The truth

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,884
693
113
50
TX
af9cd7d6f20d67a030ee7373068765fd.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
?Republicans stand for raw, unbridled evil and greed and ignorance smothered in balloons and ribbons.?
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
Weissinger followed up with an email to CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper.

"I'll show up any day, any time with plenty of firepower to kill any and every one of you fuckers," Weissinger wrote. "It's coming your way and Hell is coming with it."

CAIR reported the voice mail to San Diego police, who tracked Weissinger down and arrested him two weeks later in his home. There, they also recovered an unlicensed AR-15, an assault weapon that is illegal in California, and an illegal large-capacity ammunition magazine.

Weissinger pled guilty in August to felony charges of possessing an illegal firearm and making a criminal threat determined to be a hate crime, along with a misdemeanor charge of interfering with civil rights.

This Tuesday, during a sentencing hearing, Weissinger's attorney advanced a peculiar argument: His client, who was drunk when he made the threats, had committed the crimes ?after a week of watching Fox News over and over.?

?Fox News is a hate machine, spewing out horrible things? about Muslims, attorney Michael Malowney said.

Malowney said he wasn't trying to make up a "lame excuse" for Weissinger -- who he said struggles with depression and anxiety -- or say that "Fox News made him do it." But Malowney did argue that Islamophobia, of the sort propagated by media outlets like Fox News, helped push a susceptible man over the edge.
..............................................


stop now hedge

you could be next in line to spew that neo con hate and end up in jail.

:scared:scared
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
WASHINGTON ? President Barack Obama says he wouldn't run for a third term even if he could. He says the presidency takes a toll on family life, and the office "should be continually renewed by new energy and new ideas."

Obama says in an interview airing on CBS he's not yearning for a third term is because he's confident that things are lot better in the United States than when he came into office.

Obama says the thing that makes him happiest about his presidency ending next January is a chance to get out of what he calls the "the bubble." That's what he calls the tight security controls over his travels outside the White House. He says the bubble is "the hardest thing about the presidency."
..................................................................

another of your idioms down the drain


still could have Marshall Law though
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,884
693
113
50
TX
WASHINGTON ? President Barack Obama says he wouldn't run for a third term even if he could. He says the presidency takes a toll on family life, and the office "should be continually renewed by new energy and new ideas."

Obama says in an interview airing on CBS he's not yearning for a third term is because he's confident that things are lot better in the United States than when he came into office.

Obama says the thing that makes him happiest about his presidency ending next January is a chance to get out of what he calls the "the bubble." That's what he calls the tight security controls over his travels outside the White House. He says the bubble is "the hardest thing about the presidency."
..................................................................

another of your idioms down the drain


still could have Marshall Law though

You all laughed at me. Here it is. right in front of your eyes

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/in...ate-giving-president-unlimited-military-rule/



The U.S. Senate is poised to give President Obama and the next president unprecedented war powers that amount to declaring martial law upon the entire world. Majority leader Mitch McConnell surprised almost everyone last week by saying he has a war resolution ready to be voted on at any time.

The resolution is a new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) for declaring war on ISIS. It would give the president even more power than the AUMF granted to Bush after 9/11, which is still in place today.

?The AUMF put forward by McConnell would not restrict the president?s use of ground troops, nor have any limits related to time or geography. Nor would it touch on the issue of what to do with the 2001 AUMF, which the Obama administration has used to attack ISIS despite that authorization?s instructions to use force against those who planned the 9/11 terrorist attacks.?

Considering what Bush and Obama did with the 2001 AUMF?invading and occupying countries in ?pre-emptive? war, CIA black sites, extrajudicial killings, inventing the term ?enemy combatants? to bypass international law, new forms of torture, drone bombing women and children, and assassinating U.S. citizens?the specter of a new and expanded AUMF is truly frightening.
?This resolution is a total rewrite of the War Powers Clause in the U.S. Constitution,? said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn). ?It is essentially a declaration of international martial law, a sweeping transfer of military power to the president that will allow him or her to send U.S. troops almost anywhere in the world, for almost any reason, with absolutely no limitations.?

