This could get interesting
- Thread starter DOGS THAT BARK
- Start date
Couldn't agree more DJ if its true run it and let us see. I don't care who the president was. All you hear all the time is the liberal media this the liberal media that well when it comes to honesty i sure as hell will listen to the liberal media before i listen to stations that get caught bullshitting and spinning all the time. This prick at Disney Eisner didn't he make a couple billion 5 years ago and then turned around and cut his employees health care?
All Conservatives should watch Farhenheit and all Liberals should watch this Disney thing. The only person who gets a free pass from viewing anything is the "Centrist" Kosar.
and as for going back to blame Clinton for Bin Laden....well, maybe we should focus more on the fact that Bin Laden is in Pakistan RIGHT NOW. What the hell are we doing about that RIGHT NOW?
and as for going back to blame Clinton for Bin Laden....well, maybe we should focus more on the fact that Bin Laden is in Pakistan RIGHT NOW. What the hell are we doing about that RIGHT NOW?
First off, there were no lies in Moores thing. At least none that anyone can name. We already know about the lies in this ABC thing. Why should anybody watch it? And if anyone knows of any lies in the Moore movie I would like to know about them. Once again the Weasel tries to get away with rewriting the present. Now he even has the "Liberal" Hollywood Types" doing it. :nono:
robert...thank you,buddy.......my attempts at humor...admittedly lame on occasion....are almost always taken literally...
thank you for lightening the load.....:sadwave:
what i want to see is the part in the movie where sandy burglar(who seems to be doing much of the bitching)uses his underpants as a carrying device for classified documents from the national archives....pertaining to 9/11....
i believe he called the episode “an honest mistake,” and denied criminal wrongdoing.....
why,that's the same thing I said when I was 15 years old and got caught leaving a liquor store with three bottles of beer in my jacket.....
underpants....:nono:
To be honest I am looking forward to finding out which parts they contest and what proof they have. I think it will shed some light on matter and still contend Mansoor is the man on the money on subject as no one he fingered denied any of his report to my knowledge.
--for the record I think it is poor taste to bring the Monica matter into picture--could do without it.
--for the record I think it is poor taste to bring the Monica matter into picture--could do without it.
Was three different main things.
1. Clinton was so distracted by getting hummers that he ignored Bin-Laden
9/11 Commission: Clinton was extremely focused on Bin-Laden
2. Madeline Albright alerted Pakistan government that missile strike was coming and that allowed Bin-Laden to escape.
9/11 Commission: One of the Chief Joint of Staff members alerted the Pakistani military beforehand to assure them it wasn't India attacking them.
3. Sandy Berger, when told by CIA operatives that they had Bin-Laden in their sight, said that he didn't have the authority to authorize the attempt.
9/11 commission: George Tenet called off the attack because he didn't think it would be successful.
Those are the three main things they want changed.
not sure i remember any Conservative clamoring for censorship of the left wing media or any left wing movie that has been made
instead, we simply laugh at it and expose it for what it is amd use it as yet another example of bias for socialism/liberalism....not sure if we have EVER asked for political censorship!!!
for some reason, the Clintonistas and fellow democrats are TERRIFIED by this movie
is this because somethings may give us a hint of the TRUTH???
instead, we simply laugh at it and expose it for what it is amd use it as yet another example of bias for socialism/liberalism....not sure if we have EVER asked for political censorship!!!
for some reason, the Clintonistas and fellow democrats are TERRIFIED by this movie
is this because somethings may give us a hint of the TRUTH???
Thursday , September 07, 2006
By Brit Hume
Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:
Dropping a "Google Bomb"
Democratic Web loggers are so upset by that ABC 9/11 movie that they've planned an Internet attack ? known as a Google Bomb ? to make sure their view of the film dominates the Web.
Activists on Democratic-Underground.com have urged every Democratic blogger to post identical entries after the movie airs, all featuring the film's title, so that any Internet search for the movie will turn up a liberal blog highlighting what they say are multiple inaccuracies in the film.
If the plan works, bloggers say they'll be prepared to utilize the technique "at every turn" between now and November.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
---Actually this is nothing new--has been going on for some time in several areas. Go to any controversial topic and run search and see which sites dominate topic.
