For decades I've read study after study showing that getting folks into obesity, smoking, sedentary living, risky hobbies, etc all help reduce overall nationwide healthcare costs 'cause these folks die off earlier. Therefore don't have to spend the huge bucks required for lingering old-people end of life care. Insurance companies, depending on thier individual game plan, it may raise costs--But those companies generally create extra charges whenever they can anyway, however they can get away from it.
but overall, the only preventive medical strategy that might arguably reduce nationwide health care costs is childhood immunization programs. But even there, the data supporting it is very weak.
Here's a
recent restatement of this, as concerns smoking:
"...smokers die some 10 years earlier than nonsmokers, according to the CDC, and those premature deaths provide a savings to Medicare, Social Security, private pensions and other programs."
"Vanderbilt University economist Kip Viscusi studied the net costs of smoking-related spending and savings and found that for every pack of cigarettes smoked, the country reaps a net cost savings of 32 cents."
and another,
as concerns obesity:
"Although effective obesity prevention leads to a decrease in costs of obesity-related diseases, this decrease is offset by cost increases due to diseases unrelated to obesity in life-years gained. Obesity prevention may be an important and cost-effective way of improving public health, but it is not a cure for increasing health expenditures."
and part of this so-called "obesity epidemic" is based on the widespread use of the
breathtakingly stupid BMI index.
as for illegal immigrants, the
burden they place on the health care industry as a whole
is so trivial, it is hardly
worth talking about.
"The current policy discourse that undocumented immigrants are a burden on the public because they overuse public resources is not borne out with data, for either primary care or emergency department care," said Alexander N. Ortega, an associate professor at UCLA's School of Public Health and the study's lead author. "In fact, they seem to be underutilizing the system, given their health needs."
as for the Truthout article--every free marketer I know
loaths the lack of free trade and market incentives in the health care industry. Milton Friedman, for example, famously attacked the doctor's union and it's support of monopolistic and restrictive economic practices for years...but then, this is an article from "straw man" Truthout...