McConnell?s resolution is more than what Obama asked for last year, but this is of little relevance since Obama has been carrying out a war against ISIS, including the use of special forces, with no authorization. The administration has refused to put forward a legal framework, insisting that the 2001 AUMF is enough.

As the New York Times pointed out, ISIS was created long after 9/11 and is actually a competitor to al Qaida, which means that Obama?s war on ISIS is not justified under the 2001 AUMF. Even members of Congress recognize that current military operations have no legal basis.

?I believe the war is illegal,? said Sen. Tim Kaine. ?I don?t think there?s a legal justification for it. And I think the greatest danger we end up doing is allowing the president to wage a war without Congress weighing in.?

Using this rationale, Kaine and others in Congress are thrilled to know that a new AUMF could be voted on at any time. Some would prefer more restrictions, but the bottom line is that it represents and abdication of constitutional duties that would give vast military powers to one person.

Sen. John Cornyn expressed the usual platitudes in cheering for the vote, saying ?the people we send in harm?s way need to know that the country is behind them? and ?we also don?t need to tie the hands of the next president by restricting what the president can do.?

For some lawmakers, it?s more about giving the next president unlimited power than it is about Obama. McConnell?s about-face from December, when he expressed no interest in voting on an AUMF, may also be a ploy to make the issue a major talking point in the presidential election. There?s nothing like talk of war to whip up fear in the masses and distract them from substantive issues.

It is no coincidence that just days ago, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said about the fight against ISIS, ?We?re looking for opportunities to do more and there will be boots on the ground and I want to be clear about that.?

Since ISIS is partially a product of American intervention in the Middle East, being cultivated from the Salafist sect to foment regime change in Syria, ?boots on the ground? would complete another cycle for the merchants of death and destruction. The Hegelian Dialectic?create the problem, stoke the reaction, offer the solution?is a tried and true method for endless war.

We have already seen the extremely tenuous connections that war-makers use to justify their death and destruction waged around the world and on their own people. McConnell?s AUMF would clear away any feeble barriers that still stand in the way of a military dictatorship.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/in...-unlimited-military-rule/#uZD6cCUjSOXx77Cs.99

:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared
 

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
You all laughed at me. Here it is. right in front of your eyes

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/in...ate-giving-president-unlimited-military-rule/



The U.S. Senate is poised to give President Obama and the next president unprecedented war powers that amount to declaring martial law upon the entire world. Majority leader Mitch McConnell surprised almost everyone last week by saying he has a war resolution ready to be voted on at any time.

The resolution is a new authorization for use of military force (AUMF) for declaring war on ISIS. It would give the president even more power than the AUMF granted to Bush after 9/11, which is still in place today.

?The AUMF put forward by McConnell would not restrict the president?s use of ground troops, nor have any limits related to time or geography. Nor would it touch on the issue of what to do with the 2001 AUMF, which the Obama administration has used to attack ISIS despite that authorization?s instructions to use force against those who planned the 9/11 terrorist attacks.?

Considering what Bush and Obama did with the 2001 AUMF?invading and occupying countries in ?pre-emptive? war, CIA black sites, extrajudicial killings, inventing the term ?enemy combatants? to bypass international law, new forms of torture, drone bombing women and children, and assassinating U.S. citizens?the specter of a new and expanded AUMF is truly frightening.
?This resolution is a total rewrite of the War Powers Clause in the U.S. Constitution,? said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn). ?It is essentially a declaration of international martial law, a sweeping transfer of military power to the president that will allow him or her to send U.S. troops almost anywhere in the world, for almost any reason, with absolutely no limitations.?

McConnell?s resolution is more than what Obama asked for last year, but this is of little relevance since Obama has been carrying out a war against ISIS, including the use of special forces, with no authorization. The administration has refused to put forward a legal framework, insisting that the 2001 AUMF is enough.