By Brit Hume
Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:
Dropping a "Google Bomb"
Democratic Web loggers are so upset by that ABC 9/11 movie that they've planned an Internet attack ? known as a Google Bomb ? to make sure their view of the film dominates the Web.
Activists on Democratic-Underground.com have urged every Democratic blogger to post identical entries after the movie airs, all featuring the film's title, so that any Internet search for the movie will turn up a liberal blog highlighting what they say are multiple inaccuracies in the film.
If the plan works, bloggers say they'll be prepared to utilize the technique "at every turn" between now and November.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
---Actually this is nothing new--has been going on for some time in several areas. Go to any controversial topic and run search and see which sites dominate topic.
Okay Freeze, care to give me an example of a lie in Farenhiet 11.
You righties have lied so much I think you actually start to believe it.
1 correction
1 correction
#3 Tenet called off the strike on Bin Laden that they were closest to getting him because The Royal family of The United Arab Emerites was in the area hunting....and they are a Major ally and could have beeb killed had the strike been executed. I listened to all 4 days of testimony of the 9 -11 hearings ....live. The one other thing u would have gotten out of the hearings had u watched was how focused Clinton really was on the terror threat. The Cole gets hit in December The Moron comes into office in January
..the perpetrators are identified and all the Dickhead can do is think about invading Iraq.
Read Paul O'Neil's stuff and Richard Clarke if u want to get a better idea of how Bush and his cronies dropped the ball on terror.
1 correction
#3 Tenet called off the strike on Bin Laden that they were closest to getting him because The Royal family of The United Arab Emerites was in the area hunting....and they are a Major ally and could have beeb killed had the strike been executed. I listened to all 4 days of testimony of the 9 -11 hearings ....live. The one other thing u would have gotten out of the hearings had u watched was how focused Clinton really was on the terror threat. The Cole gets hit in December The Moron comes into office in January
..the perpetrators are identified and all the Dickhead can do is think about invading Iraq.
Read Paul O'Neil's stuff and Richard Clarke if u want to get a better idea of how Bush and his cronies dropped the ball on terror.
they`re talking about pulling abc`s license?....who`s gonna pull abc`s license?....bill clinton?...hillary?(with that ubiquitous pantsuit hiding those tree trunks)....the criminal, sandy burglar?....madeline half-bright?....lol
this isn`t iran....
what happened to freeedom of expression?....cue cyndi lauper`s "true colors"....
the disclaimer that they`re posting is all that`s necessary....that`s more than michael moore ever provided...
what a joke...i understand that the "docu-drama"(not a hit piece like mike-al moore or the crap at the canadian film festival depicting bush getting assassinated)was hard on both clinton and bush...
if you can dish it out,you gotta be able to take it...
.where`s the mention of sandy burglar stealing classified documents from the national archive?....
why was this guy able to scissor some of the documents and just get a slap on the wrist?...
and finally,why the hell did he steal the documents in the first place if there was nothing to hide?....
again,the sound of crickets chirping...
this isn`t iran....
what happened to freeedom of expression?....cue cyndi lauper`s "true colors"....
the disclaimer that they`re posting is all that`s necessary....that`s more than michael moore ever provided...
what a joke...i understand that the "docu-drama"(not a hit piece like mike-al moore or the crap at the canadian film festival depicting bush getting assassinated)was hard on both clinton and bush...
if you can dish it out,you gotta be able to take it...
.where`s the mention of sandy burglar stealing classified documents from the national archive?....
why was this guy able to scissor some of the documents and just get a slap on the wrist?...
and finally,why the hell did he steal the documents in the first place if there was nothing to hide?....
again,the sound of crickets chirping...
Again Weasel, show an example of what you are talking about concerning Fahrenheit 11?
The lies in this piece of Bush Trash have already been cited in the first post on this very thread!
Now, for the third time in this thread alone, do you have anything on Fahrenheit 11 or are you making things up again?:shrug:
The lies in this piece of Bush Trash have already been cited in the first post on this very thread!
Now, for the third time in this thread alone, do you have anything on Fahrenheit 11 or are you making things up again?:shrug:
stevie there is entire link here somewhere on outright deceptions in Moores movie--remember several I put up myself involving quotes out of context--half quotes and numerous other techniques--with that being said I do not think it any better that this movie whether depicted as fiction or what ever should imply undeniably false accusations of anyone--especially in film as emotional as this one.
