========================================
1. Several questions. a) they released as minimal an amount as they felt they could; more would be released if needed; to Shroud this is mystery--by this most secretive administration--doesn't say jack. b) nothing to hide, where 9-11 is concerned. c) say what? d) pants down. e) of course not.
Your answer doesn't make much sense. If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding it??? They showed everything at the WTC's, why not show it here?
2. Same. a) answered previously. b) if different agencies submit differeing answer to an investigatory body after an event like this are you going to then blame them?--gimme a break. c) the flight path is estimated; Loose Change gets the angle and several other details wrong, though you wouldn't consider them as a source, would you?
Why do you use loose change as gospel, are you a pilot? Pilots for the truth have meticulously broken down the flight paths from gov. released tapes ... they were 200' off, maybe you should actually try watching Pandoras Black Box and learn the truth you are trying to suppress .. and you did not explain how HANI could find his way back, using signposts? Again, have you listened to reputable pilots address the joke that an unskilled pilot could have pulled this off, its like a low minor league hitter going .401 in the SHOW his rookie year--come on, even you don't believe his 600 hours could have performed his ludicrous banked turn? Again, do some friggin research on the odds or did he just get luck doing something he had never done in his life on a craft infinitely more difficult to maneuver.:mj07:
3. see 2b
So, you are saying Mineta lied and the Dick Cheney never issued the stand down order per se, '30 MILES, 20 MILES, 10 MILES"?
4. This is a total interpretation of "scramble" means--doesn't mean an intercept but a scramble alert (and surely you know about the lag time for that, aye?)--try finding some actualy sources about intercepts....good luck...didn't happen--P.S. check out the number of "scrambles" that happened the year after 9-11 and in subsequent years (try multiplied 4-6 times that "67" but you knew that no doubt). "15 minutes" is another distortion of reality but your belief of "scrambles" as being "intercepts" leave you no choice but to believe this myth. To you the cold war dividend was a complete myth and the U.S. was on high alert during G.W. first year...note how well they performed in their duties during Katrina.
So it usually takes more than 90 mins? And the coincidence of the vigilant guardian war games and same cloak for the London bombings war games being played at exact same moments is just kismit?
5. Nobody lied about their phone calls. Never mind that cell phones used to be more powerful than they are now--due to necessity--nor that most calls reported were from airphones, nor that the few calls made by cell phone occured over sparsely populated areas making cell phone connections much easier, but there are further problems with the "study" that one, non-replicated test suggests this lack of cell-phone ability from a time gone by...you've looked into this study though, no doubt, so you probably know about its flaws, aye?
Of course they lied about the cell phone calls! And you're telling me cell phone reception is EASIER out in the middle of nowhere with no towers at 30,000 feet and 500mph?
6. Irrelevant. Bush is a turd, and a turd would likely attract other turds so don't hold the Secret Service responsible for anything (extra).
Laughable response, so the endangering of children is a by product not a known factor of said events?
7. If the U.S. government actually bullshitted about some freakin' passport or some bandana then whoop-de-do? Don't think they might fake something to provide whatever further evidence they need to back up their otherwise tenuous (or whatever) argument...this says nothing, in other words.
Best response yet! If they "bullshitted" that means they lied, so what else are they lying about, cant have it both ways, big guy!!!
8. Multiplon. a) question makes no sense. b) there is no thermite; Jones evidence is :mj13: ...you do understand what Jones "evidence" for thermite is, right? c) FEMA should test for what results?--they knew the cause of the collapses. d) you have no clue what investigation "of the crime scene" too place...try some other sources. e) collapse was a very explosive event...don't think anyone would disagree with that. f) the EPA lied about the air quality because they were directed to by their superiors--utilitarian by their corrupt standards but the benefits were obvious, aye? g) see 8d
So they gov. lied again about air quality, nuff said ... thermite is there, you say no, i say yes, go ask Jones and others ...
9. a) The flight manifest were originally released short several names from each flight--no release of hijacker names--if you understand 7. then you might get this one. b) "board without tickets?"...are you kidding me? c) one group did its job while the other is protecting its ass d) several reports of "living" terrorists have been debunked--see the shit you refuse to look at sometime...that is, read it. e) Connections between the supposed hijackers and U.S. military training seems suspect at best--I'll look at what you have to offer here--
let my love open the door--but my guess is you won't even notice this solidary query because you'll totally dismiss this stuff which clearly challenges your belief...time will tell. f) gee, they got into the country...see 1d, 4conclusion and some common sense tossed in.
Atta's dad said he called him in article the day after 9/11 ... go to taking aim and listen to detailed reporting and facts on many of the terrorists documented working at US military installations... show me people who say they didn't, i can play your game of proof too.
10. a) says nothing...who cares what this shit "cost?" b) You don't understand what "pull it" meant. c) The report didn't cover bulding 7...that was a side-effect, if you will, like whatever subsequent deaths occured due to contaminated ground zero working conidtions. d) Silverstein is losing money on this deal--i.e. it's COSTING HIM--though he still owns the rights to the properties...whoop-de-do for him this last 7 years aye?...yeah...made a killing...what a great business decision. e) the buildings being pieces of shit (which might offend some viewers) and them going kaput says nothing.
<---------Fire???
Monday--nothing
Tuesday--nothing
Wednesday and Thursday--nothing
Friday for a change a little more nothing
Saturday once more--nothing
--The Fugs
