Tony Romo?

[AR182]

jon...

that's espn's opinion...it doesn't mean they are right.

i'm not convinced that dallas has a championship caliber defense to compete with the teams that i listed...

 

[3 Seconds]

You have got to be kidding, are you serious? Did you see him in the Buffalo game? How many interceptions? How many rings does he have? Brady will soon have 4, no...he is nowhere close to Brady s class.

He had one INT less than Manning did 2 weeks ago vs Buffalo...only difference is Tony won that game, Peyton did not.

 

[3 Seconds]

Brady completes 7 percent more of his passes, has 10 more touchdowns, and over 4 times less interceptions this season.

but Tony can hold for field goals,:shrug:

Tony would be much closer to Brady's TD total, but Dallas chooses not to run it up on folks. MB3 closes teams out.

 

[3 Seconds]

glad to see you made it home from the chihuaha meeting wally


http://chihuahua.meetup.com/cities/us/md/baltimore/2881725/?ic=sn42

priceless:
"Attend the first Meetup and who knows? You might meet Jon Kneifl!" lolololol


this argument had nothing to do with green bay skippy or whoever posted that. the post was about romo. he's not yet as good as manning, brady, or favre. i never said he wouldn't be one day, but you can't predict that.

as for romo loving john with the penis sized dogs

here's whos better in the afc:

pats
steelers
colts
jags
and probably cleveland.

you really do make coming to this place a chore and are the most miserable fanboy i've never had the pleasure to meet. i hate coming here only because there is an offchance that you will be posting.

I usually agree w. a lot that you post, but you couldnt be more wrong here.

The Steelers are not better than Dallas, are you really impressed by losses to teams like Zona & NYJ, or is it those 3 pt win over Miami. Dallas beat the NYJ 34-3 could have been 50-3. Crushed the Phins too.

nor is Jax & to say Cleveland and one of the worst D's in all of football is joke.

 

[shamrock]

what's up with you 3 seconds, quoting almost every post I make? I thought we were cool, but I'm beginning to wonder lol. I let your ridiculous comment the other day about Marino having no offensive linemen go, evidently you never heard of Stephenson Gogan or Kuechenberg:shrug:

now you really want to argue Tony is in Brady s talent level at this time in his career? Seriously?

Remember Brady won championships with horrible horrible components like Antoine Smith, Caldwell, David Patton, and David givens, all who went on to sign big free agent contracts with other teams, and I'm not sure ANY, has ever scored another touchdown. Add Branch.

 

[3 Seconds]

what's up with you 3 seconds, quoting almost every post I make? I thought we were cool, but I'm beginning to wonder lol. I let your ridiculous comment the other day about Marino having no offensive linemen go, evidently you never heard of Stephenson Gogan or Kuechenberg:shrug:

now you really want to argue Tony is in Brady s talent level at this time in his career? Seriously?

Remember Brady won championships with horrible horrible components like Antoine Smith, Caldwell, David Patton, and David givens, all who went on to sign big free agent contracts with other teams, and I'm not sure ANY, has ever scored another touchdown. Add Branch.

Huh? I didnt know it was offensive to quote somebody? :shrug: No harm intended.

I didnt say Romo is on Brady's level. He needs to win championships to make that claim. I will say I believe he is the 3rd best QB in the league right now.

He is not a fluke, some saying he is really lucky is just retarded. The kid is solid. He deserves his due. I dont care who you are you dont lead a team to a 10-1 record w/ 30 TDs in 11+ games by being lucky

 

[Agent 0659]

you dont lead a team to a 10-1 record w/ 30 TDs in 11+ games by being lucky

The hell you don't. Mcnabb did it, Culpepper did it, just to name a few...

 

[Cie]

I think Romo is a very good QB and I think he has shown excellent character and leadership for being a young guy. Still, the following are QBs that I prefer to Romo:

Manning
Brady
Palmer
Bulger
Brees
Favre



Let's see what Romo does now that Rodgers pulled the Pack within 1 score

 

[Kramer]

I think the Brownies have a solid QB

 

[Cie]

I think the Brownies have a solid QB

Like him too.

 

[AR182]

I think the Brownies have a solid QB

too early to tell...

 

[3 Seconds]

Like him too.

Let me guess more than Romo.

Simply hate for either Romo or Dallas. Nothing more, no rationality.

What the hell has Bulger ever really done but get hurt year in & year out?

 

[Kramer]

Let me guess more than Romo.

Simply hate for either Romo or Dallas. Nothing more, no rationality.

