The Sponge

[Cie]

Are you 4 years old?

If the truth about quality contributors leaving the site on account of your presence hurts, then leave. I speak only the truth, which I realize is a foreign concept to you.

BTW, I will undoubtedly accept a capping challenge. We can wager $$, but I will not participate unless we include the stipulation that the loser leaves the site.

I am only comfortable with ncaafb, since at best, I barely keep afloat in the NFL. I donate funds to sportsbooks in all other sports.

I would say a weekly 3 play minimum will do nicely. You can post plays at your convenience, including halftime plays. I admit that I am concerned about allowing you to play halftime wagers because it opens the window for dishonesty. Nonetheless, I will allow you to do so in order to rid this forum of you for good.

 

[Cie]

You are sounding more and more just like Agent. Just start a thread like raymond & beaner did. Then there's no BS involved it will be here for all to see.
I'm starting think these guys maybe right about you. :mj08: Didn't you say you got banned from the last site because you posted to many winners. :shrug:

The guy is so full of $hit that I can smell him over the internet.

 

[vinnie]

.

I would say a weekly 3 play minimum will do nicely. You can post plays at your convenience, including halftime plays. I admit that I am concerned about allowing you to play halftime wagers because it opens the window for dishonesty.

I surprised by this he's already starting the back shuffle.

He sure can't do that in THE HILTON CONTEST plays need to be on Friday. :shrug:

 

[Cie]

I surprised by this he's already starting the back shuffle.

He sure can't do that in THE HILTON CONTEST plays need to be on Friday. :shrug:

He is a fraud. That's why he back-shuffles. I think that ex-con robbed him of his cojones along with all those guns.

 

[The Sponge]

You are sounding more and more just like Agent. Just start a thread like raymond & beaner did. Then there's no BS involved it will be here for all to see.
I'm starting think these guys maybe right about you. :mj08: Didn't you say you got banned from the last site because you posted to many winners. :shrug:

No vinny i never said that. Stop making shit up. I said the moderators at that site had a problem if someone was a better handicapper than they were. Look you can put up your rules all you want but its not gonna happen. I can't make it any simpler and it is what each and every bettor does each and every day. Most of my picks i can post but not all because it gets to hectic mostly at halftimes.

 

[Cie]

No vinny i never said that. Stop making shit up. I said the moderators at that site had a problem if someone was a better handicapper than they were. Look you can put up your rules all you want but its not gonna happen. I can't make it any simpler and it is what each and every bettor does each and every day. Most of my picks i can post but not all because it gets to hectic mostly at halftimes.

This is called crawfishing in Lousiana.

 

[The Sponge]

If the truth about quality contributors leaving the site on account of your presence hurts, then leave. I speak only the truth, which I realize is a foreign concept to you.

BTW, I will undoubtedly accept a capping challenge. We can wager $$, but I will not participate unless we include the stipulation that the loser leaves the site.

I am only comfortable with ncaafb, since at best, I barely keep afloat in the NFL. I donate funds to sportsbooks in all other sports.

I would say a weekly 3 play minimum will do nicely. You can post plays at your convenience, including halftime plays. I admit that I am concerned about allowing you to play halftime wagers because it opens the window for dishonesty. Nonetheless, I will allow you to do so in order to rid this forum of you for good.

What quality poster left and is this fragile? Is it the same guy that tries to run everyone off that he doesn't agree with?

 

[Cie]

What quality poster left and is this fragile? Is it the same guy that tries to run everyone off that he doesn't agree with?

put up or shut up, loser. i think you're a fraud.

 

[Destructor D]

Oddsmakers have just posted the line @ Vegas casinos for this capping contest and action has been terribly one-sided. Sharp money has been pounding the Judge at an alarming rate and raised the opening line from -300 to -500:scared :com: . Bookmakers don't know where to hide as Sponge is going down like a whore in a dark alley. Some notable books aren't accepting bets on the Judge anymore. If you want EASY money, then back the Judge immediately!!! The only people backing the Sponge are Stu Feiner & Jim Feist:142smilie :mj07:

Current Vegas Odds:
Judge -500 Sponge +420

I'm putting 5 dimes on the Judge to win an easy dime:00hour



PS: If anyone wants to give me Even money and take the sponge, then please reply ASAP!

 

[The Sponge]

put up or shut up, loser. i think you're a fraud.

Im just gonna say this once and hope you can understand it. What Judge and i agree on you are welcome to participate in. I am not getting into 30 different type of contest. I will get in one and that is it. If you don't like the rules then sit out. If you like them join in. It is that simple. A contest based on what we all sign up to do when we sign up with a book. Simple wagering on anything we want with our money and bigger bankroll wins. It is what we do every day if you have a book.
Judge if you want to discuss this thru emails (discussing the rules) get my address from Jack. We can start anytime you like. I will probably be out the rest of the day.

 

[Cie]

Im just gonna say this once and hope you can understand it. What Judge and i agree on you are welcome to participate in. I am not getting into 30 different type of contest. I will get in one and that is it. If you don't like the rules then sit out. If you like them join in. It is that simple. A contest based on what we all sign up to do when we sign up with a book. Simple wagering on anything we want with our money and bigger bankroll wins. It is what we do every day if you have a book.
Judge if you want to discuss this thru emails (discussing the rules) get my address from Jack. We can start anytime you like. I will probably be out the rest of the day.

I am honestly trying to rid the site of you. No more, no less. Not sure why I can't keep you on ignore, but will try once again. The bottom line, I feel you are a fraud.

GL Judge....

 

[The Judge]

What Judge and i agree on you are welcome to participate in.

I am not interested in a contest against multiple participants, Sponge. I am taking you up on the challenge that you posted and that is it.

I am interested in working out something that we can both agree on but the scenario that you are suggesting just does not work for me. Monitoring accounts to see who has the largest at the end of the season is problematic for a number of reasons. First of all, I am not too big on giving someone else access to my account and secondly, I use multiple outs to get the best line available. Playing with a single book for the entire season is not an option for me and I am surprised that you would be willing to be locked into whatever line a particular book put up. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Another thing is I will make a number of small value wagers throughout the season that I may not want to have as contest plays. Finally, basketball season overlaps with football and keeping those wagers seperate would be a logistic nightmare. I understand the premise of seeing which is the better gambler but 99% of contests use best bet plays and your scenario simply does not work.

What is wrong with the standard contest format of using five plays per week like the Hilton contest? I am even alright with posting plays based on a unit ranking from 1 to 5 or something like that if you want. As far as ?real time? betting, I also want the option to post plays anytime before kickoff. If one of us can?t be near a computer in time to post a play, so be it but I am pretty much married to my laptop during football season as I seldom call a play in on the phone. Having the time to get a wager in at a book is really no different than having the time to post plays in a contest even if you are talking about halftime plays.

It seems like you are not real big on the idea of each of us posting up funds to make it interesting but I am not really interested in bragging rights or any shit like that so if you don?t want to make a wager on your performance against mine then I guess I am wasting my time.

You said that you would challenge anyone on this site or for that matter, the world. I accept your challenge and would like the chance to see what kind of game you?ve got so let?s find some way to make this work. Don?t let the haters get to you, let?s do this.

 

[Cie]

I am not interested in a contest against multiple participants, Sponge. I am taking you up on the challenge that you posted and that is it.

I am interested in working out something that we can both agree on but the scenario that you are suggesting just does not work for me. Monitoring accounts to see who has the largest at the end of the season is problematic for a number of reasons. First of all, I am not too big on giving someone else access to my account and secondly, I use multiple outs to get the best line available. Playing with a single book for the entire season is not an option for me and I am surprised that you would be willing to be locked into whatever line a particular book put up. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Another thing is I will make a number of small value wagers throughout the season that I may not want to have as contest plays. I understand the premise of seeing which is the better gambler but 99% of contests use best bet plays.

