The Way Out of Iraq: A Road Map

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
The Way Out of Iraq: A Road Map
By Mowaffak al-Rubaie

There has been much talk about a withdrawal of U.S. and coalition troops from Iraq, but no defined timeline has yet been set. There is, however, an unofficial "road map" to foreign troop reductions that will eventually lead to total withdrawal of U.S. troops. This road map is based not just on a series of dates but, more important, on the achievement of set objectives for restoring security in Iraq.

Iraq has a total of 18 governorates, which are at differing stages in terms of security. Each will eventually take control of its own security situation, barring a major crisis. But before this happens, each governorate will have to meet stringent minimum requirements as a condition of being granted control. For example, the threat assessment of terrorist activities must be low or on a downward trend. Local police and the Iraqi army must be deemed capable of dealing with criminal gangs, armed groups and militias, and border control. There must be a clear and functioning command-and-control center overseen by the governor, with direct communication to the prime minister's situation room.

Despite the seemingly endless spiral of violence in Iraq today, such a plan is already in place. All the governors have been notified and briefed on the end objective. The current prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, has approved the plan, as have the coalition forces, and assessments of each province have already been done. Nobody believes this is going to be an easy task, but there is Iraqi and coalition resolve to start taking the final steps to have a fully responsible Iraqi government accountable to its people for their governance and security. Thus far four of the 18 provinces are ready for the transfer of power -- two in the north (Irbil and Sulaymaniyah) and two in the south (Maysan and Muthanna). Nine more provinces are nearly ready.

With the governors of each province meeting these strict objectives, Iraq's ambition is to have full control of the country by the end of 2008. In practice this will mean a significant foreign troop reduction. We envisage the U.S. troop presence by year's end to be under 100,000, with most of the remaining troops to return home by the end of 2007.

The eventual removal of coalition troops from Iraqi streets will help the Iraqis, who now see foreign troops as occupiers rather than the liberators they were meant to be. It will remove psychological barriers and the reason that many Iraqis joined the so-called resistance in the first place. The removal of troops will also allow the Iraqi government to engage with some of our neighbors that have to date been at the very least sympathetic to the resistance because of what they call the "coalition occupation." If the sectarian issue continues to cause conflict with Iraq's neighbors, this matter needs to be addressed urgently and openly -- not in the guise of aversion to the presence of foreign troops.

Moreover, the removal of foreign troops will legitimize Iraq's government in the eyes of its people. It has taken what some feel is an eternity to form a government of national unity. This has not been an easy or enviable task, but it represents a significant achievement, considering that many new ministers are working in partisan situations, often with people with whom they share a history of enmity and distrust. By its nature, the government of national unity, because it is working through consensus, could be perceived to be weak. But, again, the drawdown of foreign troops will strengthen our fledgling government to last the full four years it is supposed to.

While Iraq is trying to gain its independence from the United States and the coalition, in terms of taking greater responsibility for its actions, particularly in terms of security, there are still some influential foreign figures trying to spoon-feed our government and take a very proactive role in many key decisions. Though this may provide some benefits in the short term, in the long run it will only serve to make the Iraqi government a weaker one and eventually lead to a culture of dependency. Iraq has to grow out of the shadow of the United States and the coalition, take responsibility for its own decisions, learn from its own mistakes, and find Iraqi solutions to Iraqi problems, with the knowledge that our friends and allies are standing by with support and help should we need it.

The writer is Iraq's national security adviser.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,480
157
63
Bowling Green Ky
Pretty good assessment--almost sounds like GW's response to cut and run crowd-- verbatim ;)

