The War On Terror

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The War On Terror[/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]by Paul Craig Roberts
by Paul Craig Roberts
[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Recently by Paul Craig Roberts: It Is Official: The US Is a Police State[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Does anyone remember the "cakewalk war" that would last six weeks, cost $50?60 billion, and be paid for out of Iraqi oil revenues? [/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Does anyone remember that White House economist Lawrence Lindsey was fired by Dubya because Lindsey estimated that the Iraq war could cost as much as $200 billion?[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Lindsey was fired for over-estimating the cost of a war that, according to Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, has cost 15 times more than Lindsey estimated. And the US still has 50,000 troops in Iraq.[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Does anyone remember that just prior to the US invasion of Iraq, the US government declared victory over the Taliban in Afghanistan?[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Does anyone remember that the reason Dubya gave for invading Iraq was Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, weapons that the US government knew did not exist?[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Are Americans aware that the same neoconservatives who made these fantastic mistakes, or told these fabulous lies, are still in control of the government in Washington?[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The "war on terror" is now in its tenth year. What is it really all about?[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The bottom line answer is that the "war on terror" is about creating real terrorists. The US government desperately needs real terrorists in order to justify its expansion of its wars against Muslim countries and to keep the American people sufficiently fearful that they continue to accept the police state that provides "security from terrorists," but not from the government that has discarded civil liberties. [/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The US government creates terrorists by invading Muslim countries, wrecking infrastructure and killing vast numbers of civilians. The US also creates terrorists by installing puppet governments to rule over Muslims and by using the puppet governments to murder and persecute citizens as is occurring on a vast scale in Pakistan today.[/FONT]
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=135 align=right><TBODY><TR><TD>
<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 120px; HEIGHT: 240px" marginHeight=0 src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=FFFFFF&IS2=1&nou=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=lewrockwell&o=1&p=8&l=as1&m=amazon&f=ifr&asins=0805091416" frameBorder=0 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no></IFRAME>​
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>​
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Neoconservatives used 9/11 to launch their plan for US world hegemony. Their plan fit with the interests of America's ruling oligarchies. Wars are good for the profits of the military/security complex, about which President Eisenhower warned us in vain a half century ago. American hegemony is good for the oil industry's control over resources and resource flows. The transformation of the Middle East into a vast American puppet state serves well the Israel Lobby's Zionist aspirations for Israeli territorial expansion.[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Most Americans cannot see what is happening because of their conditioning. Most Americans believe that their government is the best on earth, that it is morally motivated to help others and to do good, that it rushes aid to countries where there is famine and natural catastrophes. Most believe that their presidents tell the truth, except about their sexual affairs.[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The persistence of these delusions is extraordinary in the face of daily headlines that report US government bullying of, and interference with, virtually every country on earth. The US policy is to buy off, overthrow, or make war on leaders of other countries who represent their peoples' interests instead of American interests. A recent victim was the president of Honduras who had the wild idea that the Honduran government should serve the Honduran people. [/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The American government was able to have the Honduran president discarded, because the Honduran military is trained and supplied by the US military. It is the same case in Pakistan, where the US government has the Pakistani government making war on its own people by invading tribal areas that the Americans consider to be friendly to the Taliban, al Qaeda, "militants" and "terrorists." [/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Earlier this year a deputy US Treasury secretary ordered Pakistan to raise taxes so that the Pakistani government could more effectively make war on its own citizens for the Americans. On October 14 US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered Pakistan to again raise taxes or the US would withhold flood aid. Clinton pressured America's European puppet states to do the same, expressing in the same breath that the US government was worried by British cuts in the military budget. God forbid that the hard-pressed British, still reeling from American financial fraud, don't allocate enough money to fight America's wars.[/FONT]

<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=135 align=right><TBODY><TR><TD>
<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 120px; HEIGHT: 240px" marginHeight=0 src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=FFFFFF&IS2=1&nou=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=lewrockwell&o=1&p=8&l=as1&m=amazon&f=ifr&asins=1439172498" frameBorder=0 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no></IFRAME>​
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>​
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]On Washington's orders, the Pakistani government launched a military offensive against Pakistani citizens in the Swat Valley that killed large numbers of Pakistanis and drove millions of civilians from their homes. Last July the US instructed Pakistan to send its troops against the Pakistani residents of North Waziristan. On July 6 Jason Ditz reported on Antiwar.com that "at America's behest, Pakistan has launched offensives against [the Pakistani provinces of] Swat Valley, Bajaur, South Waziristan, Orakzai, and Khyber."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]A week later Israel's US Senator Carl Levin (D,MI) called for escalating the Obama Administration's policies of US airstrikes against Pakistan's tribal areas. On September 30, the Pakistani newspaper, The Frontier Post, wrote that the American air strikes "are, plain and simple, a naked aggression against Pakistan." [/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The US claims that its forces in Afghanistan have the right to cross into Pakistan in pursuit of "militants." Recently US helicopter gunships killed three Pakistani soldiers who they mistook for Taliban. Pakistan closed the main US supply route to Afghanistan until the Americans apologized.[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Pakistan warned Washington against future attacks. However, US military officials, under pressure from Obama to show progress in the endless Afghan war, responded to Pakistan's warning by calling for expanding the Afghan war into Pakistan. On October 5 the Canadian journalist Eric Margolis wrote that "the US edges closer to invading Pakistan."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]In his book, Obama's Wars, Bob Woodward reports that America's puppet president of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, believes that terrorist bombing attacks inside Pakistan for which the Taliban are blamed are in fact CIA operations designed to destabilize Pakistan and allow Washington to seize Pakistan's nuclear weapons. [/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]To keep Pakistan in line, the US government changed its position that the "Times Square Bombing" was the work of a "lone wolf." Attorney General Eric Holder switched the blame to the "Pakistani Taliban," and Secretary of State Clinton threatened Pakistan with "very serious consequences" for the unsuccessful Times Square bombing, which likely was a false flag operation aimed at Pakistan.[/FONT]

