Is anyone, besides me, thinking of taking Kentucky -7?
I think Vegas makes tons from bettors wagering on what they "see".
Kentucky played sub par...for one thing, they couldn't shoot.
Marquette played a beautiful game...you name it they did it and if you couldn't find a word for it, they still did it.
Wade's performance was amazing.
And Diener's wasn't half bad either.
If "Seeing is Believing", then Marquette made believers out of lottsa' folks.
But in sportsbetting, what you see in a high profile game can get you smacked in the head.
I have several lumps on my head as evidence.
Kentucky -7
I think Vegas makes tons from bettors wagering on what they "see".
Kentucky played sub par...for one thing, they couldn't shoot.
Marquette played a beautiful game...you name it they did it and if you couldn't find a word for it, they still did it.
Wade's performance was amazing.
And Diener's wasn't half bad either.
If "Seeing is Believing", then Marquette made believers out of lottsa' folks.
But in sportsbetting, what you see in a high profile game can get you smacked in the head.
I have several lumps on my head as evidence.
Kentucky -7