Appears their plan is same as this admins--and what "some" continuely refer to as "no plan" :)
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Cut and run I have not heard anyone say that. I have heard stay the course. Problem is course is not getting better. And we could run out of money over next 5 to 6 years with that plan. However not to worry elections are coming November. Out of the sky will the Reb's have seen the light that all is so much better we can bring home about 30000 troops for a fast start. They want to keep there jobs. They will call it winning not cut and run. That if it happens would be a joke.
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
Why stay on this course ? It's easy to use nice little phrases like cut and run & stay the course. Neither will work. Why don't we come up with a plan that makes sense.
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
The sad thing about this, military tactics were never taken in to consideration, the politics of this war came first. The execution of this mess was left up to those who would do anything for power. This should have been layed in the laps of our best and brightest, but those guy's never got the chance because they were on the other side of the fence of Bush and his gang of cons on one little point. I heard a military guy say today,you start at the end and work back. These guys never got to the end of the story, in their fairy tale theory. The one thing they never considered was health and the lives of our soldiers.This is not cost effective, this can't be the best way to spend our military.
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
bryanz said:
The sad thing about this, military tactics were never taken in to consideration, the politics of this war came first. The execution of this mess was left up to those who would do anything for power. This should have been layed in the laps of our best and brightest, but those guy's never got the chance because they were on the other side of the fence of Bush and his gang of cons on one little point. I heard a military guy say today,you start at the end and work back. These guys never got to the end of the story, in their fairy tale theory. The one thing they never considered was health and the lives of our soldiers.This is not cost effective, this can't be the best way to spend our military.
I think this point certainly has merit. The following is an article by John Walsh which addresses this very thing.

Flunking the Art of War
By: John Walsh


At the very least China's President Hu displayed a sense of humor in presenting a book, of all things, to George W. Bush on his recent visit to the United States. And the choice of Sun-Tzu's fifth century B.C. classic, "The Art of War" was tantalizing. Since Dubya certainly will not penetrate too far into it, I decided to have a look, so that at least one American would honor the Chinese gift by actually reading it. This provided me a rare patriotic surge, much like the rush when I put my tax return in the mailbox.

Sun-Tzu did not disappoint. At almost the very beginning of the second chapter I found a near perfect description of Dubya's ill-fated war on Iraq. To quote:

Master Sun said: The art of warfare is this:

"In joining battle, seek the quick victory. If battle is protracted, your weapons will be blunted and your troops demoralized. If you lay siege to a walled city, you exhaust your strength. If your armies are kept in the field for a long time, your national reserves will not suffice. Where you have blunted your weapons, demoralized your troops, exhausted your strength and depleted all available resources, the neighboring rulers will take advantage of your adversity to strike. And even with the wisest of counsel, you will not be able to turn the ensuing consequences to the good. There never has been a state that has benefited from an extended war."

What a simple and concise description of the quagmire in Iraq! Here Sun-Tzu is providing counsel for an invading army. For the invaded, or in our era for the colonized or occupied, protracted struggle and the inevitable atrocities committed by the invader are both keys to victory. It is certain that the military and the neocon architects of the war know these classical principles of warfare even if Dubya is clueless. One is led to suspect that the neocons knew that a quagmire would ensue in Iraq, and in fact there is evidence for this, but they did not care. They had other goals. (Think Mearscheimer and Walt.*)

In the third chapter, Sun-Tzu makes some further pertinent observations.

Master Sun said: The art of warfare is this:

"It is best to keep one's own state intact; to crush the enemy's state is only a second best. The highest excellence is to attack strategies; the next to attack alliances; the next to attack soldiers; and the worst to attack walled cities. . Therefore the expert in using the military subdues the enemies forces without going to battle."

In other words going to battle is a sign of weakness, a sign that other means were not available. The very fact that the U.S. wages war on Iraq is a sign either of weakness or lack of wisdom, the latter a failure to perceive one's own interests. (Think Mearscheimer and Walt again.*)

In Chapter 13,

Master Sun said:

"Intelligence is of the essence in warfare, it is what the armies depend upon in their every move."

And this has a dual application. In Iraq the Americans are surrounded by the Resistance; it seeps into their every pore like water even though they inhabit the desert. And so the Americans have no intelligence, and all the Abu Ghraib's in the world will not extort the information they want. One does not readily betray one's family and friends.

Finally, in the very first words of Chapter 1, Sun-Tzu offers perhaps his most important observation which we have left for last:

Master Sun said:

"War is a vital matter of state. It is the field on which life or death is determined and the road which leads to either survival or ruin, and must be examined with greatest care.

