- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,712
- 599
- 113
- 75
http://network.yardbarker.com/mlb/a...39?refmod=backyard&refdst=9754&refsrc=bloguin
28) St. Louis Cardinals ? 1.67
-Dan McLaughlin (play by play)
-Rick Horton (play by play/analyst)
-Al Hrabosky (analyst)
-Tim McCarver (analyst ? select)
Most popular grade: F (31% of voters)
Analysis: There was a shocking lack of homerism by Cardinals fans in this poll ? only 12% of readers gave St. Louis? team an A. Dan McLaughlin didn?t exactly get rave reviews, but based on the negative comments about the analysts he works with, I wonder how much of that negativity is caused by him. And then there?s the McCarver factor.
Reader Comments:
?Dan Mclaughlin is terrible. He is extremely boring and offers no sense of humor or quick wit which is essential when doing baseball.? -paulgordo1330
?Dan is good for the Cards. He obviously pulls for the Cards but is very objective. Al Hrabosky is horrible. I can?t stand him. He brings less to a telecast then Dickie V.? -scottyankey
28) St. Louis Cardinals ? 1.67
-Dan McLaughlin (play by play)
-Rick Horton (play by play/analyst)
-Al Hrabosky (analyst)
-Tim McCarver (analyst ? select)
Most popular grade: F (31% of voters)
Analysis: There was a shocking lack of homerism by Cardinals fans in this poll ? only 12% of readers gave St. Louis? team an A. Dan McLaughlin didn?t exactly get rave reviews, but based on the negative comments about the analysts he works with, I wonder how much of that negativity is caused by him. And then there?s the McCarver factor.
Reader Comments:
?Dan Mclaughlin is terrible. He is extremely boring and offers no sense of humor or quick wit which is essential when doing baseball.? -paulgordo1330
?Dan is good for the Cards. He obviously pulls for the Cards but is very objective. Al Hrabosky is horrible. I can?t stand him. He brings less to a telecast then Dickie V.? -scottyankey
