statements are, for the most part, highly ineffective and inaccurate.
Now what about the rest of my questions?
Are you accepting of Conway's "alternate facts" because of who she works for and what side she's on? It's a fairly straightforward question.
Peace!
She is a shrill just like Gibbs and Earnest who many times were misleading or lying.
How about Obama in his Super Bowl interview w O'Reilly saying there was not a smidgen of evidence of any scandal with IRS. What a crock that was.
Earnest said there were no scandels under Obama.
Va?
Fast & Furious?
Benghazi?
IRS?
Russian Hacking?
Clinton's Security Breaches?
Iranian Deal?
Why be worried about Conway when free speech is being denied in Columbia and in UCB?
How about Obama in his Super Bowl interview w O'Reilly saying there was not a smidgen of evidence of any scandal with IRS. What a crock that was.
Earnest said there were no scandels under Obama.
Va?
Fast & Furious?
Benghazi?
IRS?
Russian Hacking?
Clinton's Security Breaches?
Iranian Deal?
Why be worried about Conway when free speech is being denied in Columbia and in UCB?
Well, at least you acknowledge the untruths. That's a start.
And yes, any form of repression and oppression is highly problematic and should be confronted and criticized.
Regarding UCB, there was no denial of free speech. He was actually given a forum and only cleared out once the violence began. The appearance of the black bloc and violence was quite interesting though, as they tend to mostly appear in high profile public venues and not universities. Remember the last protest at Berkeley where the students were pepper sprayed? No black bloc there. So, I asked around, and here are some responses:
"My nephew is currently attending Berkeley and was at the demonstration last night. He texted my sister and I and siad the demonstration was peaceful until a group of masked outsiders showed up and started the violence. The question is: who were they and who sent them."
"My friend was there last night and said it seemed odd the people that were trying to rile up others and start shit. She approached one guy and literally asked him why he was trying to incite violence and he stopped looked at her and ran into the crowd. She said it felt like the people starting things had nothing to do with the protest. She also said there was little to no destruction and that some video she's seen are not even Berkeley. There is something really dark happening for sure."
"The police also reported that the ones being violent were not students. That group was way to organized. All sporting similar outfits and all using fireworks. Good way to make sure your actions are noticed while at the same time causing minimal harm to people."
Who knows who this group was. But if they were hired to primarily delegitimize the students' concerns, then it wouldn't be the first time agent provocateurs were employed by the State to disrupt and criminalize peaceful protests. And it certainly won't be the last.
Peace!
How do you feel about her lying to the American public? This isn't being wrong, like Susan Rice, this is flat out MAKING SHIT UP. LOL. Keep making excuses. It's week #2 and you're wearing yourself out trying to defend them.
