Top 6 things Republicans consider more important than job creation

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Top 6 things Republicans consider more important than job creation
By Sahil Kapur from Rawstory.com
March 22, 2011 @ 8:46 am

WASHINGTON ? Republicans won dramatic victories last November by promising to mitigate high unemployment. "This coming election is about one issue: jobs," to-be Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said [1] weeks before election day. "It's about jobs that were promised to the American people by the current administration, and were never delivered."

But in the three months since taking over the House and expanding their voices in the Senate, Republicans have yet to pass a jobs-focused bill, instead prioritizing numerous social and cultural issues that are unrelated to job creation -- and have little or no chance of becoming policy.

Here are six such legislative goals they've been hard at work on.

1) Curtailing Abortion Rights

A top priority for Republicans, H.R. 3, "The No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act" is on its way to passage [2] in the House after successfully maneuvering through the Judiciary [3] and Ways And Means Committees.

Though the GOP stripped out some of its most controversial provisions -- such as denying exemptions to a woman even in cases of rape, incest and when her life is in danger [4] -- the measure raises costs for businesses by eliminating tax deductions on employee health insurance plans that cover abortion.

2) Defunding Planned Parenthood

The House last month approved a measure [5] 240-185, sponsored by Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), to cut off all $317 million in Title X funding for Planned Parenthood and all other health care providers that offer abortions.

Under the law, Title X money cannot be used for abortion, so -- beyond the shot across Planned Parenthood's bow -- Republicans effectively voted to strip funding [6] enjoyed by mostly low-income women for medical services like cancer screenings, breast exams and HIV tests.

3) Defunding NPR

In the wake of James O'Keefe's highly edited video sting that defamed National Public Radio executives, House Republicans last week called an emergency session to push through legislation that eliminates taxpayer funds to the radio-based news agency. It passed 228-192 [7] on a partisan vote, winning over no Democrats and losing 7 Republicans.

4) Investigating American Muslims

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King (R-NY) held a controversial hearing two weeks ago about the extent of radicalization within the American Muslim community. Though even critics admitted [8] that the xenophobic undertones were relatively mild compared to what they expected, the hearings had their fair share of bizarre statements [9].

5) Declaring English As America's Official Language

Liberating Americans from ever needing to learn another language, Republicans this month introduced [10] the "English Language Unity Act," which would declare English as the official language of the U.S.

The bill declares that "all citizens should be able to read and understand generally the English language text of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the laws of the United States made in pursuance of the Constitution."

6) Reaffirming The "In God We Trust" Motto

The House Judiciary Committee last week approved a GOP resolution [11] reaffirming the motto of the United States as "In God We Trust" -- you know, just in case people forgot what America was all about.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Actually they're doing exactly what the teabaggers want - all posing and and show but no real work.

Remember the teabagger's motto - "Keep your government hands off my Medicare":142smilie
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
interesting tid bit here - the executive branch and the Senate are still controlled by which party?

I guess NCAA tournament brackets, golf and vacations are more important than global crisises AND domestic jobs?

just being fair here, Chadman. Say what you will about what the (R)'s are doing but what are the (D)'s doing about it as well?

Until we as a nation stop pointing fingers and blaming 'that other party', we are screwed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cie

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
To be fair, which is what you're suggesting, I believe all revenue-related bills originate in the House of Representatives. Certainly spurring on job growth would require some kind of plan, program, or funding in some manner, don't you think?

That's the point of the article. Don't you think if your main focus is on job creation, you'd do something to address it before some of these other things? The republicans campaigned on this, asked voters to support this idea, and what have we seen? Remember how soon Obama was held to the fire in this forum after he was elected?

I do. Just saying - if you ask for the attention, perhaps you should actually GET that attention. We've discussed Obama and the dems for quite a while now - just giving Boehner and Company their just due, as requested by them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trench

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
Chadman,
I did not have enough posts until recently to enter this forum. I have no idea who held Obama's feet to the fire.
Yes - they ran on a jobs creation platform among other things. Unfortunately, in my eyes, the great job creation machine in the USA is the private sector, not gov't. The best thing gov't can do is get out the way. We all know that is not going to happen.
Anyway, hold Boehner responsible - HOLD ALL OF CONGRESS responsible - it is obvious from that report that they (R) have NOT been pushing any job creation legislation.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
To be fair, which is what you're suggesting, I believe all revenue-related bills originate in the House of Representatives. Certainly spurring on job growth would require some kind of plan, program, or funding in some manner, don't you think?

That's the point of the article. Don't you think if your main focus is on job creation, you'd do something to address it before some of these other things? The republicans campaigned on this, asked voters to support this idea, and what have we seen? Remember how soon Obama was held to the fire in this forum after he was elected?

I do. Just saying - if you ask for the attention, perhaps you should actually GET that attention. We've discussed Obama and the dems for quite a while now - just giving Boehner and Company their just due, as requested by them.

Chad:

Didn't the Dems spend their first 2 years on Healthcare, and ignore jobs entirely?

Oh yea - don't bring up the "stimulous" as a job program......:nono:
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
Chad:

Didn't the Dems spend their first 2 years on Healthcare, and ignore jobs entirely?