"Therefore to gauge the outcome of war we must appraise the situation on the basis of the following five criteria, and compare the two sides by assessing their relative strengths. The first of the five criteria is the way (tao). The way (tao) is what brings the thinking of the people in line with their superiors."

I think the polls that show the overwhelming majority of Americans feel that the war in Iraq is a mistake and not worth fighting, certainly not worth dying for. This amounts to bad tao for Bush and his accomplices in both War Parties.
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
How does one send men into battle to be slaughtered ? If they did not know going in about the IUD's, that's unforgivable, if the did know, that's _______________ .( fill in the blank ) I think Justice requires,that the military planners of this war do the Honorable thing; put guns in their mouths. How do these wise guys live with themselves ?
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
Some may think that I went to far or how can you think that. I have never thought about killing myself, but if I was involved with the execution & planning of this war, I would have to consider it.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,480
157
63
Bowling Green Ky
Thoughts???---When you enlist in armed forces you take an oath--which doesn't include "i'll will take paycheck and benefits as long a I don't have to be involved in war.

and on those being slaughtered--you might look to your home city where more die by aids in any year than troops in Iraq--and all they have to do to stop is sit down and keep their mouths shut to prevent it.;)
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
What ? When you enlist in the armed forces you take all that goes with it. AND these people have. All I'm am saying is, spend their lives as if it were your own. If men must die, make it count.
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
DOGS THAT BARK said:
you might look to your home city where more die by aids in any year than troops in Iraq
You can?t possibly believe this.

Through the end of 2005, the estimated total dead from AIDS in North America, Western & Central Europe combined is 30,000.
(link to AIDS death statisticss)


American Military Deaths in Iraq
Since war began (3/19/03): 2,512
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03) 2,375
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 2,047
Since Handover (6/29/04): 1,646
Since Election (1/31/05): 1,076
(link to US Military death statistics)
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
The guys who sent our men to Iraq have no conscience.
They are in it strictly for the money. No other reason to be there.
Still, this long? No improvement in the infrastructure? We are supposed to have the best engineers and the strongest military in the world. Yet we allow our leaders to place our soldiers in an unattainable position of what?....
I dunno you tell me what the "course" is.
Meanwhile the money rolls in for the friends and relatives of the Bush Family.
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
Dog, your last post is a slap in the face of most of our military, they don't complain, they do their job, but that doesn't make it right. Why don't we use the knowledge and experience of guys like John Murtha ? I have a Friend that served for 30 yrs, he said to me: They would have to put him in jail ,he would not serve now, he can't believe the way our men are being used.
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
My bottom line on this war. I don't care who wins what political race, who has the house or the senate, we can't keep hanging our guys out to dry. Bush and the boy's sit on this thing like they are waiting for a stock to turn around. They have time, most of them if not all of them are not going to get a call in the morning,thanking them for the service of their son. I'm not stupid, I know in life we have to sacrifice some for the good of the rest but, we can do better, we have to make it count. I'm a #'s guy, this does't add up, you can't sell me this at any price.
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
What really kills me is the way some of these panderers will use the cut and run phrase like a weapon, these guys who have never been in combat,who don't know the feeling of seeing your buddies killed and mutilated, are willing to throw more good lives on the heap of the DEATH ,MIND AND BODY DISMEMBERED PILE. Cut and run, means not throwing good after bad. It means enough already, do something different,change the course, HELLO,It's not working. We can't win the war were fighting, what's it going to take, what's the # of men Bush and the boys Will say enough is enough. You know they have a number. We went there because there was a direct immediate threat, fine, we found all the WMD's we are going to find. Why are we still trying to fight a conventional war on their turf day after day. There is no number we can kill to end this thing and the white flag is waved. We have been fighting terror around the world all of my life and will be long after I'm gone. We are there to do what Bush said he was not in the business of doing; NATION BUILD. We got the bad guy,we got all those bad wmd's, now we ask our military to pay the ultimate price so we can turn on the lights and water, build schools,teach our way of life to people that will always hate us.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top