This Israeli doctor says Obama has a mental disorder

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,322
1,506
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
obama's issue - Israeli phychologist
? on: Today at 08:48:20 AM ?
Quote
forwarded e-mail - (shorted to eliminate superfluous stuff)

Haberman and Vaknin are legitimate. Check them out on Google if you wish.

Written by Michael A. Haberman, M.D.

This Israeli doctor says Obama has a mental disorder. Labels him a pathological narcissist and there is no greater insanity than electing one as President said Dr. Sam Vaknin who is an Israeli psychologist.

Dr. Vaknin States, "I must confess I was impressed by Obama from the first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident, a wholesome presidential package. I was put off soon, not just because of his shallowness but also because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and his body language were louder than his empty words. Obama's speeches are unlike any political speech we have heard in American history.

Never a politician in this land had such quasi "religious" impact on so many people. The fact that Obama is a total incognito with Zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming. Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In fact he is quite ignorant on most important subjects.

Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the "Malignant Self Love" believes Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist. Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism. He understands narcissism and describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person. When he talks about narcissism everyone listens. Vaknin says that Obama's language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies of his closest, dearest friends suggest that the man is either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Narcissists project a grandiose but false image of themselves.

One must never underestimate the manipulative genius of pathological narcissists. They project such an imposing personality that it overwhelms those around them. Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist, people become like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and delight to be at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around himself and reduces others in his own inverted image. He creates a cult of personality. His admirers become his codependents.

This election was like no other in the history of America. The issues were insignificant compared to what is at stake. What can be more dangerous than having a man bereft of conscience, a serial liar, and one who cannot distinguish his fantasies from reality as the leader of the free world? I hate to sound alarmist, but one is a fool if one is not alarmed. Many politicians are narcissists. They pose no threat to others. They are simply self-serving and selfish. Obama evidences symptoms of pathological narcissism, which is different from the run-of-the-mill narcissism of a Richard Nixon or a Bill Clinton for example. To him reality and fantasy are intertwined.

This is a mental health issue, not just a character flaw. Pathological narcissists are dangerous because they look normal and even intelligent. It is this disguise that makes them treacherous. Today the Democrats have placed all their hopes in Obama. But this man could put an end to their party. The great majority of blacks voted for Obama. Only a fool does not know that their support for him is racially driven. This is racism, pure and simple. The downside of this is that if Obama turns out to be the disaster I predict, he will cause widespread resentment among the whites. The blacks are unlikely to give up their support of their man. Cultic mentality is pernicious and unrelenting. They will dig their heads deeper in the sand and blame Obama's detractors of racism. This will cause a backlash among the whites. The white supremacists will take advantage of the discontent and they will receive widespread support.

I predict that in less than four years, racial tensions will increase to levels never seen since the turbulent 1960's. Obama will set the clock back decades. America is the bastion of freedom. The peace of the world depends on the strength of America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of terrorism and victory of rogue nations. It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castrists, the Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists, and virtually all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect of their man in the White House. America is on the verge of destruction.

There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist as president.

Michael A. Haberman, M.D.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Obama has a mental disorder .................. check

Obama shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17...check

Obama is a muslim................. check

Obama dont have a birth cert ..........check

Obama born in Kenya ............. check

Obama going to be impeached.... check

Obama sued by Boehnger ........ check

Obama and Bengazi ............ check

Obama and IRS scandal....... check

Obamacare repealed ..... shut down gov ....... check

Obama will take away guns............ check

Obama taking executive action too much....... check

Obama is weak in foreign lands ............. check

Obama will take over the world ............ check

Obama is gay .................. check

Michelle is a tranny ................ check


How stupid do you people sound.

pathetic how jealous and stupid runs in circles of the Neo Cons

:0008
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Obama wont go in and start WWIII with Israel so they have to come up with this.



Israel loves war as much as the PLO and the rest.


They just wait for the first rocket to fall so they can go in and kill woman and children, blow up tunnels, blow up rockets, and destroy.

I dont want Hamis to do it, but they love war .

Not to mention Israel has Gaza in a lockdown where the people cant travel anywhere without checkpoints. No airport to get out. Border searchs all the time.

