Time Warner, Comcast mull end to unlimited Internet access

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
On Thursday, Time Warner Cable will begin testing a new pricing plan that caps bandwidth usage. Kevin Leddy, Time Warner Cable's executive vice president, said the plan will be launched as a trial in Beaumont, Texas, and will consist of several tiers. The first tier, at $29.95 monthly, will be a relatively slow 768 kilobits per second with a 5GB monthly cap, while a plan at $54.90 per month will offer 15 megabits per second and a 40GB cap.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both downloads and uploads count toward the monthly total. Overages will be charged at $1 a gigabyte.

Only New Customers

Time Warner has an estimated 90,000 customers in the area, and only new customers will be offered the tiers. With some users exchanging huge, media-based files like video, some other cable companies have also considered caps. For instance, Comcast, the largest cable company in the United States, has reportedly said it may cap usage at 250 gigabytes per month.

The experiment comes as consumers have grown used to unlimited Internet usage. But Larry Hettick, an analyst with industry research firm Current Analysis, said the current problem for Internet service providers is mostly created by five percent of users, while the rest have usage patterns within expectations. Those five percent, he added, are frequently downloading or uploading huge files.

Hettick noted that providers have previously said, in effect, that their policy is "unlimited, within reason," and then kicked off those few who go unreasonably beyond expected usage. "From a marketing point of view," he said, "it's probably a better approach."

He added that it will be interesting to see how users react to this experiment, as they have become accustomed to unlimited bandwidth, and the phone market is going the other way -- toward unlimited use for a flat price. "Personally," said Hettick, who sometimes works at home and depends on his online connection, "I would not buy a usage-sensitive data plan."

'Probably Enough'

He did note that, for the 95 percent of normal users, a 40GB cap is "probably enough." But addressing the short-term problem of dealing with the five percent of overusers, he added, will not fix the long-term problem, with high-definition home movies being uploaded to YouTube or users downloading high-definition features from iTunes.

"There has to be several parts to the solution," he said. One of these is increasing capacity in the so-called "last mile" to the home, by implementing new technologies such as DOCSIS 3.0 or reducing the number of homes on a given line. "Three years ago," Hettick noted, "a cable company might have served 100 homes in a neighborhood with one access point, but now could be serving 25."

Hettick said another part of the solution is increasing capacity at the central parts of the network. But, even with these adjustments, cable companies and other service providers will still have to come to terms eventually with those ultra-high-bandwidth users.
 

Axle

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2004
3,427
4
0
This really sucks I hope it doesn't catch on...unlimited should be unlimited.

:bsflag
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
51
already in effect here at home with rogers!

What has the legitimate reaction been? Not people that are going to go screaming on the mountaintop about the sky falling, but people who have really looked at the results.

This could really hurt me if I had to go this route, but I don't want to over-react without knowing the real end-result.
 

Skins1080

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 6, 2006
123
1
0
This is pretty troubling news. I can't help to believe that some of their competitors won't cap their access, leading people to switch away from cable and over to fiber/wireless. This type of thing is just going to make the bad reputation these companies have even worse.
 

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,820
276
83
54
BG, KY, USA
I thought cell phone overages were bad. This will be a real bending over! The Lamar students might revolt at this news!
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
51
I think I'm in agreement with Cuban on this one. Like I stated above, I don't know if the limitations listed above would effect me or not. It sounds from Cuban's post that really only people who are downloading (probably illegally!) tons of movies will be effected.

If this is the case, then they SHOULD be the ones paying for the extra bandwidth, imo.
 

DR STRANGELOVE

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2003
27,355
51
0
Toronto, Canada
hahaxj6.jpg


time for me to switch! lol
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
DSL is pretty terrible compared to cable internet, imo.

As someone who made the cable to DSL switch last fall, I could not agree more. The accompanying switch from Cox cable TV to Direct TV was worth it, but there is a noticeable difference in the internet connection.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top