The global warming hoax
- Thread starter hedgehog
- Start date
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/guKqNzLT_Jw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Scott: Despite all the scientific evidence and the changes in the natural world around you, you choose to believe what someone on TV tells you to believe. :0054
Scientific Evidence :00x7
Fox News
opcorn2
Scientific Evidence :00x7
Fox News
opcorn2
Scott: Despite all the scientific evidence and the changes in the natural world around you, you choose to believe what someone on TV tells you to believe. :0054
Scientific Evidence :00x7
Fox News
Al Gore is set up to make BILLIONS with his Global Warming Scheme, he's a LYING FRAUD.
JMHO
Gore's 'carbon offsets' paid to firm he owns
Critics say justification for energy-rich lifestyle serves as way for former VP to profit
Published: 03/02/2007 at 4:13 PM
Al Gore defends his extraordinary personal energy usage by telling critics he maintains a ?carbon neutral? lifestyle by buying ?carbon offsets,? but the company that receives his payments turns out to be partly owned and chaired by the former vice president himself.
Gore has built a ?green money-making machine capable of eventually generating billions of dollars for investors, including himself, but he set it up so that the average Joe can?t afford to play on Gore?s terms,? writes blogger Dan Riehl.
Gore has described the lifestyle he and his wife Tipper live as ?carbon neutral,? meaning he tries to offset any energy usage, including plane flights and car trips, by ?purchasing verifiable reductions in CO2 elsewhere.?
But it turns out he pays for his extra-large carbon footprint through Generation Investment Management, a London-based company with offices in Washington, D.C., for which he serves as chairman. The company was established to take financial advantage of new technologies and solutions related to combating ?global warming,? reports blogger Bill Hobbs.
Generation Investment Management?s U.S. branch is headed by a former Gore staffer and fund-raiser, Peter S. Knight, who once was the target of probes by the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice.
Hobbs points out Gore stands to make a lot of money from his promotion of the alleged ?global warming? threat, which is disputed by many mainstream scientists.
?In other words, he ?buys? his ?carbon offsets? from himself, through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to himself,? Hobbs writes. ?To be blunt, Gore doesn?t buy ?carbon offsets? through Generation Investment Management ? he buys stocks.?
As WND reported, Gore, whose film warning of a coming cataclysm due to man-made ?global warming? won two Oscars, has a mansion in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville that consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, citing data from the Nashville Electric Service.
The think tanks says since the release of Gore?s film, the former presidential candidate?s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kilowatt-hours per month in 2005, to 18,400 per month in 2006.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editor?s note: The current global warming frenzy is exposed as never before in the March edition of WND?s acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, in an issue titled, HYSTERIA: Exposing the secret agenda behind today?s obsession with global warming.?
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2007/03/40445/#yHHiI8bs4i6BrlJB.99
Critics say justification for energy-rich lifestyle serves as way for former VP to profit
Published: 03/02/2007 at 4:13 PM
Al Gore defends his extraordinary personal energy usage by telling critics he maintains a ?carbon neutral? lifestyle by buying ?carbon offsets,? but the company that receives his payments turns out to be partly owned and chaired by the former vice president himself.
Gore has built a ?green money-making machine capable of eventually generating billions of dollars for investors, including himself, but he set it up so that the average Joe can?t afford to play on Gore?s terms,? writes blogger Dan Riehl.
Gore has described the lifestyle he and his wife Tipper live as ?carbon neutral,? meaning he tries to offset any energy usage, including plane flights and car trips, by ?purchasing verifiable reductions in CO2 elsewhere.?
But it turns out he pays for his extra-large carbon footprint through Generation Investment Management, a London-based company with offices in Washington, D.C., for which he serves as chairman. The company was established to take financial advantage of new technologies and solutions related to combating ?global warming,? reports blogger Bill Hobbs.
Generation Investment Management?s U.S. branch is headed by a former Gore staffer and fund-raiser, Peter S. Knight, who once was the target of probes by the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice.