What the hell has Bulger ever really done but get hurt year in & year out?

Bulger :shrug:

We were chiming in on Brownie QB, most under-
rated QB 2date, but pay no attention :SIB

 

[Kramer]

too early to tell...

Hell of a game this Sunday, one team will proceed,
one will shit the bed, these last 5 games get real
ugly and tight. Dogs take on REAL value in the
next 5 weeks. :Yep:

 

[3 Seconds]

Bulger :shrug:

We were chiming in on Brownie QB, most under-
rated QB 2date, but pay no attention :SIB

Cie mention he would take Bulger over Romo.

Anderson is lookin nice, but if you or anyone would take DA over Romo I would have to tell you that you are nutz. :142smilie

 

[Cie]

Let me guess more than Romo.

Simply hate for either Romo or Dallas. Nothing more, no rationality.

What the hell has Bulger ever really done but get hurt year in & year out?

WTF are you talking about? I don't hate Dallas or Romo. And no, I don't rank Anderson over Romo you freakin' homer. Why don't you go pester someone else and allow me to my opinion. No rationality, my ass. I have watched each of this QBs repeatedly and the ones that I listed I prefer to Romo. Get over it.

BTW, I prefer Roethlisberger to Romo, so your idol is 8th on my list. :mj07: :mj07:

 

[3 Seconds]

WTF are you talking about? I don't hate Dallas or Romo. And no, I don't rank Anderson over Romo you freakin' homer. Why don't you go pester someone else and allow me to my opinion. No rationality, my ass. I have watched each of this QBs repeatedly and the ones that I listed I prefer to Romo. Get over it.

BTW, I prefer Roethlisberger to Romo, so your idol is 8th on my list. :mj07: :mj07:

Please explain the rationality behind taking Marc Bulger over Romo...

Romo in 12 games has 9 more TDs that Bulger has ever had in any full season in his career. Bulger has had weapons too & played in pass happy O's. Plus he gets hurt ever single year.

 

[Cie]

Please explain the rationality behind taking Marc Bulger over Romo...

Romo in 12 games has 9 more TDs that Bulger has ever had in any full season in his career. Bulger has had weapons too & played in pass happy O's. Plus he gets hurt ever single year.

Romo is a good QB, but I prefer Bulger. I mentioned in this thread that I like Romo's character and leadership qualities, particularly considering he only in his 2nd year as a starter. Sure, Romo is having a better statistical season than Bulger this year. Means little to me. Brady has better numbers than Manning this year, but I still think Peyton is the best QB in the league.

Bulger got hurt in '05 missing about half of the season. Other than that, he's played 14+ every season. This season Bulger hasn't played as well as normal, but when healthy he's a stud. Last season, he threw for over 4000 yards with 24 TDs to 8 Ints.

I don't want to make you cry, but it is my opinion that a healthy Bulger would have better numbers than your guy if playing for the Boys this year. I might be wrong, but Jason Garret appears to be a stud OC. Romo got excellent protection tonight. Give Bulger that protection and maybe he doesn't get hurt as often:shrug:

 

[3 Seconds]

Romo is a good QB, but I prefer Bulger. I mentioned in this thread that I like Romo's character and leadership qualities, particularly considering he only in his 2nd year as a starter. Sure, Romo is having a better statistical season than Bulger this year. Means little to me. Brady has better numbers than Manning this year, but I still think Peyton is the best QB in the league.

Bulger got hurt in '05 missing about half of the season. Other than that, he's played 14+ every season. This season Bulger hasn't played as well as normal, but when healthy he's a stud. Last season, he threw for over 4000 yards with 24 TDs to 8 Ints.

I don't want to make you cry, but it is my opinion that a healthy Bulger would have better numbers than your guy if playing for the Boys this year. I might be wrong, but Jason Garret appears to be a stud OC. Romo got excellent protection tonight. Give Bulger that protection and maybe he doesn't get hurt as often:shrug:

Highly doubt it. First off he lacks the mobility of Romo.

Romo is on pace for 4250 yards & 41 TDs, I will take that over 4300 & 24 TDs.

Its ok, your opinion is your opinion. I just know now to ignore your opinion on the topic of NFL Qbs. :mj07:

 

[kneifl]

3 seconds and a few others are the only ones that make sense in this thread.

Bottom line is there are a bunch of Dallas haters in this thread.

So, I'm done commenting in this thread. As for Romo and the Cowboys, anyone who doubts and questions a 11-1 team is any good needs a frontal labotomy.

kneifl