parlay: Pitt ML and Toro ML (1 unit pays 1.61)....
Phila usually doesn't play Pitt very well, let alone in a new building with Boucher in net! Ooops! I now read it will be Bobrovsky in net. So sticking Pitt in parlay instead of -1.5, and not going for the over as originally thought
"Bobrovsky led the team in preseason action, appearing in five games and posting a 3-0-1 mark to go along with a 1.76 goals-against average and .939 save percentage in 205 minutes of play, allowing six goals on 98 shots."
Good Luck Everyone! :toast: :mj06:
All flat bet 1 unit risk per pic (for example, a +135 pic would pay 1.35 units, a -135 pic would pay 0.74 units, no rounding up or down)....so if up +3.24 units, you'd have a profit of $32.40 if betting unit is $10 flat bet each pic--or up $324 if your betting unit=$100.....Almost never any SU chalk over -160 (I will use high chalk in parlays, and I grade/record the 2-way chalk parlays with my SU pics).
Phila usually doesn't play Pitt very well, let alone in a new building with Boucher in net! Ooops! I now read it will be Bobrovsky in net. So sticking Pitt in parlay instead of -1.5, and not going for the over as originally thought
"Bobrovsky led the team in preseason action, appearing in five games and posting a 3-0-1 mark to go along with a 1.76 goals-against average and .939 save percentage in 205 minutes of play, allowing six goals on 98 shots."
Good Luck Everyone! :toast: :mj06:
All flat bet 1 unit risk per pic (for example, a +135 pic would pay 1.35 units, a -135 pic would pay 0.74 units, no rounding up or down)....so if up +3.24 units, you'd have a profit of $32.40 if betting unit is $10 flat bet each pic--or up $324 if your betting unit=$100.....Almost never any SU chalk over -160 (I will use high chalk in parlays, and I grade/record the 2-way chalk parlays with my SU pics).