Israel is as much at fault as the rest of them.

thank you Obama for not letting them push you around like they have every other President in US history.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Who Bears More Responsibility for the War in Gaza?
By John B. Judis

Like almost all conflicts that have occurred in Israel, this latest war in Gaza has provoked a furious debate. Was Israel?s ground and air assault on the Gaza Strip justified by Hamas?s rocket attacks? Or were Hamas?s rocket attacks a justifiable response to Israel?s arrest of hundreds of Hamas supporters and officials? I am not going to defend Hamas?s charter, which describes Israel and the occupied territories as an ?Islamic Waqf,? nor its strategy of hurling rockets at Israel, but I am also not going to defend Israel?s response. What matters to me, and what is often ignored, is the overall moral and political context in which this and past conflicts have occurred.

Israel is one of the world?s last colonial powers, and the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza are its unruly subjects. Like many past anti-colonial movements, Hamas and Fatah are deeply flawed and have sometimes poorly represented their peoples, and sometimes unnecessarily provoked the Israelis and used tactics that violate the rules of war. But the Israeli government has continued to expand settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and to rule harshly over its subjects, while maintaining a ruinous blockade on Gaza. That?s the historical backdrop to the events now taking place.

The Occupation
Israel?s founding in 1948 began to address the terrible wrongs that Europe?s Jews had suffered. It provided a state and what seemed like a safe haven. But Palestine?s Arabs, who had made up the overwhelming majority of the region, and who believed after the promises of World War I that they would gain their own state, came instead under Jordanian and Egyptian rule after Israel won its independence. And after the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel annexed Jerusalem, occupied the West Bank and Gaza, and turned the Palestinians who lived there into colonial subjects. The Israeli government encouraged and subsidized Jewish settlements in the territories in violation of the fourth Geneva Convention that prohibits an occupying power from transferring its population into the territories it has seized.

Israel?s settlers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem now number over 500,000. Palestinians are allowed to build on only about 40 percent of the West Bank. Settlers enjoy Israeli citizenship and rule of law. The Palestinians are under harsh military rule. No Palestinian may travel abroad without Israeli approval. There are 542 roadblocks impeding the movement of Palestinians, but not of settlers on the West Bank. Water rights are restricted. The settlers consume about six times more water than the 2.6 million Palestinians. Settler attacks on the Palestinians, which the police often ignore, have steadily increased. The number of ?price tag? attacks spiked by 300 percent this last spring during the peace talks.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blamed Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for the failure to end the occupation through a two-state solution, but Netanyahu and his administration undermined the negotiations. That was the initial conclusion that Secretary of State John Kerry?s negotiators conveyed to reporter Nahum Barnea immediately afterwards. As Ben Birnbaum and Amir Tabon recounted, Netanyahu made some concessions to Kerry last winter, but he still wouldn?t agree to any limits on an Israeli military presence in a future Palestinian state; and he wouldn?t budge on East Jerusalem or on the borders of a Palestinian state. And while the negotiations were occurring, Netanyahu and his administration reneged on a promise to release Palestinian prisoners and accelerated housing development in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. His administration announced plans for almost 14,000 housing units, or 50 a day, during the nine months of negotiations.


peacenow.org
The current Netanyahu government has issued far more tenders for housing units in settlements and East Jerusalem than have previous governments.
These were indications that Netanyahu was not serious about achieving a two-state solution. But he removed any doubt whatsoever during a press conference in early July. During the negotiations, Abbas had acceded to Israeli troops remaining in Jordan Valley for three and then five years, but Netanyahu now insisted on a permanent occupation of the lands he called by the Biblical names of Judea and Samaria. ?I think the Israeli people understand now what I always say,? he said. ?There cannot be a situation, under any agreement, in which we relinquish security control of the territory west of the River Jordan.? That meant that he and his administration foresaw a permanent colonial status for the West Bank and the Palestinians who live there. David Horovitz, the editor of the Times of Israel, wrote in a column about Netanyahu?s statement, ?He wasn?t saying that he doesn?t support a two-state solution. He was saying that it?s impossible. This was not a new, dramatic change of stance by the prime minister. It was a new, dramatic exposition of his long-held stance.?