Oh yea - don't bring up the "stimulous" as a job program......:nono:

For some unknown reason the Dems spent the first two years trying to compromise with the Republicans the voters threw out in record numbers. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duff Miver

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
For some unknown reason the Dems spent the first two years trying to compromise with the Republicans the voters threw out in record numbers. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Exactly. They should have told them to shut the fuck up and got the health care bill they wanted passed. Then because of that we got a sham of a health care bill. Then to make matters worse they acted like a bunch of pussies after they got it passed.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
Exactly. They should have told them to shut the fuck up and got the health care bill they wanted passed. Then because of that we got a sham of a health care bill. Then to make matters worse they acted like a bunch of pussies after they got it passed.

Funny - but if anyone suggests that Walker do the same thing in WI for the union bill, all you liberals get your panties in a bind.

I guess only when it best serves your interest, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyBlueChip

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Funny - but if anyone suggests that Walker do the same thing in WI for the union bill, all you liberals get your panties in a bind.

I guess only when it best serves your interest, right?

They had the majority and they campaigned on it. Walker did not campaign on that in WI. Nice try as usual.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
They had the majority and they campaigned on it. Walker did not campaign on that in WI. Nice try as usual.

Very similiar.....

The Obama campaigned on having a health care bill. He never gave explicit details on what it would be and how it would affect various people. In fact he said many things like "if you like your plan, you can keep it". Which is an outright lie as we all know now.

Likewise, Walker campaigned on having a balanced budget. He never said HOW he was going to get it done.

No difference - both of them came through on their campaign promises.

Now, you and the rest of your union buddies are cryin'.

Why aren't you at the White House every day, protesting that Obama doesn't allow the Fed works to have collective bargaining rights?????

I guess it is not all that important, is it?
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
I think he was going for "stimulousy" but forget the 'y'.

lmao.

Or perhaps that is how the Reverend Jessie Jackson spells it? hahahahaha


We all got duped so bad on the Stimulus Plan. Only sector that got stimulated was the banks and they made out like robber barons.

Makes me fricking sick to see what the banks have gotten away with, especially on this second round of Quantitative Easing. Unbelievable corruption.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Very similiar.....

The Obama campaigned on having a health care bill. He never gave explicit details on what it would be and how it would affect various people. In fact he said many things like "if you like your plan, you can keep it". Which is an outright lie as we all know now.

Likewise, Walker campaigned on having a balanced budget. He never said HOW he was going to get it done.

No difference - both of them came through on their campaign promises.

Now, you and the rest of your union buddies are cryin'.

Why aren't you at the White House every day, protesting that Obama doesn't allow the Fed works to have collective bargaining rights?????

I guess it is not all that important, is it?

Bullshit. He never stated he was going to go after collective bargaining. As for Obama, he actually comprised with the GOP. His first mistake.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
45,195
2,783
113
On the course!
Why aren't you at the White House every day, protesting that Obama doesn't allow the Fed works to have collective bargaining rights?????

I guess it is not all that important, is it?


How the fuck are non-union workers going to have collective bargaining rights?

That's a nifty trick!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duff Miver

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,543
230
63
Bowling Green Ky
Hmm Why would you want to bring up Rebs and job creation Chad? What next--starting unprovoked wars :)

Wasn't but 2006 when you all and pelosi were screaming about jobs situation being worst since great depression--

Glad you all got in power-- and got things corrected :facepalm:

Sure would hate to go back and relive those terrible times :SIB

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/worst_job_records_since_the_great_depression/

Worst jobs record since the Great Depression?

Let?s analyze that a bit.
First, a run down of recent economic data:
  1. Unemployment down to 4.4%.
  2. 92,000 new jobs created in October.
  3. 470,000 new jobs over the last three months.
  4. Our economy has now added jobs for 38 straight months.
  5. Real, after-tax income has risen by 9.8% in the last six years. That?s $2,660, on average, that?s staying in the pocket of every single American rather than going to the government in taxes.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
Bullshit. He never stated he was going to go after collective bargaining. As for Obama, he actually comprised with the GOP. His first mistake.

Obama never said he was going to go after all the small insurance companies with rules and regulations that would make it impossible to survive...

But he did......

All Walker is doing is trying to put state workers on a level playing field with Federal Workers.

How the hell can anyone argue that is not fair?? :0corn

Collective bargaining is not a "right" like free speach. It is a PRIVILEGE. And, like any privilege, it should be taken away when it is abused.

And it has been abused in the public sector for years - which is exactly why it is being taken away.

AND exactly why it does not exist for Federal Employees.

Funny how you guys keep bitching about this, but never a peep why this important "right" does not exist for Federal Employees. Not a peep.

Because even you libs know it has no place in the private sector. But you guys just love to stick it to the taxpayer, for the benefit of the 5% in WI that it unjustly benefits.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
How the fuck are non-union workers going to have collective bargaining rights?

That's a nifty trick!

Ah... .there's the key.

No need for unions. If Federal Employees don't need 'em (and I did think SOME of them were unionized, but maybe not), then certainly state workers don't need them.

YYZ, wouldn't you rather be recognized for your own skills and abilities, rather than awarded based on the "average" public employee?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skulnik
Bet on MyBookie
Top