<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=125 align=right><TBODY><TR><TD>
<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 120px; HEIGHT: 240px" marginHeight=0 src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=lewrockwell&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0307396061&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=FFFFFF&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr&nou=1" frameBorder=0 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no></IFRAME>​
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>​
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]To further heighten tensions, on September 1 the eight members of a high-ranking Pakistani military delegation in route to a meeting in Tampa, Florida, with US Central Command, were rudely treated and detained as terrorist suspects at Washington DC's Dulles Airport. [/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]For decades the US government has enabled repeated Israeli military aggression against Lebanon and now appears to be getting into gear for another Israeli assault on the former American protectorate of Lebanon. On October 14 the US government expressed its "outrage" that the Lebanese government had permitted a visit by Iranian President Ahmadinejad, who is the focus of Washington's intense demonization efforts. Israel's representatives in the US Congress threatened to stop US military aid to Lebanon, forgetting that US Rep. Howard Berman (D,CA) has had aid to Lebanon blocked since last August to punish Lebanon for a border clash with Israel. [/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Perhaps the most telling headline of all is the October 14 report, "Somalia's New American Primer Minister." An American has been installed as the Prime Minister of Somalia, an American puppet government in Mogadishu backed up by thousands of Ugandan troops paid by Washington.[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This barely scratches the surface of Washington's benevolence toward other countries and respect for their rights, borders, and lives of their citizens. [/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]
roberts2.jpg
Meanwhile, to silence the whistleblower website WikiLeaks and to prevent any more revelations of American war crimes, the "freedom and democracy" government in DC has closed down WikiLeaks' donations by placing the company that collects its money on its "watch list" and by having the Australian puppet government blacklist WikiLeaks.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]WikiLeaks is now akin to a terrorist organization. The American government's practice of silencing critics will spread across the Internet.[/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Remember, they hate us because we have freedom and democracy, First Amendment rights, habeas corpus, respect for human rights, and show justice and mercy to all.[/FONT]
 

UGA12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2003
7,779
108
63
Between The Hedges
Made it through about 1/3 of this and simply couldn?t read anymore buggie man junk. Say what you will about Bush and Obama but they both do/did things based on their beliefs of what?s best (imo). Part of doing business this way is the fact that you are not always right. Bush looks like an idiot for some of the things that have come out since the invasion of Iraq, and Obama will likely be a one term President due to his belief in the Health care bill among other things(just as Bush I was after his no new taxes fiasco). If you believe Presidents are robots intent on world domination and screwing America along the way then more power to you, but that is not what I see. Anyone can twist events and have 20/20 hindsight, but presidents are humans that must lie in a bed at night and have to contemplate how and what to do based on thousands of factors. Eventually conscious has the final say. Whether or not we agree with those things is different than the theory of a NWO. Not saying politics doesn?t play a part in things as obviously it does, but when it comes to the huge decisions these men have to make, ultimately it comes down to one man?s conscious. I have read enough of your stuff to know you won?t agree and that?s fine, just wanted to give a different position. GL bud.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Made it through about 1/3 of this and simply couldn?t read anymore buggie man junk. Say what you will about Bush and Obama but they both do/did things based on their beliefs of what?s best (imo). Part of doing business this way is the fact that you are not always right. Bush looks like an idiot for some of the things that have come out since the invasion of Iraq, and Obama will likely be a one term President due to his belief in the Health care bill among other things(just as Bush I was after his no new taxes fiasco). If you believe Presidents are robots intent on world domination and screwing America along the way then more power to you, but that is not what I see. Anyone can twist events and have 20/20 hindsight, but presidents are humans that must lie in a bed at night and have to contemplate how and what to do based on thousands of factors. Eventually conscious has the final say. Whether or not we agree with those things is different than the theory of a NWO. Not saying politics doesn?t play a part in things as obviously it does, but when it comes to the huge decisions these men have to make, ultimately it comes down to one man?s conscious. I have read enough of your stuff to know you won?t agree and that?s fine, just wanted to give a different position. GL bud.

This is why we have the 1st A :toast:

At least you didn't go off on some complete wacko tangent and insult every member of my familiy and my dog anf have to use a bunch of effff bombs to express how you feel. :0074
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top