Colonial regimes breed anti-colonial resistance. It has been happening since Biblical times. Sometimes, the resistance takes an ugly form. Think of the Algerian or Irish resistance. And that has certainly been the case with the Palestinian resistance?from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) plane hijackings and the murder of the Israeli Olympians in Munich to the Hamas suicide bombers during the Second Intifada or Hamas and Islamic Jihad?s launching of rockets on civilian targets. At each particular juncture, the colonial power may be justified in striking back at its adversaries. But ultimately the colonial power bears a great deal of responsibility for the continuing conflict.

Palestinians and the Two-State Solution
In Israel, even some old-line Zionists like the political philosopher Shlomo Avineri?the author of a truly outstanding book on Karl Marx?have placed the blame on the Palestinians for the prolongation of the conflict. Avineri claims that the root of conflict is Palestinian refusal to recognize Israel?s right to exist. The truth is, to say the least, much more complicated than that.

The PLO, the main political body representing Palestinians, has recognized Israel?s right to exist since 1988, and negotiated on that basis. (Indeed, as Kai Bird?s new book, The Good Spy, reveals, the PLO leadership had realized by 1973 that Israel was ?here to stay? and communicated that to American officials through the CIA but had failed to gain the assistance of the American Secretary of State in easing the conflict. The Israelis, for their part, assassinated the PLO contact with the CIA.) In Abbas, the Israelis had their most pliable negotiating partner ever.

Two Israeli governments made peace proposals to the PLO and later Palestinian Authority. In 1993, Yitzhak Rabin?s government negotiated an agreement with Yasser Arafat that included the PLO recognition of Israel and the creation of the Palestinian Authority. At Camp David in 2000, Ehud Barak, who had sharply increased settlements, unexpectedly offered a two-state solution to Arafat, which the PLO chairman, wary of Barak, reluctant to accept a remaining Jewish presence in East Jerusalem and holding out for a Palestinian right of return, refused to sign. (American negotiators Dennis Ross and Robert Malley have published conflicting accounts of who is to blame for the failure at Camp David.) In 2008, as Bernard Avishai has recounted, Ehud Olmert began talks with Abbas, who rejected his initial offer, but planned to continue negotiations after the American and Israeli elections. Olmert was, however, replaced by Netanyahu who refused Abbas?s proposal to continue what Olmert had begun.

If viewed over the last two decades, Israelis and Palestinians have been moving in opposite directions. Israeli governments have become less amenable to genuine compromise. In the last Israeli election, the Jewish Israeli parties that ran on a pledge to seek a two-state solution got eight out of 120 seats. The growth of settlements and the rise of a radical Jewish right constitute a growing obstacle to any genuine agreement. On the other side, the PLO has moved toward greater commitment to a two-state solution, and a greater willingness to compromise on settlements and even on the presence of Israeli troops in the Jordan Valley.

There have always been dissenting voices within the Palestinian movement just as there have been strong rightwing dissenting voices among Israeli parties. In the 1970s, the PFLP, worried about what it correctly perceived as creeping accommodation with Israel, formed a ?rejectionist front? against the PLO. And Hamas rode a similar rejectionist wave to power. But as happened from 1973 to 1988 with the PLO, Hamas has shown signs of being willing to accept Israel?s existence. It has repeatedly offered Israel a long-term ?hudna,? or truce, in exchange for an end to the occupation. It has deferred to Abbas and the PLO in the recent negotiations, and agreed to abide by a pact with Israel if it were accepted by a popular referendum. And in its unity agreement with Fatah, it explicitly accepted the PA?s leadership in negotiations with Israel. If anything, Hamas showed far more willingness to defer to the PLO leaders in two-state negotiations than two-state opponents in Netanyahu?s coalition members had shown to Netanyahu in his negotiations. Hamas?s charter can?t be used as an excuse by Israel to prolong the occupation.

The Gaza Strip
The Israeli government has also been quick to blame Gaza?s troubles on Hamas, as if Israel had no responsibility for what has happened in this narrow overpopulated stretch of land. That, too, is a conviction that lacks context. Ariel Sharon pulled the Israeli military and settlers out of Gaza in 2005, but according to the United Nations and the U.S. State Department, Israel, which continues to control Gaza?s coastline and airspace, remains an occupying power. Israel, along with the United States, has helped create a political and humanitarian nightmare in Gaza.

In January 2006, the Palestinian Authority, at the urging of George W. Bush?s administration and with the grudging support of the Israelis, held elections in Gaza and the West Bank. To their surprise, Hamas won a majority of seats. The U.S. responded by trying to cut off aid to the Palestinian Authority, while the Israelis withheld tax revenues they had collected on the Palestinians? behalf. The U.S. encouraged Abbas to consolidate his power and discouraged any cooperation between Hamas and Fatah. Then, in the fall of 2006, as I described in a New Republic article, the Bush administration incited Fatah and its military chieftain Mohammed Dahlan (who has been angling to succeed Abbas) to attempt militarily to oust Hamas from leadership in Gaza. Fatah was defeated in battle, and Hamas took charge in Gaza.

The U.S. refused to talk to the new government even though the United States has had relations with other governments that did not recognize Israel. Israel began its blockade of Gaza. The blockade, a base and immoral tactic that was intended to discredit Hamas by starving Gaza?s citizenry, wrecked Gaza?s economy. By 2011, per capita income had dropped 17 percent from 2005. Unemployment and malnutrition became rife. Israel blocked exports, including those to the West Bank. By 2011, only three percent of goods exported in 2005 were being allowed out of the country. Thirty-five percent of farmland and 85 percent of fishing waters (a main source of food) were declared off-limits by the Israelis. Gazans were denied passage to the West Bank. The Israelis turned Gaza into a kind of Palestinian Devil?s Island.

During the wars over Gaza, Hamas has displayed a willingness to kill off frightening numbers of Gaza?s citizenry, including women and children, in order to embarrass the Israelis internationally. Hamas? rockets are not really weapons of war, but of terror and propaganda. They provoke the Israelis into brutal reprisals that Hamas hopes will discredit the Israelis abroad and portray Hamas among Palestinians and Arab states as brave freedom fighters. Gaza?s citizens become unwitting suicides. The fact that in spite of this, Hamas retains support in Gaza and has become increasingly popular in the West Bank testifies to the intense anger that Palestinians feel toward continued Israeli rule and toward the blockade.

There is no moral justification for Hamas firing rockets against Israeli cities, but what initially sparked the current conflict was Israel?s determination to undermine the reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas. By that agreement, Hamas actually subordinated itself to the Palestinian Authority and to a new government that was to be staffed by technocrats who had no affiliation to either party. As Nathan Thrall from the International Crisis Group wrote in The New York Times, that agreement could have served the interest of an Israeli government committed to a two-state solution:

It offered Hamas?s political adversaries a foothold in Gaza; it was formed without a single Hamas member; it retained the same Ramallah-based prime minister, deputy prime ministers, finance minister and foreign minister; and, most important, it pledged to comply with the three conditions for Western aid long demanded by America and its European allies: nonviolence, adherence to past agreements and recognition of Israel.
But from the beginning, Israel set out to undermine it. That was consistent with Israel?s denial of Palestinian self-rule, and it helped to provoke the current conflict.

The Recent Provocations
After Abbas announced an agreement with Hamas on April 23, the Netanyahu government tried to get the United States and European governments not to recognize the new unity government. The United States did help to block payments to Hamas public workers in Gaza, but the U.S. and European countries didn?t accept Netanyahu?s plea to shun the new government altogether. In May, the Israeli government took steps in Gaza that seemed designed to draw Hamas into breaking the 2012 ceasefire. It reduced from six to three miles the offshore limit on Gaza fishing (severely limiting the catch) and fired on boats that exceeded the limit and arrested the fishermen. When the new government was sworn in on June 1, the Israeli government countered by announcing 3,300 new housing starts in the West Bank.