Hobbs points out Gore stands to make a lot of money from his promotion of the alleged ?global warming? threat, which is disputed by many mainstream scientists.
?In other words, he ?buys? his ?carbon offsets? from himself, through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to himself,? Hobbs writes. ?To be blunt, Gore doesn?t buy ?carbon offsets? through Generation Investment Management ? he buys stocks.?
As WND reported, Gore, whose film warning of a coming cataclysm due to man-made ?global warming? won two Oscars, has a mansion in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville that consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, citing data from the Nashville Electric Service.
The think tanks says since the release of Gore?s film, the former presidential candidate?s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kilowatt-hours per month in 2005, to 18,400 per month in 2006.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editor?s note: The current global warming frenzy is exposed as never before in the March edition of WND?s acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, in an issue titled, HYSTERIA: Exposing the secret agenda behind today?s obsession with global warming.?
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2007/03/40445/#yHHiI8bs4i6BrlJB.99
Scientific evidence?
Humanity's hubris is never more apparent than here.
The Earth is say, a billion years old?
Yet, we want to think that because off somewhat shady recordings of data that have been collected over the last, I'll be generous, 2 decades, that the world is warming.
AND, we also know the cause.
Humanity's hubris is never more apparent than here.
The Earth is say, a billion years old?
Yet, we want to think that because off somewhat shady recordings of data that have been collected over the last, I'll be generous, 2 decades, that the world is warming.
AND, we also know the cause.
I will side mostly with the scientists on this one. My ass has been significantly warmer and my hearing bill much less past 5 years. I live 2 hours from the coldest place in the main US. We all own air conditioners now, they were a rarity here until the last 10 years or so. Could be just a trend but like I said I'll believe the scientists
"What if Australia was melting as quickly as the Arctic?
This year saw the largest recorded melting of Arctic sea ice, demonstrating the effect of global warming. Sea ice coverage this past northern summer was 3.8 million km2 less than the average in the 1980s. That is an area approximately half the size of Australia!! In the face of this evidence surely scepticism must also be melting away?"
This year saw the largest recorded melting of Arctic sea ice, demonstrating the effect of global warming. Sea ice coverage this past northern summer was 3.8 million km2 less than the average in the 1980s. That is an area approximately half the size of Australia!! In the face of this evidence surely scepticism must also be melting away?"
Last edited:
You do not want to believe the guy who believes what wikipedia says instead of the scientist?
But Hedge is so wise about so much. :shrug:
Mid 60s today here, 60s all weekend and next week. Average temps are in the 40s at this point.
Record temps in Australia, so bad they had to add new colors to the forecasted temperature maps because they are going to temps they have never seen before.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20937509
Record temps in Australia, so bad they had to add new colors to the forecasted temperature maps because they are going to temps they have never seen before.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20937509
The Corruption of the Temperature Record
Posted by Dan McGrath in Climate History, Corruption, Global Cooling, James Hansen, Junk Science, Mythical Consensus, Real Science
Hat-tip to Climate Depot.
A couple interesting articles popped up today about tampering with the historical temperature data at NASA?s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). It seems that the real, unfudged data shows a steady cooling trend from 1930 to 1999.
Have a look a these articles from the Real Science Blog:
Why (James) Hansen had to corrupt the Temperature Record
Uncorrupted Temperature Data Showed Cooling from 1930-1999
GISS Blocking Access to Archived Data
Posted by Dan McGrath in Climate History, Corruption, Global Cooling, James Hansen, Junk Science, Mythical Consensus, Real Science
Hat-tip to Climate Depot.
A couple interesting articles popped up today about tampering with the historical temperature data at NASA?s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). It seems that the real, unfudged data shows a steady cooling trend from 1930 to 1999.
Have a look a these articles from the Real Science Blog:
Why (James) Hansen had to corrupt the Temperature Record
Uncorrupted Temperature Data Showed Cooling from 1930-1999
GISS Blocking Access to Archived Data
