Thurs games

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
The gambling gods smiled on me last night. Went 3-0 on posted plays and 8-2 overall. One loss
was because I mis-read my notes and played NO over when my notes clearly said under. That also cost me a 3 team par.

For the past ten years I have said that if you like the dog in a game with a line of 5 or less you are better off playing the ML. The winner of the game covers over 90% of the time. It seemed to me that this wasn't happening as often this year as in the past so I decided to run the numbers on the teams that played last night. There were 20 teams and I did their last 30 games. I figure this should be a pretty good sample of what's happened so far. The winner of the game has covered the line 121-11 or 91%. No different than years past.

Now for today. The way I see it the line is 2' to 3 too high on the side at NJ. The word I got is that Shak will play but anyway you cut it the line should be no more than 3'.

The Den line is really screwy. I can come up with Ind getting points and I can come up with them giving points. If Martin plays he won't be close to 100%. I doubt if I try to figure this one out. I will be on the under tho.

I come up with Phoe able to give up to 8 which really surprises me. Nash should see limited min tonight and that loss to Bos will probably give Det backers a little more courage. The total at 207 was dead on but I expect the public to run it up a couple of points.

Back with my plays before gametime Good luck whatever you do.
 

Franky Wright

Registered User
Forum Member
May 28, 2002
3,363
16
0
58
Heaven, oh!!, this isn't it?!
gsp said:
For the past ten years I have said that if you like the dog in a game with a line of 5 or less you are better off playing the ML. The winner of the game covers over 90% of the time. It seemed to me that this wasn't happening as often this year as in the past so I decided to run the numbers on the teams that played last night. There were 20 teams and I did their last 30 games. I figure this should be a pretty good sample of what's happened so far. The winner of the game has covered the line 121-11 or 91%. No different than years past.

Thanks for the lesson Joe :) Made me think a little and just to clarify some things for me anyway.........
When you say the winner of the game covers 90% of the time, are you saying the dogs? or either or(Fav&dog). Also, 20 teams x 30 games would be a sampling of 600? No? Things that make me go hmmmmm.
I dont know what it is about the NBA, but I just seem to do really well in this league. Your posts certainly help :) too. Again thanks for posting, and heres :mj14: to your continued success!
Franky
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
Franky, first of all I just looked at the games where the line was 5 or less. That adds up to 132 games. What I'm saying is that the team that wins the game covers the spread. If you are going to play the dog then you just as well play the moneyline because if you cover, your team will also win the game. Just for kicks I'll go back and look at how many times the dog won and did not cover. Can't be over 11. I'll post it as soon as I finish.
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
In the 132 games I looked at, the dog covered 65 times. They won 54 su.
 

Franky Wright

Registered User
Forum Member
May 28, 2002
3,363
16
0
58
Heaven, oh!!, this isn't it?!
Got it! Its just semantics :)

Per your qoute.........."There were 20 teams and I did their last 30 games." I thought you meant there were 20 teams that this -5< applied to, each in their last 30games :scared LOL, that would be alot of work!!!
Thanks alot.................
Franky

Edit;
That did not come out right above, but I just saw your reply after I typed this, so nevermind and thanks again..........
 

Rcxslam

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2004
2,053
3
0
nyc
thanx for the info...I've mostly been a dog player myself...so very informative for me...thanks GSP!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top