I do see humor however with Reid and other politicians that lined up see Moores fiasco on opening night and now are wailing like bansee's and threatening network.
The real puzzeler to me is this network running this and especially the timing of it--would almost wager even money we never see it--especially in uncut version if there ever was uncut version.
I do see humor however with Reid and other politicians that lined up see Moores fiasco on opening night and now are wailing like bansee's and threatening network.
The real puzzeler to me is this network running this and especially the timing of it--would almost wager even money we never see it--especially in uncut version if there ever was uncut version.
Dogs, most, if not all, of the so called lies have been proven to be inaccurate and the movie holds up hold up when checked.
What we have is people quoting all the "lies" of Moores movie yet no one can tell me what they are. Not surprisingly, these are the same people that constantly harp on the so called "Liberal Media" and blame them for all of this disgraceful administrations atrocities.
What we have is people quoting all the "lies" of Moores movie yet no one can tell me what they are. Not surprisingly, these are the same people that constantly harp on the so called "Liberal Media" and blame them for all of this disgraceful administrations atrocities.
I'll see if I can find thread on Moore later (don't have time now)
on things lies being proven inaccurate in this one I'm sure there will be lies but havn't seen or looked yet till movie comes out.
Certainly would not call--9/11 Commission: Clinton was extremely focused on Bin-Laden--any "proof"
I would say that is far from proof considering aside from a rocket thrown in that direction I have never found much that would lead one to think he was--if he was he sure was inept on pursuing/capturing any Alquada operatives.
I am just guessing but would wager the paraphrase "extremely focused" was used by democrat in defence in the 911 commision.
You have to understand commision was comprised by both parties trying cover their ass and any assertions by either would be made by911 commision. I will agree to the proof in that area if you or anyone find in report that same was "consensus" of 911 commision.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
maybe I missed it but can't find any such statement--can you?
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch11.htm
on things lies being proven inaccurate in this one I'm sure there will be lies but havn't seen or looked yet till movie comes out.
Certainly would not call--9/11 Commission: Clinton was extremely focused on Bin-Laden--any "proof"
I would say that is far from proof considering aside from a rocket thrown in that direction I have never found much that would lead one to think he was--if he was he sure was inept on pursuing/capturing any Alquada operatives.
I am just guessing but would wager the paraphrase "extremely focused" was used by democrat in defence in the 911 commision.
You have to understand commision was comprised by both parties trying cover their ass and any assertions by either would be made by911 commision. I will agree to the proof in that area if you or anyone find in report that same was "consensus" of 911 commision.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
maybe I missed it but can't find any such statement--can you?
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch11.htm
Last edited:
I just wish our government everyone of them would be willing to stand up and say. We didn't do all we could to protect this country. WE didn't pay attention. We get in bed with wrong people to many times and they turn on us. Dem's and Reb's alike please have some balls. And for our history sake at least get this shit 99.55% right.
This is why they are called the looney left. They stand up and get so pissed off about lies they make a statement. I like and i back it. You want to distort things than two can play. That is why democrats need to have primaries with other democrats and lets the guy with balls support the dem party. Until they figure this out they will never win. Then again they figured it out in Uconn and this power hungry prick who lost is now running as an independent. this piece of garbage is a joke.
heres one for starters Stevie--if you want moore (spl) I'll be happy tp provide--
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp
Then to prove my point in other thread about liberal blogs organizing to have there sites pull up
1st--do search on "lies by micheal moore snopes"
and you have to hunt like hell to find snopes but look what pulls up in 2 of 1st 3 listings -- a liberal blog with THEIR OPINION supposedly trumping fact.
http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/09/06/revisionism-by-snopes-on-the-bin-laden-flight/ :nono:
I'll be happy tp provide--http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp
Then to prove my point in other thread about liberal blogs organizing to have there sites pull up
1st--do search on "lies by micheal moore snopes"
and you have to hunt like hell to find snopes but look what pulls up in 2 of 1st 3 listings -- a liberal blog with THEIR OPINION supposedly trumping fact.
http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/09/06/revisionism-by-snopes-on-the-bin-laden-flight/ :nono:
Last edited:
