Bet these when they 1st came out and they have changed--some alot-
Tulsa ov 48'
Buff un 61-now at 55'
more later gl
Tulsa ov 48'
Buff un 61-now at 55'
more later gl
Totals-Week 1
- Thread starter hawkeye
- Start date
Surf City for me is a state of mind more than a place. I live in Peru right now.
Me neither. As much as it pains me, I'll probably be making a big play against the Hawks. :facepalm:
Interesting game. NoILL may be the better program at the moment. Still, Big10 pedigree. Interesting line - game s/b tight. NoILL no joke.
:scared The sad thing is that you may be right. I see a max of 5 wins and a minimum of 2. 3-4 sounds about right to me. :facepalm: Is the clock running on Ferentz yet?
The Over 48.5 Tulsa has me scared now that the total has dropped to 48 with the vast majority of the bets on the over.
Have a great season Hawkeye. You usually do. :toast:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/college-football/news/20130708/best-worst-college-football-coaches/
"Kirk Ferentz, Iowa. The 2009 Orange Bowl proved an aberration in Ferentz's otherwise unimpressive recent tenure. Take away that one 11-2 season and the Hawkeyes are 47-41 since 2005 under their $3.6 million-per-year coach." :facepalm:
Comments: ospbaboon:
Mandel seems to make two arguments against Ferentz.
The first argument is a cherry-picked 47-41 record that omits his best recent season. In other words, if you take away his best work, his record is only a little above average. Pedestrian? Yes. Worst five? Hardly.
Mandel seems to realize that this argument alone does not hold much water and so he offers up the context of Ferentz' large salary as the second argument. While this might hold sway if one were to claim that Ferentz were one of the most overpaid coaches in the game, it is not relevant to whether or not he is a good coach. This distinction appears to be too subtle for Mandel.
Ferentz is hardly above criticism. But don't call a coach with a recent average record one of the worst in the game just because he is overpaid.
GL
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/college-football/news/20130708/best-worst-college-football-coaches/
"Kirk Ferentz, Iowa. The 2009 Orange Bowl proved an aberration in Ferentz's otherwise unimpressive recent tenure. Take away that one 11-2 season and the Hawkeyes are 47-41 since 2005 under their $3.6 million-per-year coach." :facepalm:
Comments: ospbaboon:
Mandel seems to make two arguments against Ferentz.
The first argument is a cherry-picked 47-41 record that omits his best recent season. In other words, if you take away his best work, his record is only a little above average. Pedestrian? Yes. Worst five? Hardly.
Mandel seems to realize that this argument alone does not hold much water and so he offers up the context of Ferentz' large salary as the second argument. While this might hold sway if one were to claim that Ferentz were one of the most overpaid coaches in the game, it is not relevant to whether or not he is a good coach. This distinction appears to be too subtle for Mandel.
Ferentz is hardly above criticism. But don't call a coach with a recent average record one of the worst in the game just because he is overpaid.
GL
I a going to lay low the first few weeks-just not going to have the time like I have had in the past.
I blame a lot of Iowa's problems lately on who the OC's have been:shrug:
I blame a lot of Iowa's problems lately on who the OC's have been:shrug:
- Apr 28, 2006
- 1,552
- 32
- 0