What is wrong with the standard contest format of using five plays per week like the Hilton contest? I am even alright with posting plays based on a unit ranking from 1 to 5 or something like that if you want. As far as ?real time? betting, I also want the option to post plays anytime before kickoff. If one of us can?t be near a computer in time to post a play, so be it but I am pretty much married to my laptop during football season as I seldom call a play in on the phone. Having the time to get a wager in at a book is really no different than having the time to post plays in a contest even if you are talking about halftime plays.

It seems like you are not real big on the idea of each of us posting up funds to make it interesting but I am not really interested in bragging rights or any shit like that so if you don?t want to make a wager on your performance against mine then I guess I am wasting my time.

You said that you would challenge anyone on this site or for that matter, the world. I would like the chance to see what kind of game you?ve got so let?s find some way to make this work. Don?t let the haters get to you, let?s do this.

Hola Judge. Just wanted to let you know I am not trying to jump in on your action. Rather , I was trying to perform a public service. Thanks for your contributions the site, and I wish you the best of luck going forward.....

 

[The Sponge]

I am not interested in a contest against multiple participants, Sponge. I am taking you up on the challenge that you posted and that is it.

I am interested in working out something that we can both agree on but the scenario that you are suggesting just does not work for me. Monitoring accounts to see who has the largest at the end of the season is problematic for a number of reasons. First of all, I am not too big on giving someone else access to my account and secondly, I use multiple outs to get the best line available. Playing with a single book for the entire season is not an option for me and I am surprised that you would be willing to be locked into whatever line a particular book put up. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Another thing is I will make a number of small value wagers throughout the season that I may not want to have as contest plays. Finally, basketball season overlaps with football and keeping those wagers seperate would be a logistic nightmare. I understand the premise of seeing which is the better gambler but 99% of contests use best bet plays and your scenario simply does not work.

What is wrong with the standard contest format of using five plays per week like the Hilton contest? I am even alright with posting plays based on a unit ranking from 1 to 5 or something like that if you want. As far as ?real time? betting, I also want the option to post plays anytime before kickoff. If one of us can?t be near a computer in time to post a play, so be it but I am pretty much married to my laptop during football season as I seldom call a play in on the phone. Having the time to get a wager in at a book is really no different than having the time to post plays in a contest even if you are talking about halftime plays.

It seems like you are not real big on the idea of each of us posting up funds to make it interesting but I am not really interested in bragging rights or any shit like that so if you don?t want to make a wager on your performance against mine then I guess I am wasting my time.

You said that you would challenge anyone on this site or for that matter, the world. I accept your challenge and would like the chance to see what kind of game you?ve got so let?s find some way to make this work. Don?t let the haters get to you, let?s do this.

We will work something out and im not sure where you get this idea of me not wanting to post a wager on it. I don't have a problem with that at all. It would be nicer to talk about this thru emails tho. As for the thought of just us in it im all for that. There you go one rule is stated.

 

[RAYMOND]

Nice edit, Skip.

:mj07:

 

[ageecee]

I cant see how this can hurt the site. A bunch of us putting our cash in a book that is sponsered here and see who has the most at the end.

Fawkin ay right lets get it on. Im INNNNNNNN

 

[smurphy]

Current Vegas Odds:
Judge -500 Sponge +420

I'll wait til the odds get better, and take Sponge as an anti-public/value play.

 

[The Sponge]

I'll wait til the odds get better, and take Sponge as an anti-public/value play.

Smurph some of these guys hate me so much that if Judge gave me a 20 game lead in a race to 19 wins they still wouldn't bet on me.

 

[fatdaddycool]

Its Sunday. The time is 6:48 p.m. and TheSponge is still a douche.

Hope this helps,

FDC

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

I'll take Sponge if anyone wants to go $50 or so. Get my email from Jack.