As the New York Times pointed out, ISIS was created long after 9/11 and is actually a competitor to al Qaida, which means that Obama?s war on ISIS is not justified under the 2001 AUMF. Even members of Congress recognize that current military operations have no legal basis.

?I believe the war is illegal,? said Sen. Tim Kaine. ?I don?t think there?s a legal justification for it. And I think the greatest danger we end up doing is allowing the president to wage a war without Congress weighing in.?

Using this rationale, Kaine and others in Congress are thrilled to know that a new AUMF could be voted on at any time. Some would prefer more restrictions, but the bottom line is that it represents and abdication of constitutional duties that would give vast military powers to one person.

Sen. John Cornyn expressed the usual platitudes in cheering for the vote, saying ?the people we send in harm?s way need to know that the country is behind them? and ?we also don?t need to tie the hands of the next president by restricting what the president can do.?

For some lawmakers, it?s more about giving the next president unlimited power than it is about Obama. McConnell?s about-face from December, when he expressed no interest in voting on an AUMF, may also be a ploy to make the issue a major talking point in the presidential election. There?s nothing like talk of war to whip up fear in the masses and distract them from substantive issues.

It is no coincidence that just days ago, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said about the fight against ISIS, ?We?re looking for opportunities to do more and there will be boots on the ground and I want to be clear about that.?

Since ISIS is partially a product of American intervention in the Middle East, being cultivated from the Salafist sect to foment regime change in Syria, ?boots on the ground? would complete another cycle for the merchants of death and destruction. The Hegelian Dialectic?create the problem, stoke the reaction, offer the solution?is a tried and true method for endless war.

We have already seen the extremely tenuous connections that war-makers use to justify their death and destruction waged around the world and on their own people. McConnell?s AUMF would clear away any feeble barriers that still stand in the way of a military dictatorship.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/in...-unlimited-military-rule/#uZD6cCUjSOXx77Cs.99

:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared:scared

Ummmm....I'm not entirely sure if you've actually thought about this, but it would be fairly impossible to enact AND enforce martial law on every single country on the entire planet. FYI.

Peace! :)
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
You really are a fucking compete imbecile hedge. You're by far one of the most ignorant ideologues ever born.

The article CLEARLY STATES THAT IT IS A RESOLUTION PUT FORWARD BY REPUBLICANS TO GIVE UNLIMITED POWER OF WAR TO THE NEXT PRESIDENT. You're so fucking daft you can't even deduce that is your party that's looking to impart martial law.
For fucks sake you're dumber than a musk ox.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,884
693
113
50
TX
Donald trump with unlimited powers :00hour:00hour:00hour:firing::firing::firing:

That's if Obama doesn't declare martial law in the us and become self appointed king
 

HankWilliamsJr

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 10, 2014
1,769
29
0
Donald trump with unlimited powers :00hour:00hour:00hour:firing::firing::firing:

That's if Obama doesn't declare martial law in the us and become self appointed king

hank wories about this day and night

its gonna happen and i will tell you all i told you so.....sad day in america

:nono::nono::nono:
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
Donald trump with unlimited powers :00hour:00hour:00hour:firing::firing::firing:

That's if Obama doesn't declare martial law in the us and become self appointed king
Oh, so now that the article has been explained to you, you're all for it?


Imbecile.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,599
1,898
113
70
home
You really are a fucking compete imbecile hedge. You're by far one of the most ignorant ideologues ever born.

The article CLEARLY STATES THAT IT IS A RESOLUTION PUT FORWARD BY REPUBLICANS TO GIVE UNLIMITED POWER OF WAR TO THE NEXT PRESIDENT. You're so fucking daft you can't even deduce that is your party that's looking to impart martial law.
For fucks sake you're dumber than a musk ox.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Oh, so now that the article has been explained to you, you're all for it?


Imbecile.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
:lol:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top