On June 12, two men affiliated with Hamas kidnapped and killed three Israel teenagers. While Hamas leaders unconscionably applauded the kidnapping, they denied any direct knowledge of it. The two men, as the Israeli government quickly discovered, were associated with a rogue Hamas family that had defied the organization?s leadership. The Israelis also strongly suspected that the boys had been killed, but they used the pretext of searching for the boys to arrest around 500 Palestinians, including Hamas?s West Bank officials and activists. There was sporadic rocket fire on Israel during June that seems to have come from non-Hamas Islamist groups, although the details are murky. Then on July 1, in the wake of the discovery of the three teenagers? bodies, the Israelis launched 34 airstrikes on Gaza. On July 6, it bombed a tunnel in Gaza, killing six Hamas militants. On the next day, Hamas began taking responsibility for new rockets attacks, and the Israelis then launched Protective Edge.

Some reports have said that Hamas wanted this battle; others that it never would have happened without Israeli provocation. In any case, The war began in earnest at this point, and the air raid sirens blared in Tel Aviv and the casualties mounted in Gaza. On July 14, the Egyptian military ruler Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, in consultation with the Israelis, proposed a ceasefire deal that would have ended the fight without addressing any of the issues that divided Hamas from the Israelis. For humanitarian reasons, Hamas should have taken the deal, and found some other means of resisting Israeli domination, but they rejected it, and continued to fire rockets, leading to the Israeli ground invasion.

Hamas did issue a set of proposals that included a ten-year ceasefire in exchange for ending the blockade and the siege of Gaza (which was supposed to have been negotiated after the November 2012 ceasefire) and freeing the Hamas prisoners the Israelis had rounded up in the West Bank. Ha?aretz columnist Gideon Levy enjoined his readers to ?read the list of demands and judge honestly whether there is one unjust demand among them.? But the Israelis have rejected them. And in responding to the rocket attacks, the Israelis have once again displayed inordinate and indiscriminate force against their colonial subjects. Those who argue that Netanyahu had to respond to rockets being fired on Israeli cities?even if the Iron Dome intercepted almost all of them?are certainly right. He would probably have lost office?and to someone even less disposed to conciliation?if he had turned the other cheek. On a purely day-to-day basis, one can make a case for Israeli reprisals, but in the big picture, Israel and not the Palestinians are primarily to blame for the continued conflict.
....................................................................................................


so who really is to blame then
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Israel?s settlers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem now number over 500,000. Palestinians are allowed to build on only about 40 percent of the West Bank. Settlers enjoy Israeli citizenship and rule of law. The Palestinians are under harsh military rule. No Palestinian may travel abroad without Israeli approval. There are 542 roadblocks impeding the movement of Palestinians, but not of settlers on the West Bank. Water rights are restricted. The settlers consume about six times more water than the 2.6 million Palestinians. Settler attacks on the Palestinians, which the police often ignore, have steadily increased. The number of ?price tag? attacks spiked by 300 percent this last spring during the peace talks.:scared:scared
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
obama's issue - Israeli phychologist
? on: Today at 08:48:20 AM ?
Quote
forwarded e-mail - (shorted to eliminate superfluous stuff)

Haberman and Vaknin are legitimate. Check them out on Google if you wish.

Written by Michael A. Haberman, M.D.

This Israeli doctor says Obama has a mental disorder. Labels him a pathological narcissist and there is no greater insanity than electing one as President said Dr. Sam Vaknin who is an Israeli psychologist.


Right on cue, skulnutz posts up another load of shit.

Dr. Haberman wrote no such article.

Vaknin is not a physician, has no training or degree from any accredited college in anything. He is a fraud.

Right up Skulnutz alley.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/vaknin.asp

So, skulnutz, still gobbling the shit, right?
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,322
1,506
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Right on cue, skulnutz posts up another load of shit.

Dr. Haberman wrote no such article.

Vaknin is not a physician, has no training or degree from any accredited college in anything. He is a fraud.

Right up Skulnutz alley.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/vaknin.asp

So, skulnutz, still gobbling the shit, right?

Sorry, no matches were found containing Obama had a homosexual relationship with larry sinclair.

http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-...date-range=-1&sp-x=any&sp-c=100&sp-m=1&sp-s=0
:shrug:


http://youtu.be/8WHZ6zJXS2w

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,938
738
113
50
TX

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
10411164_10152529838228279_8915679144793548833_n.jpg


..
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top